Why The God of Small Things a Novel Still Breaks Hearts and Rules Decades Later

Why The God of Small Things a Novel Still Breaks Hearts and Rules Decades Later

Arundhati Roy didn't just write a book; she basically set the literary world on fire in 1997. Honestly, if you haven't read The God of Small Things a novel, you're missing out on one of the most devastatingly beautiful pieces of prose ever put to paper. It’s not just a story about a family in Kerala. It’s a sensory overload. It's a heavy, humid, and heartbreaking exploration of how the "Big Things" like history and law crush the "Small Things" like love and identity.

When it won the Booker Prize, people were shocked. Not because it wasn't good—it was clearly a masterpiece—but because of how it played with the English language. Roy treats words like toys. She capitalizes random nouns. She breaks them apart. She repeats phrases until they sound like a haunting nursery rhyme. It’s brilliant.

The Kerala You Won’t Find in Travel Brochures

Ayemenem is the setting. It's lush. It's green. It smells of "black gram and pepper." But beneath the surface of this idyllic South Indian village, things are rotting. The story follows the "two-egg twins," Estha and Rahel. They’re seven years old for much of the book, seeing the world through that weirdly sharp, innocent lens children have.

But this isn't a happy childhood memoir. Far from it.

The plot revolves around a single, tragic day in 1969 when their cousin Sophie Mol arrives from England and subsequently drowns. That event is the catalyst, but the real poison starts much earlier. It starts with the "Love Laws." These are the unwritten rules that dictate "who should be loved, and how. And how much." In the world of The God of Small Things a novel, if you break those laws, the world breaks you back.

The Tragedy of Ammu and Velutha

Ammu is the twins' mother. She’s divorced, which in 1960s India made her a social pariah in many circles. She’s restless. She has "infinite capacity for joy" but nowhere to put it. Then there’s Velutha. He’s an "Untouchable" or Dalit. He’s also a genius with his hands—he can fix anything.

Their love affair is the heart of the book.

It’s also their death warrant.

When they cross that line, they aren't just defying their family; they are defying centuries of rigid caste hierarchy. The way Roy describes their secret meetings by the river is breathless. You feel the danger. You feel the humidity. You know it’s going to end badly, because the book tells you so on the very first page. It’s a non-linear narrative, which means Roy spoils the ending immediately, yet somehow, you’re still desperate to see how it happens.

Why the Non-Linear Structure Actually Works

Most writers follow a straight line. Roy? She circles the drain.

She starts at the end, moves to the middle, jumps back to the beginning, and then hangs out in the aftermath for a while. It sounds confusing. It’s actually intuitive. That’s how memory works, right? You don't remember your life in a chronological spreadsheet. You remember the smell of a specific flower or the way the light hit a certain window.

By the time you reach the final chapter—which actually depicts the beginning of the affair—you already know everyone is doomed. It makes the beauty of those moments feel heavy. It makes the "Small Things" feel massive.

The Language of Ayemenem

Roy uses a specific kind of "Indianized" English. It isn't the stiff, formal English of the British Raj. It’s fluid.

  • "Locusts Stand I" (a mishearing of Locust Standi).
  • "Die-able" (describing things that can die).
  • "Thimble-drinker."

These quirks make the twins feel real. They make the tragedy feel personal. When Estha stops talking later in life—becoming "The Quietness"—you feel that silence in your own chest. The prose is so thick you can almost taste it.

The Political is Intensely Personal

One of the biggest misconceptions about The God of Small Things a novel is that it’s just a "sad family story."

Nope.

It’s a blistering critique of post-colonial India. Roy takes aim at everything: the hypocrisy of the Communist Party in Kerala, the lingering cruelty of the British Empire, and the suffocating weight of the caste system. Comrade Pillai, a local politician, is a perfect example of this. He talks about revolution and equality, but when it comes down to protecting a Dalit man (Velutha) from a corrupt police force, he chooses his own political survival every single time.

The police aren't just "bad guys" here. They are the "History Men." They are the ones who enforce the status quo with boots and batons. The scene in the abandoned house (the History House) where they find Velutha is genuinely hard to read. It’s brutal. It’s meant to be.


What People Often Get Wrong About Roy's Masterpiece

Some critics at the time—and even some readers today—find the prose "too much." They call it flowery or overwrought. Honestly? That’s usually because they’re looking for a Western structure in a story that refuses to provide one.

The "Small Things" in the title aren't just trivialities. They are the only things that matter when the "Big Things" (religion, politics, social class) fail us. The way a child holds a toy. The way someone breathes. The way the river moves. Roy is arguing that our obsession with the Big Things is what causes all the suffering.

Key Themes to Look For

  1. The Persistence of Caste: Even though the law says caste is gone, the characters live and die by it.
  2. The Betrayal of Family: Baby Kochamma is one of the most loathsome characters in literature. Her jealousy and bitterness fuel the tragedy.
  3. The Loss of Innocence: The twins don't just grow up; they are essentially dismantled by the world around them.
  4. Nature as a Witness: The river Meenachal is practically a character itself. It gives life, and it takes it away.

How to Approach Reading it Today

If you’re picking up The God of Small Things a novel for the first time in 2026, don't try to rush it. It isn't a thriller. It’s a swamp—in a good way. You have to let yourself sink into the atmosphere.

Pay attention to the recurring phrases. When Roy says something like "Anything can happen to anyone. It’s best to be prepared," she isn't just being cynical. She’s setting the stage for the random, chaotic nature of life.

Also, keep a map of the family tree handy if you get confused. The jump between 1969 and 1993 can be jarring if you aren't paying attention to which version of Rahel or Estha you’re hanging out with.

Actionable Insights for Readers and Students

If you're reading this for a book club or a literature course, here is how to actually get the most out of it:

  • Track the "Small Things": Look for objects that reappear. The puffed-up hair of the Orangedrink Lemondrink man. The wristwatch. The spider in the corner. These aren't just set dressing; they are anchors for the characters' trauma.
  • Research the Syrian Christian Community: The family in the book (the Ipes) belongs to this specific community in Kerala. Understanding their unique history—being Indian but having a long-standing Christian tradition—adds a whole layer to why they feel so superior and yet so fragile.
  • Listen to the Audiobook: Arundhati Roy narrates it herself. Hearing her own cadence and where she places the emphasis on those weird, broken-up words totally changes the experience.
  • Notice the Silence: Estha’s choice to stop speaking is one of the most powerful protests in the book. Think about why words fail him when they clearly don't fail the narrator.

The God of Small Things a novel remains a polarizing, essential piece of work. It doesn't offer easy answers or a "happily ever after." It offers a look at the raw, pulsating heart of human connection and the terrifying forces that try to stop it. It’s a reminder that even when the Big Things win, the Small Things were there first. And they’re the only things worth writing about.

To truly appreciate the depth of Roy's work, compare her portrayal of the Meenachal River to its current ecological state in Kerala. The environmental degradation she hinted at in the later chapters of the book has become a stark reality, adding a prophetic layer to her 1997 narrative. Engaging with local Kerala history from the late 60s will also clarify the specific political tensions between the Congress and Communist parties that serve as the book's backdrop.