Why the Ishihara Test Still Rules Colour Vision Screening (And Its Quirky Limits)

Why the Ishihara Test Still Rules Colour Vision Screening (And Its Quirky Limits)

Ever sat in an optometrist’s chair and felt that weird, creeping anxiety while staring at a circle of dots? You know the one. It looks like a Jackson Pollock painting had a baby with a bowl of Fruity Pebbles. That's the Ishihara test. It's basically the gold standard for spotting red-green colour blindness, and honestly, it hasn't changed much since Dr. Shinobu Ishihara first published it back in 1917.

Most people think they’ll just "see the number" or they won't. But it’s actually way more nuanced than a simple pass-fail grade. If you’ve ever wondered why you can see a "7" while your friend swears it’s a "21," or why digital versions of these plates are often total garbage, you’re in the right place.

What is the Ishihara Test, Really?

At its core, the test uses something called pseudoisochromatic plates. That’s just a fancy way of saying "dots that look like they have the same colour but actually don't." When Dr. Ishihara, a professor at the University of Tokyo, developed these, he was specifically looking for a way to screen recruits for the Imperial Japanese Army. He needed a fast, portable, and foolproof method to make sure soldiers could distinguish signals and maps.

The magic is in the "confusion colours."

Humans with standard trichromatic vision have three types of cones in their retinas: red, green, and blue. If your red cones (protan) or green cones (deutan) are acting up, certain shades of brown, olive, and orange start looking identical. The Ishihara test exploits these overlaps. By carefully selecting the brightness (luminance) of the dots, the test ensures you can't just cheat by looking for light or dark spots. You have to actually see the hue.

✨ Don't miss: Ankle Stretches for Runners: What Most People Get Wrong About Mobility

There are different types of plates in a standard 38-plate book. Some are "transformation" plates, where a person with normal vision sees one number, but someone with a deficiency sees another. Then you have "vanishing" plates where the number disappears entirely if your cones aren't firing right. There are even "hidden digit" plates that only people with colour blindness can see. It’s kinda brilliant.

Why Your Phone Screen Might Be Lying to You

You’ve probably seen "online colour blind tests" while scrolling through social media. They’re fun, but they are often scientifically useless. Here’s why.

The Ishihara test was designed for specific lighting conditions—specifically natural daylight or "CIE Standard Illuminant C." Computer monitors and smartphone screens use RGB (Red, Green, Blue) pixels that emit light, whereas the physical book reflects light. If your screen has a blue-light filter on, or if you’re using an old LCD with poor colour gamut, the "confusion colours" won't be confusing in the right way. You might fail a digital test while having perfect vision, or worse, pass one when you actually have a deficiency.

Genuine clinical testing requires the physical book. And it’s expensive! A real Kanehara Trading edition of the Ishihara plates can cost a couple hundred bucks because the ink calibration has to be incredibly precise. If the green is just a tiny bit too "yellow," the whole diagnostic value evaporates.

🔗 Read more: Can DayQuil Be Taken At Night: What Happens If You Skip NyQuil

The Limits of the Dots

Despite being the most famous tool in the shed, the Ishihara test has some massive blind spots. First off, it only tests for red-green deficiencies. If you have Tritanopia (blue-yellow colour blindness), the Ishihara book is useless. You’d need something like the HRR (Hardy-Rand-Rittler) test for that.

Also, it doesn't really tell you how bad the deficiency is. It’s a screening tool, not a quantitative one. It can tell the doctor, "Hey, this person has a deutan issue," but it won't necessarily tell you if you can safely work as a commercial pilot or an electrician. For that kind of precision, specialists use the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue Test, which involves arranging 85 different coloured caps in a perfect gradient. It’s tedious. It takes forever. But it gives a much clearer picture of your "colour space."

Life With a Different Palette

If you "fail" an Ishihara test, don't panic. You aren't seeing the world in black and white. Total colour blindness (achromatopsia) is incredibly rare. Most people with a "fail" result just see certain shades of mud-green and brick-red as the same tan colour.

It’s mostly a genetic thing, carried on the X chromosome. This is why about 8% of men have some form of colour deficiency, while only about 0.5% of women do. Sorry, guys. It's just the way the DNA rolls.

💡 You might also like: Nuts Are Keto Friendly (Usually), But These 3 Mistakes Will Kick You Out Of Ketosis

Interestingly, there’s some evidence that being "colour blind" might have offered an evolutionary advantage. Some studies suggest that people with red-green deficiencies are better at spotting camouflaged objects in nature because they aren't distracted by the "noise" of various red and green hues. They focus more on texture and luminance. So, if you can't see the "12" in the dots, maybe you're just a better hunter-gatherer.

Practical Steps If You're Concerned

If you suspect your colour vision isn't quite right, or if you're hitting obstacles in your career—like graphic design, electronics, or aviation—here is how to handle it properly.

  • See a Pro: Skip the YouTube videos. Go to an optometrist who has the actual physical Ishihara test book. Ask them to perform the test under "D65" lighting or natural North sky light.
  • Request the HRR Test: If you're struggling with blues and yellows, specifically ask for the Hardy-Rand-Rittler plates. Many standard offices don't pull these out unless you ask.
  • Context Matters: Understand that "colour blind" is a bit of a misnomer. Most people have "colour deficiency." You might struggle with the test plates but still be perfectly fine driving because you’ve learned that the "red" light is always on top and has a distinct brightness.
  • Check the EnChroma Option: There are glasses now that use notch filters to help separate overlapping light wavelengths. They don't "cure" colour blindness, and they don't work for everyone, but for some, they make the Ishihara test plates pop in a way they’ve never seen before.
  • Workplace Accommodations: If you're a coder or a designer, many modern software suites (like Adobe or various IDEs) have "Protanopia" and "Deuteranopia" filters. Use them. They change the UI to high-contrast palettes that don't rely on red-green distinctions.

The Ishihara test remains a masterpiece of psychological and physiological engineering. It’s a century-old solution to a complex biological problem, and while it isn't perfect, it’s still the first line of defense in understanding how we each perceive the vibrant world around us.