Honestly, it’s hard to overstate how much the original Disney Lion King film changed the game back in 1994. It wasn't supposed to be the "big" one. While the studio's top-tier animators were busy pouring their souls into Pocahontas, which they assumed would be a prestige Oscar-winner, a "B-team" was tucked away working on a story about lions in Africa. They called it King of the Jungle at first, until someone realized lions don't actually live in the jungle. It was a scrappy project. But when that sun rose over the Savannah to the chanting of Lebo M., everything changed.
That opening sequence—The Circle of Life—is arguably the most powerful four minutes in animation history. No dialogue. Just pure, visual storytelling and a song that hits you in the chest. It was so effective that Disney famously used the entire scene as the first trailer for the movie. People lost their minds.
The Shakespearean Weight Behind the Animation
A lot of folks call it "Hamlet with lions," and they aren't wrong. You’ve got the murdered king, the usurping uncle, and the exiled prince talking to ghosts. But the writers, including Irene Mecchi and Jonathan Roberts, pulled from everywhere. There are bits of Joseph and Moses from the Bible in there too.
It’s heavy stuff for a kid's movie.
Think about the stampede. It isn't just a technical marvel; it's a traumatic core memory for an entire generation. The way the dust settles and Simba finds Mufasa's body is brutal. Disney didn't blink. They knew that for the "Hakuna Matata" philosophy to actually mean something later, the grief had to be real. If you don't feel the weight of Mufasa’s death, Simba’s growth into adulthood doesn't land.
Jeffrey Katzenberg, who was running Disney’s film division at the time, reportedly told the team that the movie was "experimental." He wasn't sure if people would buy into a story that was essentially a coming-of-age drama with no humans. He was wrong. The movie ended up pulling in over $760 million in its initial run.
👉 See also: Album Hopes and Fears: Why We Obsess Over Music That Doesn't Exist Yet
The Music That Redefined the Soundtrack
We have to talk about Elton John and Tim Rice. But we also have to talk about Hans Zimmer.
Before the Disney Lion King film, animated soundtracks were mostly Broadway-style show tunes. Think Beauty and the Beast. Zimmer brought a cinematic, orchestral scale that felt like a massive live-action epic. He brought in Lebo M., a South African composer, to give the film its soul. That "Nants ingonyama bagithi baba" chant at the beginning? That’s Lebo. Without that authentic South African influence, the movie would have felt like a hollow caricature.
It's actually pretty wild how close some of the songs came to being totally different. "Can You Feel the Love Tonight" was almost a comedic duet between Timon and Pumbaa. Elton John apparently hated that idea. He fought to keep it a classic love ballad, and he won an Oscar for it. Good call, Elton.
The Controversy: Kimba vs. Simba
You can't really have a deep conversation about this movie without mentioning Kimba the White Lion.
For years, fans of Osamu Tezuka’s 1960s anime have pointed out some pretty striking similarities. The protagonist's name. The shot of the lion on the jagged rock. The evil uncle with one eye. Disney has always maintained it was a coincidence. They claim the animators weren't aware of Kimba during production.
✨ Don't miss: The Name of This Band Is Talking Heads: Why This Live Album Still Beats the Studio Records
Whether it was "subconscious homage" or total coincidence, the debate still rages in animation circles today. Matthew Broderick, who voiced adult Simba, even mentioned in interviews that he thought he was working on a remake of Kimba when he first got the script. It’s a messy bit of history that adds a layer of complexity to the film's legacy.
The 2019 "Live-Action" Experiment
Then came 2019. Jon Favreau, fresh off the success of The Jungle Book, took a crack at a photorealistic version. Technically, it’s not live-action; it’s all CGI.
It made a staggering $1.6 billion.
But it split the fanbase right down the middle. On one hand, the technology was breathtaking. You could see every individual hair on Simba’s mane. On the other hand, lions in the real world don't have facial expressions like humans do. By choosing realism, the filmmakers lost the "squash and stretch" emotion that made the 1994 original so expressive. In the original, when Scar sneers, you feel his malice. In the 2019 version, he just looks like a slightly scruffy lion.
It raises an interesting question about what we want from our movies. Is better technology always better storytelling? Probably not. The 2019 version proved the brand is invincible, but it also highlighted why the hand-drawn artistry of the 90s is so special.
🔗 Read more: Wrong Address: Why This Nigerian Drama Is Still Sparking Conversations
Why It Still Matters in 2026
We’re now looking at a world where Mufasa: The Lion King (the prequel) is expanding the lore even further. People still care. Why?
Because the theme of "responsibility vs. running away" is universal. We’ve all had a moment where we wanted to just eat bugs and forget our problems. The "Hakuna Matata" lifestyle is tempting. But eventually, the past catches up. Rafiki hitting Simba over the head with a stick is the ultimate life lesson: "The past can hurt. But the way I see it, you can either run from it or learn from it."
Actionable Ways to Re-experience the Magic
If you’re looking to dive back into the Pride Lands, don’t just re-watch the movie for the hundredth time. There are better ways to appreciate the craft.
- Watch the "The Pride of the Lion King" Documentary: It’s available on most Blu-ray releases and some streaming platforms. It goes deep into the production struggles and the fact that most of the crew thought they were working on a "filler" movie.
- Listen to "Rhythm of the Pride Lands": This is a sequel album to the soundtrack. It’s not just movie songs; it’s an expansion of the African-inspired music by Lebo M. and Jay Rifkin. It’s arguably better than the actual film soundtrack.
- See the Broadway Show: If you haven’t, go. Julie Taymor’s costume design uses puppetry in a way that makes you forget you’re looking at humans. It’s a completely different artistic interpretation that fixes some of the "realism" issues of the 2019 film.
- Analyze the Storyboards: Look up the original storyboard art by Chris Sanders (who later did Lilo & Stitch). You can see how much of the film’s visual language was established in rough charcoal sketches.
The Disney Lion King film isn't just a movie anymore; it’s a cultural pillar. It survived the transition from VHS to 4K, from hand-drawn to CGI, and from the screen to the stage. It reminds us that even when we feel like outcasts, we have a place in the circle. Just stay away from the elephant graveyard. Seriously.
Steps to Take Now
To get the most out of the franchise's current state, start by comparing the vocal performances of Jeremy Irons and Chiwetel Ejiofor. Irons’ Scar is theatrical and snide, while Ejiofor’s is grounded and militaristic. Understanding these creative choices helps you see the films as distinct pieces of art rather than just "the old one" and "the new one."
Next, check out the early concept art for the "Be Prepared" sequence. The original vision was even darker, influenced heavily by 1930s propaganda films, which underscores how the directors weren't afraid to use sophisticated visual metaphors in a "family" movie. Finally, if you're interested in the future of the series, look into the production notes for the Barry Jenkins-directed prequel. Moving away from a direct remake and into a new story about Mufasa’s origins suggests Disney is finally ready to stop looking back and start building something fresh within this world.