Why The Forty Rules of Love by Elif Shafak Still Hits Different Today

Why The Forty Rules of Love by Elif Shafak Still Hits Different Today

You’ve probably seen the pastel-colored cover on a hundred "Books to Read Before You Die" lists. Or maybe you saw a snippet of a Rumi poem on Instagram and someone in the comments mentioned Ella Rubinstein. Honestly, it’s one of those rare novels that manages to be both a massive commercial hit and a genuine spiritual manual for people who are tired of the daily grind. The Forty Rules of Love by Elif Shafak isn't just a book about a midlife crisis, though that's how it starts. It's a dual-narrative powerhouse that jumps between a quiet, slightly suffocating life in modern-day Northampton, Massachusetts, and the dusty, vibrant streets of 13th-century Konya.

It’s about a woman named Ella. She’s forty, has three kids, a husband who’s cheating, and a life that looks perfect on paper but feels like a desert. Then she gets a job as a reader for a literary agency. Her first assignment is a manuscript called Sweet Blasphemy by an unknown author named A.Z. Zahara. This is where the magic—or the "blasphemy," depending on who you ask—begins.

The Dual Narrative That Shouldn't Work (But Does)

Shafak pulls off a tricky balancing act here. You’re reading about Ella’s slow-motion awakening in the 2000s, and then suddenly, you’re thrust into the world of Shams of Tabriz and the legendary poet Rumi. It’s a lot. But the connection between the two eras is the search for love. Not the Hallmark card kind. The kind that destroys you so you can be rebuilt.

Shams is the catalyst. In the 13th century, he’s this wandering dervish, a man who is basically a spiritual rebel. He meets Rumi, who at the time is a respected but somewhat rigid cleric. Their friendship is scandalous. People didn't get it then, and some readers today still struggle with the intensity of it. It’s a platonic, soul-level intimacy that transcends the rules of the society they lived in. Shams brings his forty rules, which serve as the backbone of the novel. These aren't just "rules" for romance; they are a manifesto for a life lived without fear.

Shams of Tabriz: The Original Disruptor

Shams wasn't interested in being liked. In the book, he’s depicted as abrasive, challenging, and deeply intuitive. He sees the "forty rules" as a way to strip away the ego. Take Rule Number One: "How we see God is a direct reflection of how we see ourselves." That’s heavy stuff for a Sunday afternoon read. If you see God as a punisher, it’s because you’re living in fear. If you see God as love, you’re ready to receive it.

💡 You might also like: Dutch Bros Menu Food: What Most People Get Wrong About the Snacks

The brilliance of Shafak’s characterization is that Shams isn't a saint in the traditional sense. He’s annoying. He’s disruptive. He ruins Rumi’s reputation. But through that ruin, Rumi becomes the poet whose words still sell millions of copies today. It’s about the "sweet blasphemy" of breaking human-made laws to find a higher truth.

Why People Get This Book Wrong

Most people think this is a romance novel. It’s not. Not really. If you go into The Forty Rules of Love by Elif Shafak expecting a "happily ever after" in the traditional sense, you’re going to be disappointed. Ella’s journey isn't about finding a better husband; it’s about finding herself. The ending is polarizing. Some people find it incredibly brave; others find it irresponsible.

There’s also a common misconception that the book is a literal historical biography. While Rumi and Shams were very real people, Shafak uses historical fiction to explore Sufi philosophy. She takes liberties. She fills in the gaps of their relationship with poetic license. This isn't a textbook. It’s a mirror.

The Sufi Philosophy Under the Surface

Sufism is the mystical dimension of Islam. It’s about the "inward" path. While many focus on the outward rituals of religion, Sufis like Shams were focused on the heart. Shafak highlights this through the various perspectives in the book. We don't just get Ella and Shams; we get the perspective of a beggar, a harlot, and a soldier.

📖 Related: Draft House Las Vegas: Why Locals Still Flock to This Old School Sports Bar

This multi-vocal approach shows that the "rules" apply to everyone, regardless of their station in life. It’s about the universality of suffering and the hope for redemption. One of the most impactful rules in the book is the idea that "The past is an interpretation. The future is an illusion." All we have is the now. For Ella, this means realizing that her past twenty years of marriage don't have to dictate her next twenty.

The Impact on Modern Readers

Why does a story about a 13th-century monk matter in 2026? Because we are all Ella. We are all living in a world of digital noise, constant comparison, and a feeling that something is missing. Shafak taps into a collective longing for depth.

The book has been translated into over forty languages. It’s a bestseller in Turkey, the UK, and across the Middle East. It resonates because it asks the big questions: Is it too late to change? Is love worth the risk of losing everything? Can you be spiritual without being religious?

Key Takeaways from the Rules

You don't have to memorize all forty to get the point, but a few stand out as particularly relevant for today’s world:

👉 See also: Dr Dennis Gross C+ Collagen Brighten Firm Vitamin C Serum Explained (Simply)

  • Rule 25: "Hell is in the here and now. So is heaven." This shifts the focus from a future reward to current accountability. If you’re miserable today, you’re in hell. Change it.
  • Rule 40: "A life without love is of no account." It sounds cheesy until you realize that "love" here refers to the energy that connects all living things.
  • Rule 11: "The midwife knows that when there is no pain, the way for the baby cannot be opened." This is Shafak’s way of saying that struggle is a prerequisite for growth. No pain, no spiritual gain.

Critical Reception and Nuance

It’s worth noting that some critics find the modern-day storyline with Ella a bit thin compared to the lush, historical world of Rumi. Ella’s transformation can feel fast. Her connection to Aziz, the author of the manuscript, happens mostly through emails. For some, this lacks the "weight" of the Shams/Rumi connection.

However, that might be the point. Modern life is thinner. Our connections are often digital and fleeting. The contrast highlights how far we’ve moved away from the deep, soul-shaking encounters that Shams practiced. Shafak isn't saying Ella is Rumi; she’s saying Ella is trying to find that same frequency in a world of microwave meals and suburban boredom.

Actionable Steps for Engaging with the Text

If you’re planning to read—or re-read—this book, don't just fly through it. It’s a slow-burn experience.

  • Read it with a notebook. Some of the rules will hit you harder than others. Write down the ones that make you uncomfortable. Usually, those are the ones you need the most.
  • Look up Rumi’s actual poetry. Read The Masnavi. Shafak’s book is a great "entry drug" to Sufi literature, but the source material is even more profound.
  • Question your own "unshakeable" rules. We all have them. "I can't quit this job," "I have to stay in this relationship," "I am not a creative person." Shams would tell you those are just walls you built yourself.
  • Watch interviews with Elif Shafak. She is an incredibly articulate thinker on issues of identity, belonging, and the power of storytelling. Understanding her background as a writer between two worlds (East and West) adds a lot of context to the novel.

The Forty Rules of Love by Elif Shafak remains a staple of modern literature because it doesn't offer easy answers. It offers a path. It suggests that the most important journey isn't across the world, but from the head to the heart. Whether you’re a CEO, a student, or a stay-at-home parent, there’s a version of Ella in you waiting for a Shams to show up and flip the table.

Start by identifying one area of your life where you are "playing it safe" out of fear. Apply Rule Number Six: "Most of the problems of the world stem from linguistic errors and simple misunderstanding. Never take words at face value." Look deeper into your own motivations. The transformation doesn't happen when you finish the book; it happens when you start living the rules.