Nobody actually expected Joan Crawford to win. Not even Joan. On the night of the 1946 Academy Awards, she stayed home, tucked under the covers in her Brentwood mansion, claiming a "bout of influenza." Critics at the time whispered it was actually a case of nerves. She was terrified of losing. But then, the unthinkable happened. She won.
The Mildred Pierce Joan Crawford film didn't just give her a trophy; it literally resurrected a career that the industry had declared dead and buried. Crawford had been labeled "box office poison" only a few years earlier. MGM had paid her to leave. When she signed with Warner Bros., she was so desperate for the role of Mildred that she did something a star of her stature never did: she agreed to a screen test.
What most people get wrong about the Mildred Pierce Joan Crawford film
If you’ve only seen the movie, you might think you know the story. You probably don't. The film is actually a massive departure from the James M. Cain novel. In the book, there is no murder. Nobody gets shot. It’s a gritty, Depression-era "weeper" about a woman who makes pies to survive.
Hollywood, however, loved a good body count in 1945. To make the movie more marketable, the studio turned it into a film noir. They added the iconic opening—a man being shot in a dark beach house—and framed the whole thing as a police interrogation.
📖 Related: Why American Beauty by the Grateful Dead is Still the Gold Standard of Americana
- The Murder: Monte Beragon (Zachary Scott) is killed in the movie. In the book, he just stays a pathetic, fading socialite.
- The Veda Factor: Ann Blyth’s Veda is a monster. In the novel, she’s an opera singer. In the film, she’s a nightclub siren who’d kill to get what she wants.
- The Tone: The movie is high-glamour noir. The book is a sweaty, desperate look at the middle class.
The director who hated Joan (at first)
Michael Curtiz was a tyrant. He had just come off Casablanca and had zero patience for "star" antics. When Jerry Wald suggested Crawford for Mildred, Curtiz was livid. He famously referred to her as a "has-been." He didn't want the "manicured" MGM version of Crawford; he wanted a woman who looked like she actually worked in a kitchen.
During the first few weeks of filming the Mildred Pierce Joan Crawford film, the tension was thick enough to cut with a steak knife. Curtiz reportedly screamed at her for wearing shoulder pads. He thought they made her look too tough, too "Joan Crawford." He even tried to rip the padding out of her dress, only to find out it was her actual bone structure and a very specific bra.
Eventually, they found a middle ground. Crawford agreed to wear simple house dresses and do her own "waitressing" stunts. She spent days practicing how to carry a tray correctly. That dedication is why the performance feels so grounded. You can see the exhaustion in her eyes when she’s taking orders at the diner. It wasn't just acting; it was a woman fighting for her professional life.
👉 See also: Why October London Make Me Wanna Is the Soul Revival We Actually Needed
Why Veda Pierce is the ultimate movie villain
We have to talk about Ann Blyth. She was only 16 when she played Veda, but she managed to be one of the most hated characters in cinematic history. Veda represents the dark side of the American Dream. Mildred wants to give her daughter everything she never had, and Veda loathes her for the very work that pays for those luxuries.
"I'm not gonna have a baby!"
That line, delivered with such coldness, was a shocker for 1945 audiences. The relationship between Mildred and Veda is toxic, codependent, and deeply uncomfortable. It’s the "femme fatale" trope turned inside out—the danger isn't a mysterious woman in a trench coat; it’s the child you raised.
✨ Don't miss: How to Watch The Wolf and the Lion Without Getting Lost in the Wild
Behind the scenes of that Oscar night
So, back to the "flu." When Joan’s name was called, she wasn't at the theater. Michael Curtiz accepted it for her. Within minutes, a horde of reporters and photographers were racing to her house.
Honestly, it was one of the best PR moves in history. Crawford "recovered" instantly. She did her hair, put on a glamorous bed jacket, and posed with the Oscar in bed. Those photos went everywhere. It cemented the narrative: the queen had returned.
The legacy of a noir masterpiece
The Mildred Pierce Joan Crawford film works because it’s messy. It’s a movie about class, about the "stink of grease," and about how love can be a form of self-destruction. It broke the rules of the 1940s "woman's picture" by adding shadows and bullets.
If you're looking to dive deeper into this classic, start by watching the 1945 original and then compare it to the 2011 HBO miniseries starring Kate Winslet. The HBO version is much closer to the book—no murder, more pies—and seeing the two side-by-side reveals how much the "noir" elements changed the story's soul.
Actionable Next Steps:
- Watch the 1945 Film: Pay close attention to the lighting by Ernest Haller. The way the shadows grow as Mildred’s life falls apart is a masterclass in visual storytelling.
- Read the James M. Cain Novel: It's a quick, brutal read. You’ll be surprised at how much more "adult" and cynical the original story is compared to the Hays Code-compliant movie.
- Check out the Screen Test: If you can find the footage of Crawford's screen test for Curtiz, watch it. It's a rare glimpse of a mega-star stripping away the ego to prove she still has the "stuff."