You know those iconic blue eyes staring out from a yellow billboard? No, not T.J. Eckleburg. I’m talking about the actual face on the front of the book. Honestly, The Great Gatsby cover art is probably more recognizable than the plot of the novel itself to most people. It's that weird, ethereal, slightly haunting image of a woman’s face floating over a carnival-lit New York skyline. People call it "Celestial Eyes."
It’s iconic. It’s everywhere. It’s also a total anomaly in the publishing world. Usually, an author finishes a book, sends it to the publisher, and then some designer tries to slap a semi-relevant image on the front. That’s not what happened here.
The Artist Who Beat Fitzgerald to the Punch
Francis Cugat. That’s the name you need to know. He was a Spanish painter who basically did one big thing in the literary world and then vanished into the Hollywood film industry. He wasn't some titan of the New York art scene. He was just a guy working for Charles Scribner’s Sons who got a commission.
Here’s where it gets weird. Cugat finished the painting before F. Scott Fitzgerald finished the book.
Think about that. Usually, the art reflects the writing. In this case, the writing started reflecting the art. Fitzgerald was struggling with the manuscript in 1924, staying in the French Riviera, losing his mind a little bit. He saw a sketch of Cugat’s work and went crazy for it. He actually wrote to his publisher, Maxwell Perkins, demanding that they save the art for him. He said he had "written it into" the book.
How The Great Gatsby Cover Art Changed the Story
When we talk about the eyes of Doctor T.J. Eckleburg—those "blue and gigantic" retinas that look out over the Valley of Ashes—we are likely looking at the direct influence of Francis Cugat. Fitzgerald saw those sad, floating eyes on the canvas and realized they were the perfect symbol for the God-like judgment hanging over his shallow characters.
The painting features a pair of heavy-lidded eyes looking down. Inside the irises, if you look closely, there are tiny reclining nude figures. It’s a bit risqué for 1925, but it captures that mix of decadence and despair that defines the Jazz Age. Below the eyes, a bright, jagged explosion of carnival lights represents Coney Island or perhaps the glittering parties at West Egg. It’s messy. It’s loud. It’s beautiful.
🔗 Read more: Why Everyone Is Still Obsessing Over Maybelline SuperStay Skin Tint
The green tear. Did you notice it?
One of the eyes has a single, bright green tear rolling down. People debate this constantly. Is it the green light at the end of Daisy’s dock? Is it just a stylistic choice? Regardless, it adds a layer of sorrow to what could have been a very corporate Art Deco design.
A Disastrous Launch for a Masterpiece
You’d think with such incredible art, the book was an instant hit.
Nope.
When The Great Gatsby dropped in April 1925, it kind of flopped. Critics were lukewarm. Sales were mediocre. Fitzgerald died in 1940 thinking he was a failure, with thousands of copies of the second printing—still sporting Cugat’s "Celestial Eyes"—rotting in a warehouse. It wasn't until World War II, when the Council on Books in Wartime distributed "Armed Services Editions" to soldiers, that the book became a sensation.
Ironically, those cheap wartime editions didn't even use the original The Great Gatsby cover art. They were small, paperback, and utilitarian. The Cugat masterpiece almost disappeared into history.
💡 You might also like: Coach Bag Animal Print: Why These Wild Patterns Actually Work as Neutrals
The Resurrection of the "Celestial Eyes"
So, how did it become the "definitive" look?
In 1979, when the copyright was renewed and the book was being cemented as the Great American Novel, Scribner decided to bring back the original 1925 jacket. It was a marketing masterstroke. By then, the Art Deco aesthetic was nostalgic and cool. The cover didn't just look like a book jacket anymore; it looked like a piece of high art.
Now, if you go to any Barnes & Noble or local indie shop, you’ll see dozens of versions. There are minimalist covers with just a gold monogram. There are movie tie-in covers with Leonardo DiCaprio’s face (which, honestly, feels like a crime against the original vibe). But the Cugat version remains the gold standard.
It’s one of the few times a piece of marketing material became inseparable from the soul of the literature.
Why the Design Actually Works (Technically Speaking)
Most covers from the 20s were busy. They had lots of ornate borders and literal illustrations of people standing around in suits. Cugat went abstract.
- Color Palette: The deep Royal Blue creates a sense of night and mystery.
- Contrast: The harsh yellows and oranges of the city lights pop against that blue, mimicking the flashing lights of Gatsby’s parties.
- Composition: By putting the face in the sky, he suggests something mythological. Gatsby isn't just a guy; he’s a symbol. Daisy isn't just a woman; she’s an unattainable deity.
You’ve probably seen the "fixed" versions where people try to make the eyes look more realistic. They look terrible. The "wrongness" of the proportions—the way the nose is just a suggestion and the mouth is a flickering red line—is exactly why it sticks in your brain. It feels like a dream. Or a hangover.
📖 Related: Bed and Breakfast Wedding Venues: Why Smaller Might Actually Be Better
Honestly, the fact that we're still talking about a jacket designed by a guy who mostly worked on movie posters for Douglas Fairbanks is wild. It proves that sometimes, the "vibe" of a book is just as important as the prose.
Don't Buy the "New" Interpretations
If you’re looking to add a copy to your shelf, stick to the original. Many modern publishers try to get "clever" by using flapper silhouettes or art-deco fonts that look like they were pulled from a Canva template. They miss the point. The Great Gatsby cover art by Cugat isn't just a decoration; it's a character in the book.
If you want to see the original painting, it's actually held at the Princeton University Library. It’s a small gouache on paper. Seeing it in person is a trip because you realize how much of the "texture" of the book's world came from a single piece of paper that F. Scott Fitzgerald happened to see at the right moment.
Actionable Steps for Collectors and Fans
If you're obsessed with the history of this cover, here's how to engage with it beyond just staring at a screen:
- Check your edition: Look at the copyright page. If you have a Scribner edition from the 80s or 90s, compare the color saturation to the modern digital reprints. The older ones often have a deeper, more "ink-heavy" blue that feels more authentic to the period.
- Hunt for the "Facsimile" Edition: Several publishers have released high-quality facsimiles of the 1925 first edition. These include the original typos and, most importantly, the original jacket wrap without the modern barcodes or blurbs. It’s the closest you’ll get to holding what Fitzgerald held.
- Visit the Archives: If you're ever in New Jersey, make an appointment or check the public rotation at Princeton’s Firestone Library. They house the Fitzgerald papers. Seeing the correspondence between him and Maxwell Perkins about the "Celestial Eyes" puts the whole "writer's block" era into perspective.
- Avoid the Movie Covers: Just a personal tip. Movie tie-in covers usually tank in resale value and, quite frankly, they date the book to a specific year. The Cugat art is timeless.
The relationship between the author and the artist here was a fluke. A happy accident. Usually, when a writer says "I wrote the cover into the book," they're lying for PR. With Fitzgerald, the evidence is right there in the Valley of Ashes.