Walk along the shore of Plymouth, Massachusetts, and you can’t miss it. That massive, grey, weather-beaten structure sits right on the edge of Cape Cod Bay like a ghost from a different era of American energy. It’s the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, and honestly, even though it stopped sending electricity to the grid years ago, it’s still one of the most talked-about spots in New England.
It’s quiet now. No more hum.
When the plant officially shut down on May 31, 2019, many locals thought the story was over. They figured the lights would go out, the fences would stay up for a bit, and eventually, the land would just... return to nature. But that is not how nuclear physics works. You don’t just "turn off" a boiling water reactor (BWR) and walk away. What’s happening now at the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant is a complex, multi-billion-dollar game of radioactive musical chairs that has everyone from local fishermen to federal judges on edge.
The Reality of What’s Left at Pilgrim
The big issue isn’t just the building. It's the water. And the fuel.
For decades, Pilgrim was a workhorse. It started up in 1972, a GE Type 3 boiling water reactor designed to pump out about 680 megawatts. For nearly 50 years, it was a massive part of the Massachusetts energy portfolio. But age catches up to everyone. By the time Holtec International bought the site from Entergy in 2019, the goal shifted from generation to "decommissioning."
Basically, Holtec’s job is to tear the whole thing down.
But you've got to deal with the spent fuel first. Right now, there are dozens of "dry casks" sitting on concrete pads on-site. These are massive, steel-and-concrete canisters filled with spent uranium fuel rods. They aren't going anywhere anytime soon because the United States still doesn't have a permanent federal repository for nuclear waste. So, while the reactor building might disappear, those casks are likely staying put for decades. It’s a literal stalemate.
Then there’s the wastewater. This is where things get heated.
The Controversy Over Cape Cod Bay
If you follow local news in Plymouth, you’ve heard the name "Holtec" a lot. The company initially proposed evaporating or discharging roughly one million gallons of treated radioactive water into Cape Cod Bay.
The pushback was instant.
Local activists like the group "Save Our Shores" and "Pilgrim Watch" went into overdrive. Why? Because the bay is the lifeblood of the local economy. We’re talking about a multi-million dollar fishing and lobstering industry. Even if the water is "treated" to meet Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) standards, the perception of radioactive water being dumped near oyster beds is enough to tank a local brand.
It’s a classic conflict of interest. On one side, you have federal regulators (the NRC) who generally maintain that these discharges are safe and routine for the industry. On the other side, you have the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the EPA, who have stepped in with much stricter roadblocks. In 2023 and 2024, the state essentially threw a giant yellow flag on the play, denying permits and insisting that Holtec find another way to deal with the liquid.
It’s messy. It’s expensive. And it’s a perfect example of why decommissioning a plant is often harder than building one.
What Most People Get Wrong About Nuclear Shutdowns
People often think "decommissioning" means the site is dangerous for miles around. That’s not really the case. Once the fuel is out of the reactor core and cooled down in the spent fuel pool (and eventually moved to dry casks), the immediate risk of a "meltdown" basically vanishes. The physics just aren't there anymore.
💡 You might also like: The Charlie Kirk Shooting Video: What Really Happened at Utah Valley University
However, the "slow" danger is the cost.
Decommissioning a site like the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant costs upwards of $1 billion. This money comes from a Decommissioning Trust Fund that was built up over decades via tiny surcharges on your electric bills. The concern is always: what happens if the money runs out before the dirt is clean? Holtec claims their "DECON" method—which is an accelerated cleanup—is the most efficient way to do it. Critics worry that "efficient" is just corporate-speak for "cutting corners."
The "Zion" Comparison
To understand Pilgrim, look at what happened at the Zion Nuclear Power Station in Illinois. That was another big decommissioning project. It showed that you can dismantle these giants relatively quickly, but you end up with a "ISFSI" (Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation).
That’s a fancy acronym for a parking lot for nuclear waste.
That is the reality for Plymouth. Even if every brick of the reactor building is hauled away to a low-level waste site in Texas or Utah, those dry casks will remain. They are the permanent neighbors that nobody asked for, sitting there on the coast, protected by armed guards and high-tech sensors.
Why This Matters for the Future of Energy
You might wonder why we should care about a dead plant in Massachusetts. Well, because the U.S. fleet is aging.
Pilgrim is the canary in the coal mine. How we handle the water, the waste, and the local protests here sets the blueprint for plants in New York, California, and beyond. If Holtec and the state can’t reach an agreement on the wastewater, it sets a legal precedent that could stall decommissioning projects nationwide.
There's also the carbon argument. When Pilgrim closed, Massachusetts lost its largest source of carbon-free electricity. Replacing that 680MW isn't as simple as putting up a few wind turbines. It’s a gap that was largely filled by natural gas, which, let's be honest, wasn't exactly the goal for the state's climate plan. It’s a bittersweet reality: the plant was old and needed to go, but its departure made the state’s green energy goals a lot harder to hit.
The Economic Aftershocks
Let's talk about the money. Not the billion-dollar trust fund, but the local property taxes.
For years, the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant was the biggest taxpayer in Plymouth. When it shut down, the town had to figure out how to fill a massive hole in the budget. To their credit, Plymouth officials spent years planning for the "glide path"—a gradual reduction in payments—but you can’t lose an industrial giant like that without feeling the pinch in your schools and road budgets.
The "New" Plymouth is pivoting toward tourism and ocean-related tech, but the shadow of the cooling tower (which is actually gone now, but you get the metaphor) remains.
Current Status Check (2025-2026)
As of now, the dismantling of the physical structures is well underway. Most of the primary components have been chopped up and shipped out. The focus has shifted almost entirely to:
- Water Management: Finding a disposal method that doesn't involve the Bay (likely trucking it to a specialized treatment facility out of state).
- Site Restoration: Testing the soil for isotopes like Strontium-90 and Cesium-137 to ensure the land meets "release" criteria.
- The ISFSI: Maintaining the security of the dry cask storage area.
Actionable Insights for Residents and Observers
If you live in the area or are following the decommissioning of large industrial sites, there are a few things you should be doing to stay informed and protect your interests.
- Track the NDCP Meetings: The Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel meets regularly. These aren't just boring government meetings; they are where the actual arguments between Holtec and the state happen. It’s the best place to get unfiltered updates on the wastewater situation.
- Monitor EPA Filings: Don't just take the company's word for it. The EPA and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) publish technical comments on discharge permits. Look for "NPDES" permit updates if you want the nitty-gritty on what's being released.
- Understand the "Prompt Decommissioning" Model: Be aware that the goal of the current owner is to finish the job quickly to pocket the remainder of the trust fund. This creates an inherent tension between "fast" and "thorough." As a citizen, your role is to advocate for the latter.
- Look at the Land Use Future: Start participating in town planning discussions about what the site should become once it's released for "unrestricted use." While the waste casks will stay, hundreds of acres of prime coastal real estate will eventually open up. Whether that becomes a park, a solar farm, or luxury condos is being decided now.
The Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant isn't just a relic of the Cold War era of energy; it’s a living lesson in how we handle the "trash" of the 20th century. It’s a slow, expensive, and deeply human process. It’s about more than just radiation; it’s about the trust between a corporation, the government, and the people who live within the evacuation zone.
The towers might be coming down, but the story of Pilgrim is far from over. Keep an eye on the water permits—that’s where the final chapter will be written.