Why The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies Still Divides Fans a Decade Later

Why The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies Still Divides Fans a Decade Later

Peter Jackson was tired. You can see it in the behind-the-scenes footage—the way he holds his head in his hands while trying to figure out a battle sequence that hadn't even been fully scripted yet. By the time The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies hit theaters in 2014, the "Middle-earth" fatigue wasn't just hitting the crew; it was hitting the audience too. This wasn't the slow, melodic journey of The Fellowship of the Ring. It was a loud, CGI-heavy, 144-minute explosion that tried to turn a few dozen pages of a children's book into a gritty war epic. Honestly, it’s a miracle it works as well as it does, considering the chaotic production history that plagued the finale of this second trilogy.

People love to hate on the high frame rate or the "gold swimming" scene with Smaug, but there’s a lot more going on under the hood of this movie than just bad VFX.

The Messy Reality of How The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies Was Made

If you want to understand why the movie feels the way it does, you have to look at the timeline. Guillermo del Toro spent years designing a very different version of this world before he walked away. When Peter Jackson stepped back into the director’s chair, he didn't have the years of pre-production he enjoyed on The Lord of the Rings. He was basically building the plane while flying it. For the final installment, The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies, this meant that many of the complex tactical movements of the various armies were being designed on the fly.

The title itself changed late in the game. For a long time, it was supposed to be There and Back Again. But Jackson realized that since Smaug dies in the first twenty minutes of this film, the "Back Again" part felt a bit dishonest. The story had become about the war, not the journey home.

Think about the pressure. You’re following up one of the greatest cinematic achievements in history. You’ve got a studio breathing down your neck to make three movies instead of two because, let’s be real, the box office numbers for Middle-earth are basically a license to print money. This third film is the result of that stretching. It takes the "Dragon Sickness" of Thorin Oakenshield and tries to turn it into a psychological thriller, while also trying to manage a love triangle between a dwarf, an elf, and Legolas—who wasn't even in the original book.

It’s messy. It’s loud. But it’s also weirdly ambitious in its attempt to bridge the gap to The Fellowship of the Ring.

What Most People Get Wrong About the Battle Itself

There’s this common complaint that the battle makes no sense. Why are the eagles always the "get out of jail free" card? Why do the Elves jump over the Dwarven shield wall?

💡 You might also like: Dark Reign Fantastic Four: Why This Weirdly Political Comic Still Holds Up

Actually, if you look at the tactical layout Jackson attempted, there’s a logic buried in the chaos. The five armies are generally defined as the Elves of Mirkwood, the Dwarves of the Iron Hills, the Men of Lake-town, the Orcs/Goblins of Dol Guldur and Mount Gundabad, and then—depending on who you ask—the Eagles or the Wargs. In the movie, Jackson leans heavily into the idea of a pincer movement by the Orcs, led by Azog the Defiler.

Azog is a controversial figure because he’s a CGI creation in a world where we all remember the terrifying prosthetic makeup of Lurtz from the first trilogy. But Azog serves a narrative purpose: he gives Thorin a mirror image. They are both obsessed with vengeance and legacy. The final fight on the ice at Ravenhill is, arguably, the strongest part of the film. It strips away the thousands of digital soldiers and focuses on two characters who just hate each other.

The physics are questionable. We’ve all seen Legolas jumping on falling stones. It’s silly. But in the context of Jackson’s "splatstick" horror roots, it kind of fits his style. He’s always been a director who pushes the physical reality of a scene until it snaps.

The Tragedy of Thorin Oakenshield

Richard Armitage carries this movie. Without his performance as Thorin, The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies would probably fall apart. The way he portrays the "gold sickness" is almost like an addiction story. The floor of Erebor literally turns into a golden abyss in his mind.

Some fans found the "hallucination" scenes a bit cheesy. Maybe they were. But they highlighted the central theme of Tolkien’s work: the corrosive nature of greed. Thorin isn't a villain, but he’s also not a hero for a good chunk of the movie. He’s a guy who won his kingdom and lost his soul. When he finally breaks out of his stupor and leads the charge out of the gates, it’s one of the few moments that captures the high-fantasy magic of the original trilogy.

It's a stark contrast to Bilbo. Martin Freeman’s Bilbo Baggins is the heart of the story, even though he gets pushed to the sidelines in his own movie to make room for the war. His final conversation with Thorin is a genuine tear-jerker. "If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world." That line is straight from the book, and it’s the anchor that keeps the movie from drifting away into pure spectacle.

📖 Related: Cuatro estaciones en la Habana: Why this Noir Masterpiece is Still the Best Way to See Cuba

The CGI Problem and the "Uncanny Valley" of Middle-earth

We have to talk about the visuals. By 2014, the industry had shifted almost entirely to digital sets. In The Lord of the Rings, they built massive miniatures (bigatures) and used forced perspective. In The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies, they used green screens. Lots of them.

This creates a weird "floaty" feeling. You can tell the actors aren't quite standing on the terrain. The lighting doesn't always match the skin tones. This is why the movie feels less "real" than a film made thirteen years prior. It’s an irony of modern filmmaking: as the technology got more expensive, the results often felt cheaper.

The orcs are a prime example. The makeup effects in The Two Towers were visceral. You could see the sweat and the grime. In Five Armies, the orcs are digital clones. They don't have the same weight. When thousands of them clash with the Elves, it feels more like a video game cutscene than a historical epic.

Yet, there are moments of staggering beauty. The design of the Iron Hills Dwarves, led by Billy Connolly’s Dain Ironfoot, is fantastic. The goat-riders and the massive ballistae show the creativity of Weta Workshop was still there, even if it was buried under layers of digital compositing.

Sorting Out the Different Versions

If you’ve only seen the theatrical cut, you haven't really seen the movie. The Extended Edition of The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies adds about 20 minutes of footage, and it changes the rating from PG-13 to R.

Why the R rating? Mostly for the chariot race on the ice and some more creative ways Dwarves use their axes. It actually fixes a few plot holes. You get to see the funeral of Thorin, Fili, and Kili. You see the crowning of Dain. These are essential emotional beats that were cut for time in the theater, which is baffling when you consider how much time was spent on Alfrid Lickspittle (the unlikable comic relief character in Lake-town).

👉 See also: Cry Havoc: Why Jack Carr Just Changed the Reece-verse Forever

Seriously, why was there so much Alfrid? He’s easily the most hated part of the trilogy. Every minute spent on his cowardice was a minute taken away from Beorn the skin-changer. Beorn is a legendary character in the books, but in the movie, he literally just drops out of the sky, shifts into a bear, and then the scene ends. It's one of the biggest letdowns for book fans.

Why It Still Matters Today

Despite its flaws, The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies is a massive technical achievement. It represents the end of an era. It was the last time we saw the "Jackson-verse" version of Middle-earth on the big screen before the rights moved into the hands of Amazon for The Rings of Power.

There’s a certain charm to the "maximalism" of it all. It’s a filmmaker going for broke, trying to give everyone a "super-sized" finale. It’s also a cautionary tale about the dangers of over-extending a story. If The Hobbit had stayed as two movies, this battle would have been the second half of the second film, and it probably would have felt much tighter and more impactful.

But for those who grew up with these films, there's a deep nostalgia. Seeing Ian McKellen as Gandalf one last time, or hearing Howard Shore’s sweeping score—it hits a certain spot. Shore’s music for this film is underrated; he weaves in themes from the original trilogy so subtly that you feel the weight of destiny pulling Bilbo toward the events of The Lord of the Rings.

Actionable Insights for Your Next Rewatch

If you’re planning on revisiting the film, or if you skipped it because of the bad reviews, here is how to actually enjoy it:

  • Watch the Extended Edition. Don't bother with the theatrical cut. The extra character beats and the "R-rated" dwarf action make it a much more cohesive experience.
  • Look for the "Fan Edits." There is a massive community of fans who have re-edited the trilogy into a single four-hour movie (like the M4 Hobbit Book Edit). These versions remove the filler, the love triangle, and the Alfrid scenes, leaving a version that feels much closer to Tolkien’s original vision.
  • Pay attention to the background. Even in the digital chaos, the artists at Weta hid incredible details in the armor and weaponry of the various dwarven clans.
  • Focus on Bilbo. If you watch the movie specifically through Bilbo’s eyes—as a small person caught in a world of giants and egos—the emotional stakes feel much more grounded.

The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies isn't a perfect movie. It’s a loud, flawed, beautiful disaster of an epic. It shows exactly what happens when immense talent meets immense pressure and a lack of time. But in the grand scheme of fantasy cinema, it remains a landmark. We don't get movies this big and this weird very often.

The next time you see it, try to ignore the CGI goats for a second and look at the story of a small hobbit who just wants to go home, sitting in the middle of a war he didn't start, mourning a king who lost his way. That’s where the real magic of Tolkien lives.