Agatha Christie hated this book. She genuinely, deeply loathed it. Writing it was a slog for her, coming right off the back of her famous disappearance in 1926 and the messy collapse of her first marriage. She called it "easily the worst book I ever wrote." But here’s the thing: she was wrong. The Mystery of the Blue Train might have been a "painful duty" for a grieving author, but for the rest of us, it’s a foundational piece of the Hercule Poirot mythos that basically invented the "luxury travel murder" trope we still see in movies like Glass Onion today.
It’s got everything. A cursed ruby. A train hurtling toward the French Riviera. A spoiled heiress. A cheating husband. If you’ve seen the David Suchet adaptation, you know the vibe. It’s lush. It’s expensive. It’s tragic.
The Mystery of the Blue Train: More Than Just a Rewrite
A lot of people don’t realize that this novel is actually an expanded version of a short story Christie wrote earlier called The Plymouth Express. If you read them back-to-back, the bones are the same. A woman is found dead under a seat, her jewels are gone, and the train keeps rolling. But the 1928 novel adds layers of grit and social commentary that the short story lacked.
Ruth Kettering is the victim. She’s the daughter of Rufus Van Aldin, an American millionaire who is probably the only person in the world Poirot actually finds intimidating. Van Aldin buys his daughter the "Heart of Fire" ruby—a stone with a history of bad luck. Naturally, Ruth ends up dead on the Le Train Bleu, the luxury express from London to the Riviera. Her face is smashed beyond recognition. It’s a brutal, messy crime in a setting that’s supposed to be the height of sophistication.
Why Poirot is different here
In this book, Poirot isn't just a caricature. He’s retired. Or at least, he’s trying to be. He’s traveling to the south of France to escape the damp English winter, and he happens to meet Katherine Grey, a woman who just inherited a small fortune and is finally seeing the world.
Katherine is the heart of the book. Honestly, she’s one of Christie’s best female characters because she isn’t a damsel. She’s observant. Poirot treats her like an equal, which is rare for him. He tells her, "Mademoiselle, you have the eyes that see." That’s high praise from a guy who thinks he’s the smartest person in any room.
The Riviera Setting and the Real-Life Inspiration
The Train Bleu wasn’t just a figment of Christie's imagination. It was the premier luxury train of the 1920s, operated by the Compagnie Internationale des Wagons-Lits. It took the wealthy from Victoria Station in London all the way to the sun-drenched casinos of Nice and Monte Carlo.
📖 Related: Big Brother 27 Morgan: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
Christie wrote what she knew. She spent time in the Canary Islands and the south of France while trying to recover from her mental health crisis. You can feel that exhaustion in the prose. The descriptions of the French coast aren’t just travelogues; they’re tinted with a sort of melancholy that makes the murder feel more poignant.
The "Heart of Fire" Ruby
Is the ruby real? Sorta. Christie loved using historical jewelry as a plot device. While the "Heart of Fire" is fictional, it’s clearly inspired by the legendary Hope Diamond or the Black Prince’s Ruby. In the book, the stone is supposedly a Romanoff treasure. It adds a layer of "international intrigue" that became a staple of the Golden Age of detective fiction. The idea that an object carries a curse is a classic red herring. Poirot, being a man of logic, scoffs at curses. He looks at the people, not the gems.
Why Fans Keep Coming Back to it (Despite the Author's Hate)
If you ask a hardcore Christie fan to rank the Poirot novels, The Mystery of the Blue Train usually sits somewhere in the middle. It’s not as groundbreaking as The Murder of Roger Ackroyd and not as perfectly paced as Murder on the Orient Express. But it has a specific charm.
It’s the "comfort food" of murder mysteries.
- The suspects are clearly defined.
- The red herrings are clever but fair.
- The ending is a genuine "aha!" moment.
Derek Kettering, the husband, is the obvious suspect. He’s broke, he’s a gambler, and he’s cheating on Ruth. Then there’s the "Comte" de la Roche, a professional conman. It seems too simple. And in a Christie novel, if it’s simple, you’re being tricked.
The psychology of the killer
Without spoiling the identity for the three people who haven't read it yet, the killer’s motivation is fascinating. It’s not just about the money. It’s about the audacity. The killer in this book relies on the fact that people only see what they expect to see. They use the mechanical nature of train travel—the stops, the tickets, the schedules—to create a physical impossibility.
👉 See also: The Lil Wayne Tracklist for Tha Carter 3: What Most People Get Wrong
Poirot’s brilliance here is noticing the "small stuff." A cigarette case. A conversation about a child. The way someone sits. It’s the "little grey cells" at their most observant.
Breaking Down the "Bad Book" Myth
Why did Agatha Christie hate it so much? She was going through a divorce from Archie Christie. She was broke (or thought she was). She had just lost her mother. She had to write this book to fulfill a contract, and every word felt like pulling teeth.
She once said that she always felt like a "guilty person" when people praised the book. But looking at it with 21st-century eyes, that struggle actually improved the story. There is a hardness to this book that is missing from her more whimsical mysteries. The tragedy of Ruth Kettering feels real because the author was experiencing her own version of a life falling apart.
The Suchet Effect
We have to talk about the 2005 television adaptation. David Suchet, who is basically the definitive Poirot, brought a level of gravitas to this story that helped cement its reputation. The TV version takes some liberties—it adds more drama to the "cursed" element of the ruby—but it captures the aesthetic perfectly. The Art Deco trains, the silk gowns, the sharp contrast between the bright Mediterranean sun and the dark, cramped train corridors. It’s peak "Cozy Mystery" but with a sharp edge.
Comparing The Blue Train to Orient Express
People always compare these two because of the trains. But they are polar opposites.
Orient Express is a "closed room" mystery. Everyone is trapped. The solution is a group effort.
The Mystery of the Blue Train is sprawling. It starts in London, moves to Paris, hits the rails, and ends in the villas of the Riviera. It’s more of a traditional thriller. If Orient Express is a play, Blue Train is a movie.
The stakes in Blue Train feel more personal. In Orient Express, Poirot is an outsider looking in on a moral dilemma. In Blue Train, he becomes a protector of Katherine Grey. He’s looking out for her like a weird, mustachioed uncle.
✨ Don't miss: Songs by Tyler Childers: What Most People Get Wrong
Actionable Insights for Christie Newbies
If you're looking to dive into the world of The Mystery of the Blue Train Agatha Christie style, here is how to get the most out of it.
First, don't just read the book. Listen to the BBC Radio 4 dramatization if you can find it. Maurice Denham plays Poirot, and the sound design of the train tracks really sets the mood. It’s immersive.
Second, pay attention to the character of Katherine Grey. She appears in a few other contexts in Christie’s universe (conceptually), but here she represents the "Modern Woman" of the 1920s. She’s independent and smart. Her interaction with the wealthy elite of the Riviera provides a great look at the class dynamics of the era.
Third, look for the clues regarding the "fourth person" in the carriage. Christie is a master of the "hidden in plain sight" clue.
Finally, check out the real-life history of the Blue Train. It stopped running as a luxury service in the early 2000s, but the history of the line is fascinating. It was the way the elite traveled before commercial flight took over. Knowing how long those stops in Lyon or Marseille actually took helps you understand the timeline of the murder.
The Lasting Legacy
Agatha Christie might have wanted to burn the manuscript, but the literary world is glad she didn't. This book bridged the gap between her early, somewhat derivative works and the "Queen of Crime" status she achieved in the 1930s. It proved that Poirot could carry a heavy, complex narrative even when the author’s heart wasn’t in it.
It teaches us that even when we feel like our work is "forced" or "bad," it might still resonate with someone else in a way we can't predict. For Christie, it was a paycheck and a chore. For us, it’s a window into a vanished world of glamour, rubies, and the most famous detective in history.
To truly appreciate the story, your next step should be to look up the 1920s floor plans of a Wagons-Lits carriage. Seeing how small those compartments were makes the logistics of the murder much more impressive. After that, pick up The Plymouth Express short story and compare the two endings. You'll see exactly how Christie took a simple "whodunnit" and turned it into a full-scale psychological study of greed and loneliness.