Robert Munsch almost didn't write it. Seriously. Back in the late 1970s, the world of children's literature was basically a repetitive loop of "damsel in distress meets shiny knight." Then came Elizabeth. She wasn't just another princess; she was a messy, soot-covered girl wearing a literal paper bag because a dragon torched her castle and kidnapped her fiancé, Ronald.
It changed everything.
The Paper Bag Princess isn't just a book you find in a dusty corner of a library; it's a subversion of every trope we grew up with. Most people remember the ending—the "bum" comment—but the actual depth of why this story stuck the landing in 1980 and still sells thousands of copies every year is a bit more complex. It's about agency. Real agency.
The Story That Flipped the Script
If you haven't read it lately, here is the gist. Princess Elizabeth is set to marry Prince Ronald. A dragon shows up, burns the palace, and takes Ronald away. Elizabeth, left with nothing but a paper bag to wear, tracks the dragon down. She doesn't fight him with a sword. She uses her brain.
She tricks the dragon into exhausting himself. He flies around the world until he falls asleep, and then she walks right into the cave to get her man.
But Ronald? Ronald is a jerk.
He looks at her—messy hair, smelling like ash, wearing a grocery bag—and tells her to come back when she looks like a "real" princess. Elizabeth, in what is arguably the greatest exit line in children's lit history, tells him his clothes are pretty and his hair is neat, but he is a bum. They don't get married. They don't live happily ever after in the traditional sense.
She skips off into the sunset. Alone. And happy.
💡 You might also like: Not the Nine O'Clock News: Why the Satirical Giant Still Matters
Why the "Bum" Line Was a Massive Risk
When Robert Munsch was working at a family studies lab at the University of Guelph, he told stories to kids all day. The Paper Bag Princess grew out of those sessions. But here is the thing: his wife, Ann Beeler, was the one who suggested the ending. Originally, it was going to be a more traditional "they get married" vibe.
Ann pushed for the reversal.
Publishers initially hated it. They thought it was too aggressive. They thought kids wouldn't "get it." But they were wrong. Kids, especially young girls in the 80s who were tired of being told to keep their dresses clean, absolutely latched onto it. It wasn't just a "feminist" book—though it definitely is that—it was a story about recognizing when someone doesn't value you.
Honestly, Ronald is the blueprint for every "toxic" partner we talk about today. He’s obsessed with the aesthetic of the relationship rather than the person who literally just saved his life from a giant lizard.
The Art of Michael Martchenko
We have to talk about the illustrations. Michael Martchenko’s art is what makes the dragon feel like a real threat and a goofball at the same time. The scale of the dragon compared to Elizabeth in that paper bag is crucial. It visualizes the power imbalance that Elizabeth eventually overcomes through pure wit.
If you look closely at the original prints, the dragon looks genuinely exhausted. The tongues of fire getting smaller and smaller as Elizabeth goads him into "one more time" is a masterclass in visual storytelling.
It’s gritty. It’s dirty.
📖 Related: New Movies in Theatre: What Most People Get Wrong About This Month's Picks
Elizabeth’s hair is a tangled mess of black scribbles. Compare that to the pristine, tennis-outfit-wearing Ronald. The visual contrast tells the story before you even read the words. It shows that the "hero" is the one who did the work, not the one who stayed clean.
The Global Impact (By the Numbers)
This isn't just a Canadian classic. It’s a global phenomenon.
- Over 7 million copies sold worldwide.
- Translated into dozens of languages, including Braille.
- Regularly cited by organizations like the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) as a cornerstone for teaching character analysis.
What’s wild is that the book has been challenged in some places. Believe it or not, some groups tried to ban it because it "undermined the institution of marriage" or showed "disrespect to authority." Imagine being threatened by a girl in a bag.
What Modern Readers Get Wrong
A lot of people think the book is about hating men. That’s a lazy take.
The story is actually about discernment. Elizabeth was perfectly happy to marry Ronald until he showed his true colors. The lesson isn't "don't get married," it’s "don't marry someone who thinks your value is tied to your outfit."
It’s also one of the earliest examples of a "trickster" narrative where the protagonist is female. Usually, the "smart one who outwits the monster" was a Jack or a Puss-in-Boots. Giving that role to Elizabeth without making her a "warrior princess" with a bow and arrow was revolutionary. She didn't need a weapon. She just needed to know how a dragon's ego works.
Real-World Lessons from a 27-Page Picture Book
We can learn a lot from how Elizabeth handled that dragon. She didn't confront him when he was at full strength. She waited. She poked at his pride. She asked him if he was really the smartest and fastest dragon in the world.
👉 See also: A Simple Favor Blake Lively: Why Emily Nelson Is Still the Ultimate Screen Mystery
That’s a negotiation tactic.
In business and in life, the "Paper Bag Princess" method is basically "let the dragon burn himself out." Don't fight the fire; wait for the embers.
- Assess the "Prince": If you’ve just done something incredible and the people around you are only complaining about the "mess" you made, you’re dealing with a Ronald.
- Use Your Assets: Elizabeth used a bag because it was all she had. Use what you have. Efficiency over elegance every single time.
- Walk Away: The most powerful move Elizabeth makes isn't defeating the dragon—it's skipping away from the guy who didn't deserve her.
The legacy of The Paper Bag Princess is in that final skip. It tells every kid—and every adult who reads it to them—that being alone is infinitely better than being with someone who makes you feel small.
Practical Steps to Revisit the Classic
If you're looking to share this with a new generation or just want to appreciate it as an adult, start by looking for the 40th-anniversary editions. They often include notes from Robert Munsch about the storytelling process at the University of Guelph.
Next, compare the "Elizabeth" archetype to modern characters like Katniss Everdeen or Elsa. You’ll notice that while those characters are great, they often rely on magic or combat skills. Elizabeth is still unique because she wins using nothing but her voice and a bit of psychological manipulation.
Check your local independent bookstore. This is one of those titles that keeps "indies" alive because it’s a perennial bestseller that parents specifically ask for by name. It’s a foundational text for a reason.
Don't just read the words; look at Ronald's face in the last few pages. He looks confused. He can't fathom that a girl wouldn't want him just because he's a prince. That confusion is the sound of a tired trope dying. Elizabeth didn't just save herself; she saved us from boring stories.
Next Steps for Readers
To truly appreciate the impact of this work, look into the "Munsch at Home" archives or listen to the author's own narration of the story. His performance adds a layer of manic energy to the dragon and a biting dryness to Elizabeth’s dialogue that makes the "bum" reveal even more satisfying. If you're an educator, use the text to discuss "internal vs. external" traits—it remains the most effective tool for that lesson in the K-3 curriculum.