John Carpenter was pissed off.
It was 1987. He had just spent years battling big studios over Big Trouble in Little China, a movie that basically flopped because the suits didn't know how to market it. So, he did what any self-respecting genre master would do: he went back to his roots. He signed a deal with Alive Films for a measly $3 million budget and total creative control.
The result? The Prince of Darkness movie.
It’s the second entry in his "Apocalypse Trilogy"—sandwiched between The Thing (1982) and In the Mouth of Madness (1994). Honestly, it might be the weirdest of the three. While The Thing is about paranoia and Madness is about the loss of reality, Prince of Darkness is about something much more unsettling. It’s about the idea that the Devil isn't a guy with horns, but a sentient, swirling green liquid that obeys the laws of quantum physics.
The Physics of Evil
Most horror movies rely on "magic" or "demons" that just exist because the script says so. Carpenter didn't want that. He was deep-diving into theoretical physics and atomic theory at the time. He wanted to know what happens when you combine the subatomic world with the supernatural.
In the film, a priest (played by the legendary Donald Pleasence) discovers a secret hidden by a forgotten sect called the Brotherhood of Sleep. There’s a canister in a basement in Los Angeles. Inside is a green fluid that has been sitting there for seven million years.
👉 See also: Is Heroes and Villains Legit? What You Need to Know Before Buying
He calls in Professor Howard Birack, played by Victor Wong. Birack brings a group of graduate students to the church to study the thing. This is where it gets heavy. They don't just find a "ghost." They find out that the Catholic Church has been lying for 2,000 years to keep us from panicking.
What the Movie Actually Posits
Basically, the film suggests that:
- Jesus was an extraterrestrial who came to warn us about this liquid.
- "Satan" is a physical entity made of anti-matter.
- There is an "Anti-God" in a mirror dimension trying to get into our world.
It's a wild premise. It’s "science-horror." The logic of the world collapses on a subatomic level into "ghosts and shadows," as Birack says in his lecture. You’ve got these brilliant minds trying to use computers and quadratic equations to solve a problem that is literally from another dimension.
The Transmission from the Future
If you’ve seen the movie, you remember the dream.
Every character who sleeps near the church has the same recurring "vision." It’s a grainy, video-style broadcast of a shadowy figure emerging from the church doors. A distorted voice tells them: "This is not a dream... not a dream. We are using your brain's electrical system as a receiver. We are transmitting from the year 1999."
✨ Don't miss: Jack Blocker American Idol Journey: What Most People Get Wrong
That sequence is terrifying. Carpenter didn't use high-end effects for it. He actually shot the footage with a video camera and then re-photographed it off a TV screen to give it that "dislocated" feeling. It feels like something you shouldn't be seeing. It implies that the "future" is trying to warn the "present" that the apocalypse is inevitable.
Behind the Scenes Chaos
They shot this thing in just 30 days.
Because the budget was so tight, Carpenter brought back his favorites. Donald Pleasence, Victor Wong, and Dennis Dun all showed up because they loved working with him. Even Alice Cooper is in it! He plays the leader of a group of possessed homeless people who surround the church.
Cooper actually brought his own stage props to the set. That scene where he kills a guy with a broken bicycle frame? That was his own "impaling device" from his concerts. He also wrote a song for the film, also titled "Prince of Darkness," which you can hear playing through a pair of headphones in one scene.
Why It Still Matters Today
When it first came out, critics weren't kind. It was called "clunky" and "slow." But the Prince of Darkness movie has aged like a fine wine—or maybe like a canister of sentient green goo.
🔗 Read more: Why American Beauty by the Grateful Dead is Still the Gold Standard of Americana
It taps into a very specific kind of dread. It’s the fear that our systems of knowledge—both religion and science—are just thin veneers over a reality that is much more hostile than we can imagine. The film doesn't give you a happy ending. It gives you a choice between saving the world and saving the person you love.
The ending is a gut punch. Catherine Danforth (Lisa Blount) makes a sacrifice that is cruel and unjust. And even after she does it, the movie ends with a lingering shot of a mirror, suggesting that the door isn't really closed.
Actionable Insights for Fans
If you’re planning a rewatch or seeing it for the first time, keep an eye on these details:
- The Wide-Angle Lenses: Carpenter and DP Gary B. Kibbe used anamorphic lenses that cause slight distortions at the edges. It makes the church feel "off" and claustrophobic even in wide shots.
- The "Liquid" Physics: Pay attention to how the green fluid moves. It defies gravity, moving upward toward the ceiling, which was achieved by filming the sets upside down.
- The Script Credit: Look for the name "Martin Quatermass" in the credits. That’s Carpenter’s pseudonym, an homage to Nigel Kneale’s Quatermass stories which inspired the film's "science vs. ancient evil" theme.
Watch it late at night. Turn off the lights. Listen to that pulsing, synthesizer score. It’s one of the few movies that actually feels like a transmission from a darker place.
To get the most out of your viewing, compare the "possession" mechanics here to Carpenter's The Thing. While The Thing is biological, the possession in Prince of Darkness is described as "information" or "fluid" being passed like a virus—a concept many film historians link to the 1980s AIDS crisis. Recognizing these subtexts makes the "green goo" a lot more grounded and a lot more frightening.