Arthur Conan Doyle actually tried to kill him off. Most people forget that. By the time the world got The Hound of the Baskervilles, Sherlock Holmes was technically supposed to be dead, at the bottom of the Reichenbach Falls. But the public went ballistic. They wore black armbands. They flooded the magazines with hate mail. So, Doyle gave in, sort of. He didn't bring Holmes back to life immediately; instead, he wrote a "reminiscence." A prequel.
It changed everything.
The book isn't just a detective story. It's basically a horror movie printed on paper. You’ve got this ancient family curse, a massive glowing dog that eats people, and a landscape—the Dartmoor mires—that literally swallows ponies whole. It’s bleak. It’s lonely. Honestly, it’s the one time Holmes feels like he might actually be out of his depth because you can’t exactly use a magnifying glass to stop a demonic hell-hound.
The Real History Behind the Hell-Hound
Doyle didn't just pull a giant ghost dog out of thin air. He was staying at the Duchy Hotel in Princetown when he started piecing it together. He’d been talking to a friend named Bertram Fletcher Robinson. Robinson told him about the legend of Richard Cabell, a local squire from the 1600s with a reputation so nasty that when he died, the locals built a giant stone box over his grave to keep him from wandering. Legend says a pack of fire-breathing hounds roamed the moor on the anniversary of his death.
Doyle took that local folklore and ran with it.
He didn't just want a mystery; he wanted atmosphere. The moor is a character. If you’ve ever actually been to Dartmoor, you know it’s weirdly silent. One minute it’s sunny, and the next, a fog rolls in that’s so thick you can’t see your own boots. Doyle uses this to strip Holmes of his greatest weapon: his sight.
Why Watson is the Secret Hero Here
For a huge chunk of the book, Sherlock Holmes isn't even there.
📖 Related: Alfonso Cuarón: Why the Harry Potter 3 Director Changed the Wizarding World Forever
That’s a bold move for a series named after him. He sends Watson down to Devon to protect Sir Henry Baskerville, the last heir to the fortune. We get to see Watson actually doing the work. He’s writing reports. He’s investigating. He’s dealing with the creepy neighbors, like the Stapletons and the Barrymores.
Watson gets a bad rap in the old movies as a bumbling sidekick. In the book? He's a war vet with a service revolver who isn't afraid to use it. He’s observant, even if he doesn't have that freakish "detective brain" Holmes has. Seeing the moor through Watson's eyes makes the stakes feel higher because he's just as vulnerable as we are.
The Science of the Supernatural
The central conflict of The Hound of the Baskervilles is basically Reason vs. Superstition. Dr. Mortimer, the guy who brings the case to Baker Street, is a man of science, yet he’s the one convinced the hound is supernatural. He’s the one who found the footprints.
"Mr. Holmes, they were the footprints of a gigantic hound!"
That line is iconic. But Holmes doesn't buy it. He can’t. If the dog is a ghost, Holmes is out of a job. You can't cross-examine a phantom.
The "magic" trick behind the hound is actually pretty grounded in reality, though it’s messed up. Stapleton, the villain, uses phosphorus. He paints the dog to make it glow in the dark. It’s a psychological tactic. He’s not just trying to kill his victims; he’s trying to scare them to death. It worked on Sir Charles Baskerville. The poor guy had a heart condition, saw a glowing monster in the fog, and his ticker just gave out.
👉 See also: Why the Cast of Hold Your Breath 2024 Makes This Dust Bowl Horror Actually Work
Breaking Down the Gothic Horror Elements
Doyle was a master of the "Gothic." You can see it in every chapter.
- The Setting: Baskerville Hall is a crumbling mess of shadows and old portraits.
- The Weather: Rain, wind, and that "Great Grimpen Mire" that acts like a natural trap.
- The Isolation: The nearest neighbors are miles away, and one of them is an escaped convict hiding in the rocks.
It’s a perfect storm. It takes the "gentleman detective" out of the cozy, gas-lit streets of London and drops him into a prehistoric wasteland where the old rules don't apply.
The Stapleton Twist
Jack Stapleton is one of the better villains in the Holmes canon because he’s a mirror of Holmes himself. He’s smart. He’s patient. He’s a naturalist who collects butterflies, which is a nice touch because it shows he has the stomach to pin living things to a board just to look at them. He’s actually a Baskerville himself—a long-lost cousin looking to inherit the estate.
His plan was almost perfect. If he hadn't been so cruel to his wife (who he was pretending was his sister—talk about a red flag), he might have gotten away with it.
Why the Ending Still Hits
The climax in the fog is genuine suspense. Holmes, Watson, and Lestrange are waiting outside Merripit House. The fog is moving in. If it covers the path, they can't see the dog coming. They’re basically blind.
When the hound finally appears, Doyle describes it as a "gaunt, savage, and scar-colored" beast with eyes of fire. It’s a brutal scene. They have to empty their guns into it. It’s not a tidy deduction in a drawing room; it’s a desperate fight for survival in the mud.
✨ Don't miss: Is Steven Weber Leaving Chicago Med? What Really Happened With Dean Archer
And then there's the fate of Stapleton. He doesn't get a trial. He doesn't get a dramatic speech. He just gets lost in the Mire. He steps off the path in the dark and the mud pulls him under. There's something deeply satisfying about that. The moor claimed him.
Actionable Takeaways for Modern Readers
If you're looking to dive into the world of Sherlock Holmes, or if you’ve only ever seen the Benedict Cumberbatch version, here is how to actually approach the source material for the best experience.
Read it at night. This sounds cliché, but the atmosphere is 90% of the appeal. If you’re reading this on a sunny beach, the tension of the Grimpen Mire isn't going to hit the same way.
Look for the 1939 film. While there are dozens of versions, the Basil Rathbone version from 1939 is widely considered the gold standard for a reason. It captures the fog and the "vibe" better than almost any high-budget modern remake.
Pay attention to the red herrings. Doyle is a jerk with his clues. He makes you think the escaped convict, Selden, is the main threat. He makes you suspicious of the butler, Barrymore, because he’s signaling someone with a candle at night. Ignore the flashy stuff. Focus on the people who seem the most "normal."
Visit the real locations. If you’re ever in the UK, go to Postbridge or Princetown in Devon. You can still see the stone hut circles that Doyle describes. Just don't go off the marked paths. The bogs are actually real, and they really will ruin your day.
Compare it to 'A Study in Scarlet'. If you want to see how much Doyle’s writing evolved, read his first book and then this one. The difference in pacing and character depth is massive. In The Hound of the Baskervilles, Holmes is less of a machine and more of a man who understands that some things are truly terrifying.
The book remains a masterpiece because it taps into a primal fear. We like to think we're smart and civilized, but put us on a dark moor with something howling in the distance, and all that logic goes right out the window. That's why we’re still talking about it over a century later.