Albert Finney was only 38 years old when he sat in a makeup chair for hours every morning to become an elderly, eccentric Belgian. Most people forget that. When we talk about the Murder on the Orient Express 1974 cast, we’re usually talking about the sheer, overwhelming density of Oscar winners crammed into a few narrow train compartments. It shouldn't have worked. Honestly, putting that many massive egos in a confined space usually leads to a mess of a movie where everyone tries to out-act each other. But Sidney Lumet, a director who basically specialized in high-tension environments, managed to turn this ensemble into a clockwork mechanism.
It’s the definitive version. Sorry to the Kenneth Branagh fans, but there’s a texture to the 1974 group that feels like actual history, not a green-screen fever dream. You’ve got royalty—literal acting royalty—like Ingrid Bergman and Wendy Hiller rubbing shoulders with then-rising stars and established giants like Sean Connery.
The Belgian at the Center: Albert Finney’s Polarizing Poirot
Finney’s Hercule Poirot is... intense. If you’re used to the warmth of David Suchet or the mustache-forward approach of Branagh, Finney might shock you. He’s loud. He’s screechy. He’s incredibly stiff, almost like he’s physically encased in his own fastidiousness. Lumet reportedly wanted a Poirot that felt like a "limpet," something hard and impenetrable.
Getting the Murder on the Orient Express 1974 cast together started with Finney, but he wasn't the first choice. They wanted Alec Guinness. They wanted Paul Scofield. Finney took it and leaned into the caricature so hard it actually looped back around to being believable within the stylized world Agatha Christie created. He was nominated for an Academy Award for the role, and while some find his screaming matches at the end of the film a bit much, you can't deny the energy he injects into a script that is essentially 90 minutes of people sitting in chairs and talking.
Ingrid Bergman’s "Small" Role That Stole an Oscar
Here is a wild fact: Ingrid Bergman was originally offered the role of Princess Dragomiroff. She turned it down. She told Lumet she wanted to play Greta Ohlsson, the "backward" Swedish missionary. Lumet thought she was crazy. Greta is a tiny role compared to the Princess. But Bergman was insistent. She wanted to play someone simple, someone who felt like a background character.
📖 Related: Despicable Me 2 Edith: Why the Middle Child is Secretly the Best Part of the Movie
She filmed her big interrogation scene in one long, five-minute take. One take. That’s it. That’s all she needed to secure the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress. It’s a masterclass in how a member of the Murder on the Orient Express 1974 cast could take a "lesser" part and make it the emotional heart of the film. Her nervous energy and that "little sheep" persona she adopted made the eventual revelation of the plot hit so much harder.
A Train Car Full of Legends
Let's look at the heavy hitters. You have Sean Connery as Colonel Arbuthnot. At this point, Connery was desperately trying to shed the James Bond skin. He’s rigid, Scottish, and perfectly matched with Vanessa Redgrave’s Mary Debenham. Their chemistry feels lived-in, which is vital because their secret relationship is one of the first threads Poirot starts to pull.
Then there’s Lauren Bacall. She plays Mrs. Hubbard, the loud American who won’t shut up. Bacall is essentially playing a version of her own public persona but dialed up to eleven. She’s the engine of the first half of the movie. While everyone else is being "British and Reserved," Bacall is tearing through the scenery.
- Wendy Hiller: Playing Princess Dragomiroff. She looks like a vulture draped in pearls. Her performance is almost entirely in her eyes and the way she holds her chin.
- Anthony Perkins: As Hector McQueen. Just a few years after Psycho, Perkins brings that same twitchy, nervous energy to the role of the secretary. You almost expect him to pull out a kitchen knife, but instead, he just fumbles with his notes.
- John Gielgud: The valet, Mr. Beddoes. Gielgud provides the "stiff upper lip" that the movie needs to balance out Bacall's noise.
Why This Ensemble Never Happens Anymore
Honestly, the budget for the Murder on the Orient Express 1974 cast today would be astronomical. In '74, these actors did it because it was a "prestige" project. They wanted to work with Lumet. They wanted to be in a Christie adaptation because, at the time, she was still the reigning queen of the bestseller lists (she actually attended the premiere, one of her final public appearances).
👉 See also: Death Wish II: Why This Sleazy Sequel Still Triggers People Today
The film doesn't rely on CGI or action beats. It relies on the "Kuleshov Effect"—basically, Lumet just cuts to different faces reacting to Poirot’s accusations. When you have faces like Richard Widmark (playing the victim, Ratchett) or Michael York, you don't need explosions. You just need a close-up. Widmark, by the way, is terrifyingly oily in this. He makes you want him to die within the first five minutes, which is exactly what the story requires.
The Craft Behind the Cast
It wasn't just about the names on the poster. Lumet used a specific lighting technique for each actor. He realized that the narrow corridors of the train cars were a nightmare for traditional filming. He used a lot of wide-angle lenses to make the sets feel cramped yet grand.
The costumes by Tony Walton were also essential. Each member of the Murder on the Orient Express 1974 cast was dressed to represent a specific social class and a specific lie. Look at the way Jacqueline Bisset’s Countess is draped in soft, ethereal fabrics compared to the sharp, military lines of Connery’s suit. The clothes tell the story before the actors even open their mouths.
Final Verdict on the 1974 Ensemble
If you’re going to watch one version of this story, this is it. The 2017 version has more "scale," sure. But the 1974 film has a soul. It has a group of actors who were mostly from the "Golden Age" of Hollywood and the theater, giving it a weight that modern productions struggle to replicate.
✨ Don't miss: Dark Reign Fantastic Four: Why This Weirdly Political Comic Still Holds Up
They weren't just playing characters; they were playing a game of chess. Every look, every sigh, and every sip of tea was a calculated move. Finney’s Poirot was the grandmaster, but he was nothing without his opponents.
Next Steps for the Cinephile
To truly appreciate what this cast accomplished, you should watch the "making of" segments often included in the 40th-anniversary Blu-ray releases. Specifically, look for the interviews with Sidney Lumet where he discusses the "interrogation" blocking.
After that, compare the final "reveal" scene in the 1974 version to the 2017 version. Notice how Lumet keeps the camera at eye level, making you feel like you are sitting at the table with the murderers, rather than the more theatrical, almost "Last Supper" style staging of the newer film. For a deeper dive into the period's production style, check out the memoirs of Lauren Bacall, where she briefly touches on the freezing sets in France that were used to simulate the Yugoslavian snowdrifts.