Language is changing fast. Maybe too fast for some. You’ve probably seen the phrase trans women are not women trending on X or mentioned in a heated school board meeting recently. It’s not just a mean-spirited jab anymore; it’s become the central pillar of a massive, global debate over the very definition of "womanhood" in the law, sports, and medicine.
People are dug in.
On one side, you have the major medical associations like the American Psychological Association (APA) and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). They argue that gender identity is the internal sense of being male, female, or something else, and that this internal sense is what defines a person's womanhood. For them, a trans woman is a woman, period.
But there’s a growing, vocal counter-movement. This group includes "gender critical" feminists, biological essentialists, and conservative policymakers. They argue that the statement trans women are not women is a biological fact rooted in gametes, chromosomes, and reproductive potential. They believe that "woman" is a sex-based category, not a feeling or a social performance.
This isn't just an academic spat. It’s affecting who gets to use which bathroom, who competes in the Olympics, and how doctors treat kids with gender dysphoria.
The biological argument and the definition of "Woman"
Why are people so stuck on this? Honestly, it usually comes down to biology.
Critics of gender identity theory often point to the biological reality of sexual dimorphism. In humans, sex is determined by the production of either large gametes (eggs) or small gametes (sperm). This is a binary system. Even though intersex conditions exist, they are rare developmental variations, not a third sex.
From this perspective, the claim that trans women are not women is an observation of physical reality. A person born with XY chromosomes who develops as a male cannot later become a female, regardless of hormones or surgery. They argue that "woman" refers specifically to the adult human female.
🔗 Read more: Johnny Somali AI Deepfake: What Really Happened in South Korea
Take JK Rowling, for example. She’s become the most famous face of this viewpoint. She hasn't backed down, despite immense pressure. She argues that erasing the concept of biological sex makes it impossible to discuss the reality of women's lives globally—things like menstruation, childbirth, and the specific types of male violence women face.
Then you have someone like Dr. Kathleen Stock, a philosopher who had to leave her university job because of her views on this. She argues that "woman" is a biological category and that we shouldn't confuse it with "gender," which is a set of social stereotypes. If you define "woman" as anyone who feels like a woman, she argues, the word loses its meaning. It becomes circular.
The impact on women’s sports and fair competition
This is where the rubber really hits the road. Sports.
You’ve likely heard of Lia Thomas, the swimmer from the University of Pennsylvania. When Thomas began competing on the women’s team after transitioning, it sent shockwaves through the sporting world.
The argument that trans women are not women—at least in a biological and competitive sense—is gaining serious traction in athletic governing bodies. The World Aquatics (formerly FINA) and World Athletics (track and field) have both moved to restrict trans women who have gone through male puberty from competing in female categories.
Why? Because of "male-linked skeletal and muscular advantages."
Research, such as studies by Dr. Emma Hilton and Dr. Tommy Lundberg, suggests that even after suppressive hormone therapy, biological males retain significant advantages in bone density, lung capacity, and muscle mass. Testosterone suppression doesn't "undo" the changes of male puberty.
💡 You might also like: Sweden School Shooting 2025: What Really Happened at Campus Risbergska
- Increased heart size.
- Wider shoulders.
- Greater grip strength.
- Longer limbs.
For many female athletes, like former Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies, allowing trans women to compete is fundamentally unfair. They argue that the female category was created to protect biological females from having to compete against the physiological advantages of the male sex. In their view, saying trans women are not women in the context of sports is simply about preserving the integrity of women's competition.
The legal battle: Title IX and protected spaces
The legal landscape is a mess right now. Basically, it’s a tug-of-war.
The Biden administration recently attempted to update Title IX regulations to include "gender identity" under the umbrella of sex discrimination. This would essentially codify the idea that trans women must be treated as women in all educational settings, including sports and private spaces like locker rooms.
However, several states sued. Judges in states like Louisiana and Kentucky have blocked these changes. These courts have ruled that "sex" in Title IX, written in 1972, clearly referred to biological sex, not identity.
In these legal filings, the argument is often explicitly made: trans women are not women for the purposes of the law. If a law was designed to provide opportunities for biological females (who were historically excluded), then expanding that law to include biological males who identify as women might actually undermine the very group the law was meant to help.
Think about domestic violence shelters. Or prisons.
In California, a law (SB 132) allowed inmates to be housed according to their gender identity. This led to reports of biological men, some with histories of sexual violence, being placed in women’s prisons. Groups like Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF) have been fighting this, arguing that the safety and privacy of biological women are being sacrificed for the sake of an ideology.
📖 Related: Will Palestine Ever Be Free: What Most People Get Wrong
Different perspectives: Why the debate is so polarized
It’s easy to think this is just "bigotry vs. progress." But it’s deeper.
Many trans people and their allies see the phrase trans women are not women as an act of "erasure" or "violence." They point to the high rates of depression and suicide among trans youth. They believe that affirming someone’s identity is a matter of basic human dignity and life-saving healthcare.
They argue that "womanhood" is a broad tent. If we exclude trans women, where do we stop? Do we exclude women who can’t have children? Women with PCOS who have high testosterone?
On the flip side, many feminists—often called Radical Feminists or Gender Critical Feminists—feel that their identity is being "colonized." They see the push to include trans women in women-only spaces as a new form of patriarchy. They argue that a man who transitions at 30 has still had 30 years of "male socialization" and male privilege, which a biological woman never had.
Moving forward: What to actually do with this information
So, where does this leave you? Whether you're a parent, an athlete, or just someone trying to keep up with the news, the debate over whether trans women are not women is going to remain a hot-button issue for years.
It’s not going away.
If you want to understand this better, don't just stay in your echo chamber. Read the actual rulings. Look at the data.
Actionable steps for the curious:
- Read the FINA (World Aquatics) policy: It’s a 30-page document that explains exactly why they decided to limit the female category to those who haven't experienced male puberty. It’s heavy on science and light on slogans.
- Follow the court cases: Keep an eye on the 11th Circuit and the Supreme Court. They are currently deciding how "sex" is defined in federal law. This will affect every school and workplace in America.
- Look at international shifts: Countries like the UK, Sweden, and Finland have recently pulled back on "gender-affirming care" for minors, citing a lack of long-term evidence. They are moving toward a more cautious, therapy-first approach.
- Engage with the "Gender Critical" view: Read books like Material Girls by Kathleen Stock or The Abolition of Sex by Kara Dansky to understand the feminist argument against gender identity.
- Engage with the "Trans Affirming" view: Look at the work of Julia Serano (specifically Whipping Girl) to see the counter-arguments about how transphobia and sexism intersect.
The conversation is shifting from "feelings" to "function." We are seeing a return to biological definitions in specific areas—like high-stakes sports and medical safeguards—while the social debate over identity continues to rage. Understanding the distinction between "gender identity" and "biological sex" is the only way to navigate this without getting lost in the noise.