August 1, 2007. It was a Wednesday. Rush hour in Minneapolis was exactly what you’d expect—a slow, hot crawl of commuters trying to get home, baseball fans heading toward the Metrodome for a Twins game, and a school bus carrying 52 kids. Then, at 6:05 p.m., the unthinkable happened. The I-35W bridge collapse wasn’t a slow crumble. It was a terrifying, 13-second structural scream that dropped 1,000 feet of deck and 111 vehicles into the Mississippi River.
Thirteen people died. 145 were injured.
Honestly, looking back at the footage today, it’s a miracle the death toll wasn't in the hundreds. But the real story isn't just the horror of that evening; it's the "why" that came after. It’s about how a tiny piece of steel, thinner than it should have been, sat there for forty years like a ticking time bomb until the weight finally became too much.
The Gusset Plate: A Half-Inch Mistake
When we think of bridge failures, we usually think of rust. We think of salt eating away at the rebar or maybe a barge hitting a pier. But the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation into the I-35W bridge collapse found something much more systemic and, frankly, frustrating.
The culprit? Gusset plates. Specifically, those thick steel sheets that bolt the girders together. In the case of the I-35W bridge—officially Bridge 9340—the plates at certain joints were only half an inch thick. They should have been an inch.
Basically, it was a design error from the 1960s. The firm Sverdrup & Parcel made a math mistake that nobody caught for four decades. For years, the bridge held up just fine. But then, as the decades rolled on, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) added more weight. They added two inches of concrete to the deck in 1977. They added another two inches in 1998. Each time, those undersized gusset plates were pushed closer to their breaking point.
The Last Straw
On the day of the collapse, there was a lot going on. Maintenance crews were working on the bridge. They had 575,000 pounds of construction equipment and materials—sand, gravel, water tankers—parked directly over the weakest joints of the bridge.
Combine that massive stationary load with the stop-and-go traffic of rush hour, and the math finally stopped working. One of the plates, known as U10, buckled. Once that one went, the rest of the bridge followed in a catastrophic chain reaction. It was a "fracture-critical" design, meaning there was no redundancy. If one major part failed, the whole thing was going down.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Inspection History
You’ll often hear people say, "The bridge was rated 'structurally deficient,' so why was it open?"
It’s a fair question, but it’s more complicated than that. In 2007, about 70,000 bridges across the U.S. were rated structurally deficient. It doesn’t mean a bridge is about to fall down; it means it needs significant maintenance or doesn't meet modern standards. MnDOT knew the bridge had issues. They saw cracks. They even had a report from the University of Minnesota suggesting the gusset plates might be overstressed.
But they chose to manage the risk rather than replace the bridge immediately. They were planning to replace it eventually, but the timeline was years out. This highlights a massive tension in American infrastructure: do you fix the "poor" bridge that's still standing, or do you build a new one before it's too late?
Gary Peterson, a former bridge inspector, once noted that inspectors are trained to look for corrosion and fatigue cracks. They aren't necessarily looking for design errors. They assume the original engineers got the math right. That assumption died with the I-35W bridge collapse.
The Legacy of the New St. Anthony Falls Bridge
The replacement bridge, which opened just over a year later, is a marvel of modern technology. It’s called the St. Anthony Falls Bridge, and it’s basically the opposite of its predecessor.
- It uses high-performance concrete designed to last 100 years.
- It is packed with more than 300 sensors that monitor strain, temperature, and corrosion in real-time.
- The design is redundant—if one part fails, the weight is distributed elsewhere.
But the collapse changed more than just one bridge in Minneapolis. It changed how every state in the country looks at its "gusset plates." The NTSB issued a series of recommendations that forced engineers to go back and check the math on thousands of bridges built in the 60s and 70s. We found out that Bridge 9340 wasn't the only one with thin plates.
Why We Should Still Care in 2026
You might think a nearly twenty-year-old disaster is old news. It isn't. The I-35W bridge collapse remains the primary case study for why "deferred maintenance" is a dangerous game. According to recent infrastructure report cards, while the number of structurally deficient bridges has decreased since 2007, the pace of repair is still glacially slow.
We are currently seeing a massive influx of federal funding through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, but the backlog is trillions of dollars deep. The I-35W story serves as a reminder that "stable" is a relative term.
📖 Related: Land O' Lakes Florida Sinkhole: Why This Giant Hole Changed Everything for Homeowners
A Culture of Safety
The collapse also triggered a shift in legal liability. The survivors and the families of the victims eventually reached a $60.7 million settlement with the state and various contractors. But the real cost was the loss of public trust. People started looking at the bridges they crossed every day with a new sense of anxiety.
Was that crack normal? Is that vibrating too much?
Honestly, it’s good that we’re asking. Public pressure is often the only thing that moves the needle on infrastructure spending. We tend to ignore the pipes, the wires, and the beams until they stop working. In the case of I-35W, "stop working" meant a plunge into the river.
Actionable Lessons for the Future
We can't change the past, but we can change how we interact with our built environment. If you're someone who cares about community safety or works in urban planning, there are specific things to watch for.
1. Demand Transparency in Bridge Ratings
Every bridge in the U.S. has a National Bridge Inventory (NBI) rating. These are public records. You can—and should—look up the bridges in your daily commute. If a bridge is rated "poor" or "structurally deficient," ask your local representatives what the timeline is for repair. Don't wait for a disaster to make it a campaign issue.
2. Support Technology Integration
The sensors on the new I-35W bridge shouldn't be a luxury. Smart infrastructure is the only way we can monitor the thousands of bridges that aren't getting human eyes on them every day. Supporting tax initiatives that prioritize "smart" repairs over just "more lanes" is a vital shift in thinking.
👉 See also: Election Results by County 2020: What Most People Get Wrong
3. Understand the "Redundancy" Factor
When new bridges are proposed, look for "redundant" designs. Truss bridges like the old I-35W are beautiful, but many of them lack the fail-safes we now consider mandatory. A bridge should be able to lose a member and stay standing.
4. Respect the Load Limits
It sounds boring, but those weight limit signs on older bridges are there for a reason. As we saw in 2007, even "temporary" loads like construction equipment can be the tipping point for an overstressed structure.
The I-35W bridge collapse wasn't an "act of God." It was a failure of math and a failure of oversight. By remembering the victims and the specific engineering failures that led to that day, we can ensure that the "scare" of 2007 continues to drive better, safer engineering for the next century. Our infrastructure is only as strong as its weakest plate.