It’s been over a decade. Yet, if you close your eyes and think of 2013, one specific image probably flashes across your brain: a 20-year-old girl with a blonde pixie cut swinging on a giant piece of construction equipment. It was a cultural earthquake. When the Miley Cyrus I came in like a wrecking ball video dropped on September 9, 2013, it didn't just trend. It shattered the remains of the Disney Channel "Hannah Montana" image and paved the way for the modern era of pop music provocateurs.
People were furious. They were obsessed. They were deeply, deeply confused.
But looking back with the perspective of a 2026 lens, we can finally see that video for what it actually was: a masterclass in rebranding and raw, albeit controversial, vulnerability. It wasn't just about the nudity or the sledgehammer licking. Honestly, those were just the magnets used to pull us in so we’d actually listen to the lyrics of a devastatingly good power ballad.
The Director Behind the Chaos
A lot of people forget that the video was directed by Terry Richardson. This is a complicated part of the song's legacy. Richardson was already a massive, if polarizing, figure in fashion photography, known for a "raw" and often voyeuristic aesthetic. He used a simple white backdrop for the close-ups, which forced every single viewer to look directly into Miley’s eyes.
She’s crying. Not that fake, pretty "movie crying" where one perfect tear rolls down a cheek. Her eyes are bloodshot. Her nose is red. It feels uncomfortably real. That’s the Richardson influence—stripping away the pop star gloss to find something that feels like a nerve ending.
The contrast was jarring. You had these high-fashion, minimalist shots of her face mixed with the literal interpretation of the lyrics. She’s on a wrecking ball. She’s smashing walls. It’s literal, it’s metaphoric, and it was designed to be memed before "memeing" was even the primary way we consumed art.
Breaking the Vevo Record
Numbers don’t lie, and the stats for the Miley Cyrus I came in like a wrecking ball video were staggering. It hit 19.3 million views in its first 24 hours. At the time, that was a world record for Vevo. It reached 100 million views faster than any video before it.
Why? Because it was the ultimate "did you see that?" moment.
✨ Don't miss: Why the Cast of Hold Your Breath 2024 Makes This Dust Bowl Horror Actually Work
Parents were calling for boycotts. Critics were debating if it was feminist or exploitative. Meanwhile, Miley was just winning. She understood something that many artists today struggle with: in a crowded digital landscape, you have to be undeniable. You can hate it, or you can love it, but you cannot look away.
The Sledgehammer and the Symbolism
Let’s talk about the sledgehammer. You know the shot. It’s arguably the most parodied moment in music video history.
Critics at the time, like Camille Paglia, had a lot to say about the imagery. Some saw it as a desperate cry for attention. Others, including Miley herself in later interviews (like her 2017 conversation with NME), admitted to having a complicated relationship with the video. She once joked that she’ll always be "the girl on the wrecking ball," no matter how much she evolves.
But the symbolism of the video is actually quite simple. The wrecking ball represents the destructive nature of a one-sided love. The nakedness? It’s supposed to represent total emotional exposure. When you’re that hurt, you don’t have armor. You’re just... there. Exposed.
The Sinéad O'Connor "Nothing Compares 2 U" Connection
If you look at the opening shots of the Miley Cyrus I came in like a wrecking ball video, the inspiration is obvious. It’s a direct homage to Sinéad O'Connor’s "Nothing Compares 2 U." The tight framing on the face, the emotional intensity, the sparse background.
This actually led to a very public and very messy "open letter" feud between the two artists. O'Connor wrote to Miley, warning her about being "prostituted" by the music industry. Miley responded by referencing O'Connor's past mental health struggles. It was a low point in the rollout, but it highlighted the generational gap in how female empowerment and sexuality were viewed in the industry.
O'Connor saw exploitation; Miley saw agency.
🔗 Read more: Is Steven Weber Leaving Chicago Med? What Really Happened With Dean Archer
Technical Details You Probably Missed
The video wasn't all CGI and green screens. That was a real 600-pound wrecking ball.
- The Lighting: Richardson used harsh, direct lighting to emphasize the texture of the concrete and the skin.
- The Wardrobe: Or lack thereof. She starts in a white crop top and high-waisted briefs (very 2013 American Apparel aesthetic) before the "nude" scenes.
- The Boots: Those burgundy Dr. Martens she wears while swinging? They became a massive fashion trend immediately after the video’s release.
How the Video Changed the Pop Landscape
Before this video, Miley was still "transitioning." Can't Be Tamed had happened, but it felt like a costume. The Miley Cyrus I came in like a wrecking ball video was the moment the transition ended. She wasn't a Disney star anymore. She was a disruptor.
It paved the way for artists like Billie Eilish, Halsey, and Olivia Rodrigo to lean into "ugly" emotions. It proved that a female pop star could be messy and "too much" and still have the #1 song in the country. It broke the mold of the "perfect" pop princess.
The song itself, produced by Dr. Luke and Cirkut, is a masterclass in dynamics. The verses are quiet, almost whispered. Then the chorus hits like... well, a wrecking ball. The video matches that sonic energy perfectly.
Common Misconceptions
People often think the video was just about being "edgy."
Actually, the song was originally written with Beyoncé in mind, according to some of the songwriters. Can you imagine a Beyoncé version of this video? It would have been completely different—likely more polished and regal. Miley took a song that could have been a standard power ballad and turned it into a cultural flashpoint through sheer audacity.
Another misconception is that the crying was fake. Crew members from the set have noted that Miley was actually in a very dark place during the shoot, coming off her high-profile breakup with Liam Hemsworth. That wasn't acting; that was a 20-year-old processing a broken engagement in front of a camera lens.
💡 You might also like: Is Heroes and Villains Legit? What You Need to Know Before Buying
Actionable Takeaways for Content Creators and Artists
What can we actually learn from this decade-old video today?
1. Visual Identity is Everything
A great song is half the battle. A great visual makes it immortal. If you're releasing a project, find one "sticky" image that people can't forget.
2. Don't Fear the "Ugly" Shot
In the age of Instagram filters and AI-perfected faces, the Miley Cyrus I came in like a wrecking ball video reminds us that raw emotion—red eyes, snot, and all—connects deeper than perfection.
3. Lean Into the Contrast
The reason the video worked was the contrast between the delicate, emotional close-ups and the heavy, industrial imagery of the wrecking ball. Find the "heavy" and "light" in your own work and put them next to each other.
4. Own Your Narrative
Miley took the hits for this video. She was mocked on SNL, parodied by everyone from Hulk Hogan to your local high school teacher, and she leaned into it. She didn't apologize.
If you want to revisit the impact, go back and watch the video on a high-quality screen. Ignore the noise of the 2013 tabloids. Just look at the performance. It remains one of the most daring moments in 21st-century pop culture, a bridge between the old world of music videos and the new world of viral, visual storytelling.
To truly understand the legacy, look at Miley's 2023 hit "Flowers." You can see the growth—from swinging on a ball to walking yourself home. One couldn't exist without the other.
The next time you see a celebrity doing something "crazy" for a video, remember Miley. She didn't just swing on a ball; she knocked down the door for everyone who came after her.
Next Steps for the Super-Fan:
Check out the "Wrecking Ball" (Director's Cut) on Vevo. It consists entirely of the close-up shot of Miley's face. It’s a haunting, four-minute study in facial acting that proves the emotional weight of the song was never about the nudity. Once you see the raw focus of that cut, the "controversial" version feels entirely different. You'll see the exhaustion in her eyes that the fast editing of the original version sometimes hides. It's a sobering look at a young artist at the height of her powers and the peak of her personal turmoil.