Why The Lion King Still Hits Harder Than Any Other Disney Movie

Why The Lion King Still Hits Harder Than Any Other Disney Movie

The year was 1994. Disney was in the middle of a massive winning streak, but everyone at the studio actually thought Pocahontas was going to be the big "prestige" hit while The Lion King was just a side project. They were wrong. Really wrong. Decades later, we are still humming "Circle of Life" and feeling that weird, specific gut-punch when Mufasa falls into the gorge. It isn't just nostalgia talking, though that definitely plays a part for those of us who grew up with the VHS tape. There is something fundamentally different about how this story was put together.

It's Shakespeare in the savannah. Basically, they took Hamlet, mixed in some biblical themes like Joseph and Moses, and set it against a backdrop of incredibly high-stakes wildlife politics. It shouldn't have worked as well as it did, yet it became the highest-grossing traditional animation film of all time.

The Lion King and the "B-Team" Legend

There is this famous story in animation circles about how the "A-team" animators at Disney didn't want to touch The Lion King. They thought a movie about lions with no human characters was a risky bet. Honestly, that lack of corporate pressure probably saved the film. It allowed the creators to take risks, like that opening sequence. Think about it—four minutes of music with zero dialogue. In a kids' movie! That was a massive gamble back then.

Jeffrey Katzenberg, who was running Disney's film division at the time, reportedly told the crew that if the movie made $50 million, he’d be happy. It ended up making nearly a billion. The success came from the ground up, fueled by a group of artists who felt they had something to prove because they were the "underdogs" compared to the team working on Pocahontas.

📖 Related: Why Grand Funk’s Bad Time is Secretly the Best Pop Song of the 1970s

Hans Zimmer and the Sound of Africa

You can't talk about the legacy of the film without mentioning the music. While Elton John and Tim Rice get the credit for the catchy radio hits, Hans Zimmer is the one who gave the movie its soul. Before this, Zimmer was known for moody synth scores. For The Lion King, he brought in Lebo M., a South African composer, to provide the authentic choral arrangements.

That opening chant? Nants ingonyama bagithi Baba. It’s Zulu. It means "Here comes a lion, Father." It wasn't just fluff; it was an intentional choice to ground the movie in the actual geography and culture of East Africa. Zimmer has since said in interviews that he treated the score like a requiem for his own father, which explains why the music feels so much heavier and more emotional than your average cartoon soundtrack.

What Most People Get Wrong About the Plot

People love to point out the similarities between The Lion King and a Japanese series called Kimba the White Lion. It’s a huge point of contention online. You’ve probably seen the side-by-side shots. While the visual echoes are definitely there—Simba and Kimba, the cliffside scenes—Disney has always maintained that the similarities were coincidental or just a result of both being based on "lion tropes."

👉 See also: Why La Mera Mera Radio is Actually Dominating Local Airwaves Right Now

The real DNA of the movie, however, is much more European. It follows the "Hero's Journey" to a T. Simba isn't just a runaway; he’s a character dealing with PTSD and survivor's guilt. We don't usually see that in G-rated movies. When Rafiki hits Simba over the head with his stick, it’s a masterclass in philosophical storytelling. "The past can hurt. But the way I see it, you can either run from it, or learn from it." That isn't just a line for kids. It’s a genuine psychological insight.

The Scar Problem

Scar is arguably Disney’s best villain because he isn’t just "evil." He’s resentful. He’s the overlooked brother. Jeremy Irons brought a Shakespearean gravitas to the role that made Scar feel genuinely dangerous. He wasn't trying to blow up the world; he just wanted the chair. His motivation was purely political, which makes the stakes feel incredibly grounded despite the talking animals.

The 2019 Remake and the "Uncanny Valley"

Then we have to address the 2019 "live-action" (though it was actually 100% digital) remake. It made a ton of money—over $1.6 billion—but it sparked a massive debate about the soul of animation.

✨ Don't miss: Why Love Island Season 7 Episode 23 Still Feels Like a Fever Dream

  • Photorealism vs. Expression: In the original, Simba’s eyebrows tell you everything. In the remake, a "real" lion doesn't have eyebrows that move like that.
  • The Mufasa Scene: The 2019 version struggled to convey the horror of the stampede because the animals looked too real to show human-like grief.
  • The Visual Language: The 1994 version used colors—purples, reds, neon greens—to signal mood. The remake stayed in the realm of National Geographic browns and greys.

Technically, the 2019 film was a miracle of software engineering. But it proved that sometimes, being "too real" actually hurts the storytelling. Animation is about exaggeration, and when you take that away, you lose the "Hakuna Matata" magic.

Why We Still Care

The Lion King works because it deals with the one thing we all eventually have to face: growing up and taking responsibility for things we didn't choose. Simba wanted to be king when it was all "ordered by a king's decree" and singing about being free. He didn't want to be king when it meant fixing a broken ecosystem and facing his own trauma.

That transition from "I Just Can't Wait to Be King" to the final walk up Pride Rock is one of the most satisfying character arcs in cinema. It’s about the "Circle of Life" in a literal sense—the idea that our lives are part of a larger, interconnected web. It’s a heavy concept for a movie that also features a flatulent warthog, but that's why it works. It balances the high-brow philosophy with the low-brow humor.

Actionable Takeaways for Superfans

If you want to experience the story beyond the standard 88-minute movie, there are a few specific things you should look into that most casual viewers miss:

  1. Watch the "The Morning Report" segment: This was a song added for the IMAX re-release and the Platinum Edition DVD. It's divisive, but it adds a little more flavor to Zazu and Mufasa's relationship.
  2. Listen to "The Rhythm of the Pridelands": This is a 1995 concept album that expanded on the movie's music. It’s where songs like "He Lives in You" (later used in the sequel and the Broadway show) originated.
  3. See the Broadway Play: Seriously. Even if you aren't a "theater person," Julie Taymor’s use of puppetry and African masks is a total reimagining. It doesn't try to copy the movie; it interprets it through a different artistic lens.
  4. Check out the Original Concept Art: Look for the work of Chris Sanders (who later did Lilo & Stitch). His early sketches of the Pridelands were much more rugged and moody than the final product.

The Lion King isn't just a movie anymore; it’s a cultural touchstone. Whether you prefer the hand-drawn lines of the 90s or the digital fur of the 2020s, the core of the story—finding your place in the world—is never going out of style. It’s one of the few films that truly deserves the title of a modern myth.