Liberty isn't a gift. It's not something that just happens because a group of smart people sat in a room in Philadelphia and wrote on parchment. Honestly, if you look at human history, liberty is a weird anomaly. It’s a freak accident.
Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, the minds behind Why Nations Fail, spent years trying to figure out why some countries thrive while others rot under the boots of dictators or dissolve into tribal chaos. Their book, The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty, basically argues that freedom exists only in a tiny, precarious sliver of space.
On one side, you have the "Leviathan"—a state so powerful it crushes everyone. Think North Korea. On the other side, you’ve got "Absence"—a world with no central authority where life is, as Hobbes put it, "nasty, brutish, and short." You don't want either. You want to be in the corridor. But staying there is a constant, exhausting wrestling match between the state and the people.
The Red Queen Effect: Running to Stay Still
Most people think of the state as a container. You build the walls, you set the rules, and you live inside. Acemoglu and Robinson say that’s wrong.
They use an analogy from Alice in Wonderland called the Red Queen Effect. In the book, the Red Queen tells Alice, "It takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place." This is exactly how liberty works. For the state to get more capable—to build roads, enforce laws fairly, and provide healthcare—society has to get more powerful too. If the state grows but society stays weak, you end up with despotism. If society grows but the state stays weak, you get anarchy or "The Cage of Norms."
It’s a race.
Imagine the state is a wild horse. You want it strong so it can carry you across the desert. But if you don't have the strength to pull the reins, that horse is going to trample you or throw you off a cliff. To keep liberty, society must constantly "run" to keep up with the state's power. It’s not a one-time deal. It’s a struggle that literally never ends.
The Despotic Leviathan vs. The Paper Leviathan
We usually think of dictatorships as "strong" states. They have big parades and lots of tanks. But the authors make a really interesting distinction here. Some states are "Despotic Leviathans." They are strong against their own people but often incredibly fragile or inefficient when it actually comes to solving problems.
Then you have the "Paper Leviathan."
💡 You might also like: Why a Man Hits Girl for Bullying Incidents Go Viral and What They Reveal About Our Breaking Point
This is a state that looks powerful on paper but can't actually get anything done. Think of many post-colonial nations where the bureaucracy is massive, but nothing works unless you pay a bribe. The state is present enough to be annoying and extractive, but absent when it comes to providing actual security or justice. It’s a ghost in the machine.
Liberty doesn't live in either of those houses.
It lives in the "Shackled Leviathan." This is a state that is powerful—it can tax, it can wage war, it can build massive infrastructure—but it is tied down by laws, elections, and an active, loud, annoying citizenry. The "shackles" aren't just laws written on a page; they are the actual power of people to say "no" and make it stick.
Why The Corridor is So Narrow
Why is it so hard to get into the corridor? Most of human history has been spent outside of it.
Take a look at the "Cage of Norms." This is a concept Acemoglu and Robinson use to describe societies where there is no central state, but people are still unfree. In these places, liberty isn't crushed by a king; it’s crushed by tradition, superstition, and rigid social hierarchies. You can’t start a new business because it violates a taboo. You can’t marry who you want because of tribal rules. You’re "free" from a dictator, but you’re a prisoner of your own culture.
Breaking out of that cage usually requires a state to step in and provide universal laws. But the moment the state steps in, it starts trying to build its own cage.
It’s a trap.
The European experience—which the authors analyze heavily—was a bit of a fluke. It happened because the crumbling Roman structures (the state) met the egalitarian, assembly-based traditions of the Germanic tribes (society). They balanced each other out by accident. It wasn't some European "superiority"; it was a specific historical collision that pushed them into the corridor.
📖 Related: Why are US flags at half staff today and who actually makes that call?
The Warning for Modern Democracies
We're getting complacent.
There's this dangerous idea that once you’re in the corridor, you stay there forever. That liberty is the "natural" state of a modern country.
It’s not.
Look at what’s happening in Hungary or Turkey. These were countries that many thought were firmly in the corridor. But the state started outrunning society. It took over the courts. It bought up the media. It used the "Red Queen" logic in reverse—the state ran faster while society sat down to rest.
Even in the United States or the UK, the "shackles" are feeling a bit loose lately. When trust in institutions drops, people start looking for a "strongman" to fix things. But a strongman is just a Despotic Leviathan with a better PR team. Once you let the Leviathan off the leash, getting the shackles back on is a bloody, multi-generational project.
Real-World Examples: The Tale of Two Cities
The authors often point to the difference between how states handle local issues to show where they sit in relation to the corridor.
In a Shackled Leviathan (like Denmark), if there’s a problem with the water supply, the state fixes it because the citizens demand it, and the state has the technical capacity to do it. In a Despotic Leviathan (like China), the state fixes the water supply if it serves the party’s interests, but if you complain about it too loudly, you might disappear. In a Paper Leviathan (like parts of Nigeria or Lebanon), the water stays dirty, the money for the pipes is stolen, and you’re told to be grateful the state exists at all.
This isn't just academic theory. It’s the difference between a life of dignity and a life of fear or squalor.
👉 See also: Elecciones en Honduras 2025: ¿Quién va ganando realmente según los últimos datos?
How to Stay in the Corridor
You’ve gotta be active. That’s the "actionable insight" here, though it sounds like a cliché.
Liberty depends on the "Will to Power" of the common person. If you check out of politics, if you stop caring about local school boards or how your taxes are spent, you are effectively lengthening the leash on the Leviathan.
- Protect Local Institutions: The corridor is wider when power is decentralized. When everything is run from a single capital city, it’s much easier for the state to outrun society.
- Watch the Norms, Not Just the Laws: Laws are just paper. Liberty survives because of norms—the unwritten rules about what a leader can and cannot do. When norms break, the corridor narrows instantly.
- Demand State Capacity: Being "anti-government" isn't the same as being "pro-liberty." You need a state that can actually do things. A weak, incompetent state leads to a "Paper Leviathan" or a return to the "Cage of Norms." You want a state that is strong but strictly house-trained.
The Fate of Liberty in an Algorithmic Age
We’re entering a new era where the state has tools that Nero or Stalin couldn't even dream of. AI, facial recognition, and total digital surveillance mean the Leviathan can now see inside your head.
The "Red Queen" race just got a lot faster.
If society doesn't develop its own technological and social "shackles" to counter this digital power, the corridor might just close up for good. We can't rely on the old ways of protesting or voting to keep a 21st-century Leviathan in check. We need new ways to run.
The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty teaches us that we aren't at the "end of history." We’re in a permanent state of emergency. Freedom is a high-wire act, and we’re the ones holding the balance pole.
Actionable Takeaways for Preserving Liberty
To apply the lessons of the corridor to the real world, focus on these shifts in perspective:
- Move beyond the "Small Government" vs. "Big Government" debate. The goal isn't the size of the government, but its responsiveness. A small government that can't protect rights is just as dangerous as a large one that tramples them.
- Strengthen "Counter-Vailing Powers." Support independent unions, local journalism, and non-profits. These are the muscles society uses to pull back on the state's reins.
- Identify "The Cage of Norms" in your own life. Are there social pressures or traditional structures preventing progress in your community? Sometimes the "state" isn't the one holding you back; it's the lack of a neutral, legal framework to replace tribalism.
- Monitor "Institutional Drift." Watch for small changes in how courts or regulatory agencies operate. The move out of the corridor rarely happens with a coup; it happens with a thousand small "adjustments" to the rules.
The corridor is narrow, and the walls are moving. Stay awake.