It was supposed to be the start of something massive. Universal Pictures had this grand plan called the "Dark Universe," and The Mummy Tom Cruise edition was the literal foundation of that entire world. You probably remember the grainy black-and-white photo of the cast—Cruise, Russell Crowe, Javier Bardem, Johnny Depp. It looked like a sure thing.
Then the movie actually came out.
Honestly, the 2017 reboot of The Mummy is one of the most fascinating case studies in modern Hollywood history. It’s not just a bad movie; it's a specific kind of corporate mess that happens when you try to build a franchise before you even have a good script. People still talk about it today, usually in the context of that viral trailer with the missing audio or the fact that it basically killed an entire cinematic universe in a single weekend.
The Identity Crisis of Nick Morton
The biggest problem with The Mummy Tom Cruise starred in was that nobody knew what kind of movie it wanted to be. Was it a horror movie? Not really. Was it a classic Cruise action flick? Kinda, but the supernatural stuff felt clunky.
Cruise plays Nick Morton, a soldier of fortune who accidentally stumbles upon the tomb of Ahmanet. Now, usually, a Tom Cruise character is the most capable guy in the room. He’s Ethan Hunt. He’s Maverick. But here, he’s basically a vessel for a cursed Egyptian princess. It felt off. Fans of the 1999 Brendan Fraser version wanted fun, adventurous swashbuckling. Fans of the original 1932 Boris Karloff version wanted atmospheric dread. What we got was a weird hybrid that spent more time setting up sequels than telling its own story.
The tonal whiplash is real. One minute, you have a terrifying scene of crows smashing through a plane windshield—which, by the way, was filmed in real zero-gravity environments because Cruise is a madman—and the next, you have weird slapstick humor with a ghost sidekick. It didn’t mesh.
The Zero-G Stunt and Practical Effects
If there is one thing you can’t take away from this movie, it’s the commitment to the stunts. We know Cruise doesn't do green screens if he can help it. For the famous plane crash sequence, the production actually used a "Vomit Comet" (a reduced-gravity aircraft).
They did 64 takes in zero gravity.
Most of the crew was reportedly nauseous or actually throwing up, but Cruise and co-star Annabelle Wallis kept going. That is the quintessential Tom Cruise experience. You see it on screen; the way the bodies float and slam against the fuselage isn't CGI. It’s real physics. This is arguably the best part of the movie, showing the sheer technical craftsmanship that goes into a production of this scale, even if the surrounding narrative is crumbling.
The makeup for Sofia Boutella’s Ahmanet was also genuinely impressive. They used intricate designs that weren't just digital overlays. She looked ancient and threatening. But even the coolest character design can't save a plot that feels like it was written by a committee trying to check off boxes for a multi-film "roadmap."
Why the Dark Universe Collapsed
The failure of The Mummy Tom Cruise wasn't just about the box office numbers, though they weren't great. It made about $409 million worldwide, which sounds like a lot until you realize the marketing budget was astronomical. The real death blow was the critical reception.
🔗 Read more: Is The Acolyte Good? Why This Star Wars Experiment Split the Galaxy in Two
Universal wanted a Marvel-style interconnected world. They even introduced Russell Crowe as Dr. Henry Jekyll (and Mr. Hyde) to act as the "Nick Fury" of the monster world. He headed an organization called Prodigium.
- The movie spent 20 minutes explaining Prodigium.
- It felt like an infomercial for a movie we hadn't seen yet.
- It distracted from the actual Mummy.
When audiences didn't show up with enthusiasm, Universal went silent. The planned Bride of Frankenstein movie was shelved. Johnny Depp’s Invisible Man was scrapped (later replaced by the much better, low-budget Blumhouse version). The "Dark Universe" logo that played before the film became a meme—a symbol of counting your chickens before they hatch.
Comparing the Versions: Fraser vs. Cruise
You can't talk about the 2017 version without mentioning 1999. Brendan Fraser’s Rick O’Connell was a lovable rogue. That movie had a "Raiders of the Lost Ark" energy. It was sunny, funny, and didn't take itself too seriously.
The Mummy Tom Cruise version was gray. It was set in modern-day London. It felt heavy and corporate. While the 1999 film felt like a labor of love, the 2017 film felt like a business strategy.
There's also the "Curse of the Leading Man" factor. In a horror movie, the monster should be the star. But when you hire the biggest movie star in the world, the movie becomes about him. Reports from Variety and other trade outlets at the time suggested Cruise had an incredible amount of control over the production, from the script to the editing room. This led to Nick Morton having a more "heroic" arc than the original script likely intended, which watered down the horror elements.
The Famous Trailer Fail
Who could forget the "no-audio" trailer? Shortly before release, a version of the trailer was uploaded to YouTube that was missing most of the sound effects and music. All you could hear were the raw vocal tracks of Tom Cruise and Annabelle Wallis screaming "Aaaah!" and "Uugh!" in the plane crash.
It went viral for all the wrong reasons. In a way, it was a perfect metaphor for the movie: a high-budget spectacle that felt hollow when you stripped away the noise.
What We Can Learn From the Mess
Looking back, The Mummy is a fascinating relic. It marks the exact moment Hollywood realized that not every IP needs to be a "Cinematic Universe." Sometimes, a movie should just be a movie.
✨ Don't miss: SpongeBob Titans of the Tide: Why This Rare Piece of Lost Media is Still Such a Mess
If you're a film student or just a casual fan, watching it today is actually a great lesson in tone. You can see the parts that work (the stunts, the creature design) battling the parts that don't (the world-building, the misplaced humor).
- Prioritize Story Over Franchise: Don't spend half your runtime setting up a sequel that might never happen.
- Match the Star to the Genre: Tom Cruise is great, but his "unstoppable hero" persona can sometimes clash with the vulnerability required for horror.
- Respect the Source Material: If you’re making a Mummy movie, let it be about the Mummy, not a secret government agency.
The Dark Universe is officially dead, replaced by a much more successful "one-at-a-time" approach by Universal and Blumhouse. They realized that smaller, director-driven horror like The Invisible Man (2020) works way better than a $200 million action-horror hybrid.
If you're going to revisit the film, do it for the zero-G stunt and the makeup work. Just don't expect it to lead anywhere. It's a dead end in the most literal sense of the word.
To really understand why this era of filmmaking happened, you should look into the "IP wars" of the mid-2010s. Every studio was desperate for their own MCU. Universal sat on the most iconic monsters in history—Dracula, Frankenstein, The Wolfman—and thought the Marvel formula was a "copy-paste" job. It wasn't. They forgot that Marvel started with Iron Man, a movie that focused on being a good movie first, and a franchise-starter second.
The Mummy Tom Cruise film will always be remembered as the project that tried to run before it could crawl. It’s a loud, expensive, well-acted, but ultimately confused piece of cinema history that changed how studios think about their classic characters.
Actionable Next Steps
- Watch the 1932 Original: If you want to see where the lore started, the Boris Karloff version is still genuinely creepy and focuses on atmosphere over explosions.
- Study the 1999 Script: For writers, the 1999 version is a masterclass in blending action, comedy, and romance. Compare it to the 2017 script to see how pacing affects audience engagement.
- Check out 'The Invisible Man' (2020): This is the "correct" way to reboot a Universal Monster. It focuses on a single, terrifying concept rather than building a universe, proving that smaller budgets often lead to better horror.