Quentin Tarantino loves a good fairy tale. You can tell by the title, right? But for anyone who actually lived through 1969, or even those of us who grew up obsessed with true crime, seeing the Once Upon a Time in Hollywood Manson Family depiction was... weird. It was jarring. It was a revisionist fever dream that took one of the most soul-crushing nights in American history and decided to punch it in the face.
Honestly, it’s a ballsy move.
Most filmmakers treat the Tate-LaBianca murders with a sort of somber, hushed reverence or, worse, cheap exploitation. Tarantino went a different way. He turned the monsters into punchlines. He took these figures who have loomed over the California psyche for fifty years—Tex Watson, Sadie, Katie—and made them look like absolute idiots. It’s cathartic, sure, but it also raises a ton of questions about what actually happened versus what we saw on screen.
The Spahn Ranch Vibe Check
If you’ve seen the movie, you remember the scene where Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt) drives Pussycat to the ranch. It’s tense. It feels like a horror movie. And honestly, that’s probably the most accurate part of the whole Once Upon a Time in Hollywood Manson Family subplot.
The real Spahn Ranch wasn't just some hippie commune. It was a crumbling movie set owned by George Spahn, who was, in fact, nearly blind and elderly. Tarantino nailed the dusty, desperate atmosphere of that place. By 1969, the "Summer of Love" was dead. It was rotting. The people living at Spahn Ranch weren't just "flower children"; they were runaways and outcasts being manipulated by a failed musician with a messiah complex.
When Cliff walks into that house to check on George, the hostility is palpable. That’s real. Squeaky Fromme—played by Dakota Fanning in a terrifyingly still performance—really was that devoted to George (and Charlie). The film captures that specific brand of cult-like territorialism. You aren't welcome here. You're an outsider. You're "The Man."
Who was actually there?
The movie introduces us to a few key players. You’ve got Pussycat (Margaret Qualley), who is a composite character but echoes the real-life "Family" girls like Linda Kasabian or Sandra Good. Then you have the heavy hitters:
💡 You might also like: Is Steven Weber Leaving Chicago Med? What Really Happened With Dean Archer
- Tex Watson: The "right-hand man."
- Susan Atkins (Sadie): The one who, in real life, was chillingly boastful about the crimes.
- Patricia Krenwinkel (Katie): A devoted follower who stayed with the cult until the very end.
In the film, they are presented as bumbling, almost pathetic figures. The real Tex Watson was a high school athlete from Texas who became a cold-blooded killer. Seeing him get his face smashed in by a stuntman’s pit bull is a "what if" that many people found deeply satisfying, even if it strayed miles from the police reports.
Breaking Down the "Revisionist History" Problem
Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: the ending.
In the real world, the Once Upon a Time in Hollywood Manson Family members didn't get lost and decide to attack a fictional stuntman instead. They went to 10050 Cielo Drive. They murdered Sharon Tate, who was eight-and-a-half months pregnant, along with Jay Sebring, Abigail Folger, Wojciech Frykowski, and Steven Parent.
It was a massacre. It ended the sixties.
Tarantino’s decision to have the killers target Rick Dalton’s house instead is a massive piece of wish fulfillment. He uses the character of Francesca Capucci and the presence of a very hungry pit bull to rewrite a tragedy. Why? Because in Tarantino’s world, cinema has the power to fix things. If a legendary Western actor and his tough-as-nails stunt double lived next door, maybe the world wouldn't have broken that night.
It’s a controversial take. Some critics, like those at The New Yorker, argued that it trivializes the real victims by turning their potential deaths into a background plot point for a buddy comedy. Others, however, felt that by denying the Manson Family their "fame" and showing them being obliterated by the very "Hollywood" they hated, Tarantino gave the victims a weird sort of posthumous protection. He took the spotlight off the killers and put it back on the vibrant, living version of Sharon Tate (played with incredible lightness by Margot Robbie).
📖 Related: Is Heroes and Villains Legit? What You Need to Know Before Buying
The Charles Manson Cameo That Wasn't
Notice something about the movie? Charles Manson is barely in it.
Damon Herriman plays Charlie, appearing in only one brief scene where he pulls up to the Tate residence in a delivery truck, looking for Terry Melcher. He has maybe two lines.
This was a deliberate choice.
By making the Once Upon a Time in Hollywood Manson Family plot about the "kids" rather than the "leader," the film avoids the trap of mythologizing Manson. For decades, Manson has been treated like a dark superstar. Books like Helter Skelter by Vincent Bugliosi (the prosecutor in the case) painted him as a mastermind. More recent deep dives, like Tom O’Neill’s book CHAOS: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties, suggest the story was way more complicated, involving drug circles, possible government surveillance, and a lot of legal incompetence.
Tarantino isn't interested in the conspiracy theories. He’s interested in the vibe. By keeping Manson as a peripheral, almost pathetic figure in the background, he strips away the "Boogeyman" status. Manson is just a guy who couldn't get a record deal. That’s the reality. He was a small, manipulative man who took advantage of vulnerable teenagers.
Accuracy vs. Art: What They Got Right
Even though the ending is pure fiction, the details leading up to it are surprisingly accurate.
👉 See also: Jack Blocker American Idol Journey: What Most People Get Wrong
- The Wardrobe: The costumes for the Family members were based heavily on police photos and footage from the documentary Manson. The frayed denim, the bare feet, the unwashed hair—it’s all there.
- The Car: That beat-up 1959 Ford Galaxie the killers drive? It’s a dead ringer for the one actually used on the night of August 8, 1969.
- The Dialogue: When Tex Watson says, "I'm the devil, and I'm here to do the devil's business," that is a real quote attributed to him during the Tate murders. Hearing it in the context of a movie where he’s about to be mauled by a dog is surreal. It’s a collision of horrific reality and cinematic justice.
The film also captures the weird intersection of Hollywood and the counterculture. People forget that Dennis Wilson of the Beach Boys actually lived with the Manson Family for a while. Terry Melcher, a huge producer and son of Doris Day, really did scout Manson for a record deal. The "Family" wasn't some isolated group in the woods; they were orbiting the fringes of the industry. They were the dark reflection of the glitz and glamour.
Why We Keep Looking Back
Why does the Once Upon a Time in Hollywood Manson Family story still resonate?
Maybe it’s because it represents the moment the "American Dream" curdled. Before that night in August, people in the Canyon didn't lock their doors. After? Everything changed. Security guards, high fences, and a general sense of paranoia took over.
Tarantino’s film is a time machine. He wants us to spend time with Sharon Tate—not as a victim, but as a person. We see her go to the movies. We see her dance. We see her buy a book. By the time the Manson followers show up at the end, we are so invested in the world he built that we need the ending to be fake. We want the dog to win. We want the flamethrower.
What to do with this information
If you're fascinated by this era, don't just stop at the movie. To get a real sense of the history, you should look into the actual accounts of those involved.
- Read "Member of the Family" by Dianne Lake. She was the youngest member of the group and provides a harrowing, non-sensationalized look at how the brainwashing actually worked.
- Listen to the "You Must Remember This" podcast. Karina Longworth’s multi-part series on Charles Manson is widely considered the gold standard for understanding the Hollywood context of the crimes.
- Visit the Los Angeles locations (if you're a local). Many of the spots, like the El Coyote restaurant where the Tate party had their last meal, are still standing. Seeing them in person makes the "fairytale" version in the movie feel even more poignant.
The movie isn't a documentary. It never claimed to be. It’s an act of cinematic revenge against a group of people who destroyed the innocence of an entire generation. Whether you love the ending or find it distasteful, you can't deny that it forced us to look at the Manson Family through a different lens: not as icons of evil, but as losers who finally picked a fight with the wrong house.
The reality was much darker, but for two and a half hours, Tarantino let us pretend that the good guys won and the sixties never had to end. That's the power of the "Once Upon a Time" prefix. It's not history. It's hope.