If you’re scrolling through old war movies on a Sunday afternoon, you’ve probably stumbled across The Desert Rats. It’s black and white. It’s got Richard Burton looking incredibly intense. And honestly? It’s a lot better than most of the over-polished CGI war epics we get nowadays. Released in 1953, this movie is technically a "follow-up" to The Desert Fox, but it’s a completely different beast. It’s not a sequel in the way we think of Marvel movies. It’s a gritty, sweaty, claustrophobic look at the Siege of Tobruk.
People often get confused about the timeline. This film isn't about the whole North African campaign. It’s focused. Tight. It covers those nine brutal months in 1941 when the Australian 9th Division held out against Rommel’s forces in Libya.
The Desert Rats and the Problem with Hollywood History
Hollywood has a weird habit of rewriting history to make it more "cinematic." You see it all the time. But what’s interesting about The Desert Rats film is how it handles the Australian identity. Back in the fifties, 20th Century Fox was definitely trying to appeal to a global audience, yet they didn't totally wash away the "Digger" spirit.
Richard Burton plays Captain "Tammy" MacRoberts. He’s Scottish, not Australian. That’s a choice that reflects the era's casting logic. You needed a big, recognizable name to lead the marquee. But the men he commands? They are pure Aussie grit. There’s this recurring tension between the rigid British-style discipline MacRoberts tries to enforce and the laid-back, "call a spade a spade" attitude of the Australian soldiers.
Robert Wise directed this. If that name sounds familiar, it should. He did The Sound of Music and West Side Story, but before all that, he was a master of tension. He edited Citizen Kane. You can see that editing DNA in how the desert raids are paced. They feel frantic. Scared. Real.
James Mason’s Rommel: A Return Performance
One of the weirdest—and coolest—things about this movie is James Mason. He plays Field Marshal Erwin Rommel. Again. He had just played him two years earlier in The Desert Fox. In the first movie, Rommel was portrayed almost like a tragic hero, a "good" German caught in a bad system.
In The Desert Rats, the tone shifts. Mason is still charismatic, sure, but the movie doesn't hero-worship him as much. He’s the antagonist. He’s the wall the Australians are smashing their heads against. Mason reportedly spoke his lines with a slight German accent this time around, which he hadn't done in the previous film. Small detail, but it changes the vibe.
Why the Siege of Tobruk Mattered
You can't really appreciate the film without knowing what actually happened in 1941. Tobruk was a deep-water port. It was the only thing standing between Rommel and the Suez Canal. If Rommel took Tobruk, the British lose the Middle East. Simple as that.
The Germans called the defenders "rats" as an insult. They meant they were trapped in holes in the ground. The Australians took that insult and wore it like a badge of honor. "The Desert Rats." It stuck.
The movie captures that "hole in the ground" feeling perfectly. Most of the action isn't sweeping tank battles across miles of dunes. It’s men in trenches. It’s night patrols where you can’t see five feet in front of you. It’s the sound of boots on gravel and the constant, nagging fear of a mortar shell landing in your lap.
The Richard Burton Factor
This was one of Burton's earliest big roles. He was only about 27. You can see the raw power he had even then. He’s playing a man who is essentially a burnout. He’s tired. He’s cynical. He has to send men to their deaths every night, and he hates it.
There’s a specific scene where he has to confront his former schoolteacher, played by Robert Newton. Newton’s character is a drunk who’s terrified of combat. It’s a heavy, theatrical subplot that adds a layer of emotional weight most war movies from 1953 just didn't have. They usually went for "rah-rah" patriotism. This movie goes for "everything hurts and I'm exhausted."
Technical Brilliance in a Pre-Digital World
Let’s talk about the cinematography. Lucien Ballard shot this. He used high-contrast lighting that makes the desert look like another planet. The sand isn't gold; in black and white, it looks like ash.
They filmed a lot of this in Southern California, around Palm Springs and San Diego. If you know the area, you might recognize the terrain, but Ballard frames it so well you’d swear you’re in the Libyan desert. They used actual military hardware from the period, which gives the film a weight that modern movies struggle to replicate. When a tank moves in this movie, you feel the mass of it. It doesn’t bounce around like a video game asset. It’s heavy. It’s loud. It’s terrifying.
Critics at the time were a bit mixed. Some Australians were annoyed that the lead character was a Scot. Others felt it was too similar to The Desert Fox. But looking back, it stands on its own. It’s a character study masquerading as a war flick.
Common Misconceptions About the Film
- It’s not a biopic: Even though Rommel is in it, this isn't his story. It’s about the collective endurance of the 9th Division.
- The "Desert Rats" nickname: While the movie focuses on the Australians at Tobruk, the nickname "Desert Rats" originally belonged to the British 7th Armoured Division. The movie (and history) shows how the term became more broadly associated with the defenders of the desert.
- Historical Accuracy: For a 1950s film, it's surprisingly accurate regarding the tactics of the siege, though it obviously simplifies the geopolitics.
The Legacy of The Desert Rats film
What’s the takeaway here? Why should you care about a 70-year-old movie?
Because it’s honest about the cost of war. It doesn't pretend that every soldier is a fearless hero. It shows men who are scared, men who drink too much to cope, and leaders who are hanging on by a thread. In a world of "superhero" war movies, The Desert Rats feels human.
If you want to understand the cinematic evolution of the "gritty war movie," you have to watch this. It’s the bridge between the propaganda of the 1940s and the realism of the 1970s.
👉 See also: Where to Watch Boys Planet 2: How to Stream the Stardust Boys Sequel
How to Watch and What to Look For
If you’re going to sit down and watch it, pay attention to the sound design. For 1953, the use of silence is incredible. There are long stretches where the only thing you hear is wind and the occasional clink of metal. It builds a level of anxiety that most modern directors would try to fill with a loud orchestral score.
Also, watch Robert Newton. He was a huge star (the original Long John Silver!), and his performance as the "cowardly" teacher is heartbreaking. He died only a few years after this film came out, and you can see the wear and tear on him.
Actionable Insights for History and Film Buffs:
- Compare and Contrast: Watch The Desert Fox (1951) and The Desert Rats (1953) back-to-back. It’s a fascinating look at how the same studio and the same actor (James Mason) can portray the same historical figure differently based on the perspective of the story.
- Verify the Geography: If you're a geography nerd, look up the actual maps of the Tobruk "Red Line" and "Blue Line" defenses. The film does a solid job of showing how the perimeter was structured.
- Check the Cast: Look for a young Charles "Bud" Tingwell. He was a real-world RAAF pilot during WWII and brings an authenticity to his role that you can't fake.
- Source Material: Read up on the actual 9th Australian Division. The film is a great entry point, but the real-life stories of the "Rats of Tobruk" are even more intense, involving months of living on nothing but bully beef and brackish water.
The film is currently available on various streaming platforms like Amazon Prime (depending on your region) or can be found in high-quality Blu-ray restorations. It's worth the hour and a half of your time.
Next Steps for Research:
- Search for the "Rats of Tobruk Association" to find first-hand accounts from the men who inspired the film.
- Look up Robert Wise’s filmography to see how his editing background influenced the pacing of the night-raid sequences.
- Explore the 1941 North African campaign maps to see exactly why that small port city was worth so many lives.