Honestly, it’s kinda weird how fast things moved back then. Back in 2005, you couldn’t go anywhere without seeing a lion’s face on a cereal box or hearing that sweeping Harry Gregson-Williams score. Disney was betting the farm on Chronicles of Narnia films being the next Lord of the Rings. For a minute there, it actually worked. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe pulled in over $745 million globally, which is just massive. But then, the magic sorta fizzled out. Why?
It wasn't just one thing. It was a messy mix of studio politics, shifting tastes, and the sheer difficulty of adapting C.S. Lewis’s increasingly weird books. If you look at the trajectory from Disney to Fox and now to the looming Netflix era, the history of these movies is less of a straight line and more of a jagged cliff.
The High Peak of the Pevensies
When Walden Media teamed up with Disney for the first movie, they caught lightning in a bottle. Tilda Swinton was terrifying. The kids actually felt like kids. It felt like a "prestige" fantasy. People forget that before the Chronicles of Narnia films hit theaters, everyone was looking for the "next big thing" to fill the void left by Peter Jackson’s Middle-earth.
But Prince Caspian changed the vibe. It was darker. Grittier. And way more expensive. Disney spent somewhere around $225 million making it, and it "only" made $419 million. In Hollywood math, that’s basically a disaster. The tone shift was jarring for families who wanted more talking beavers and less political intrigue about Telmarine succession rights. It’s funny because, looking back, Caspian is probably the most technically impressive film of the three, but it’s where the momentum died. Disney basically said "we're out," and 20th Century Fox had to pick up the pieces for The Voyage of the Dawn Treader.
Why Dawn Treader Couldn't Save the Franchise
By the time The Voyage of the Dawn Treader arrived in 2010, the production had moved to Australia to save money. The budget was trimmed. The Pevensie cast was shrinking because, well, the books literally kick the older kids out of Narnia. That’s a tough sell for a movie franchise. You spend two movies making people love William Moseley and Anna Popplewell, then tell the audience, "Sorry, they’re too old for magic now."
🔗 Read more: Anjelica Huston in The Addams Family: What You Didn't Know About Morticia
The third film tried to go back to the "magical adventure" feel of the first one, but it felt... smaller. Even though it did okay at the box office, the creative spark was fading. The Chronicles of Narnia films were suffering from a lack of a consistent vision. Each movie felt like it was made by a different committee. Michael Apted, the director of the third film, brought a very different energy than Andrew Adamson did for the first two. It felt like a TV movie with a big budget.
The Silver Chair That Never Was
For years, we heard about The Silver Chair. Joe Johnston, the guy who directed Captain America: The First Avenger, was attached. It was supposed to be a "reboot" of sorts. No Pevensies (except Eustace). A whole new vibe. Fans waited. And waited. Basically, the rights just sat there until they expired, which is how we ended up in the current situation with Netflix.
The C.S. Lewis Problem: Adapting the "Unadaptable"
There is a fundamental issue with turning Lewis’s work into a cinematic universe. Unlike Tolkien, who built a meticulous, consistent world, Lewis was kinda chaotic. He threw Father Christmas into a world with Greek fauns. He didn’t care about "lore" as much as he cared about the allegory and the "feeling" of the story.
As the books progress, they get stranger. The Silver Chair is a claustrophobic journey underground. The Horse and His Boy takes place almost entirely outside of Narnia in a different culture. The Last Battle is... well, it’s an apocalyptic nightmare that involves a railway accident and a giant monkey. How do you market that to kids in a way that sells toys? You probably don't. That’s the wall the Chronicles of Narnia films hit. The further you go, the less they feel like "fun family blockbusters."
💡 You might also like: Isaiah Washington Movies and Shows: Why the Star Still Matters
The Netflix Era: Greta Gerwig and the Future
So, here we are. Netflix bought the rights to all seven books back in 2018. It’s the first time one company has owned the rights to the entire catalog. For a long time, it was radio silence. Then, the bombshell: Greta Gerwig is signed on to write and direct at least two movies.
This is a wild choice, but honestly? It’s the smartest move they could make. Gerwig knows how to handle beloved, "stiff" intellectual property and give it a soul—just look at Little Women or Barbie. She understands that Narnia isn't about the CGI battles. It’s about that weird, melancholic feeling of growing up and losing something you can't quite name.
What We Know About the New Projects
- Production hasn't officially started filming, but scripts are in development.
- It’s not just movies. The deal includes "series," meaning we might get deep dives into the side stories.
- The tone will likely be "literary." Netflix is positioning this as their Lord of the Rings equivalent, but with a more whimsical, artistic edge.
Making Sense of the Narnia Timeline
If you're trying to rewatch or get into the Chronicles of Narnia films now, the order is straightforward but the quality is all over the place.
- The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (2005) – The gold standard. If you only watch one, it's this.
- Prince Caspian (2008) – Great action, very moody, but it loses the "magic" for some.
- The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (2010) – Episodic and a bit cheap-looking, but Will Poulter as Eustace is a highlight.
There were also the BBC versions from the late 80s. They have cardboard sets and people in giant beaver suits. They are objectively "bad" by modern standards, yet they capture the spirit of the books in a way the big movies sometimes missed. They’re worth a look if you can handle the nostalgia-induced whiplash.
📖 Related: Temuera Morrison as Boba Fett: Why Fans Are Still Divided Over the Daimyo of Tatooine
What Most People Get Wrong About Narnia
Everyone thinks Narnia is just a "Christian allegory." Lewis himself actually hated that term. He called it a "supposal." As in, suppose Christ came to a world of talking animals. It sounds like a small distinction, but it changes how the movies work. When the films try to be too much like The Chronicles of Narnia (the books) and hit the religious beats too hard, they can feel preachy. When they ignore it entirely, they feel hollow.
The successful Chronicles of Narnia films are the ones that balance the wonder of discovery with the weight of the stakes. You have to believe that Narnia matters—not just as a playground, but as a place with a soul.
Moving Forward with the Wardrobe
If you're a fan waiting for the next trip through the wardrobe, the best thing you can do is temper your expectations for a "faithful" 1:1 adaptation. The books are too thin for modern feature films. They need expanding. They need more character depth.
Actionable Steps for Fans and Collectors:
- Track down the "Extended Edition" of the first film. It adds small character moments that make the Pevensie sibling dynamic feel much more real.
- Read "The Magician's Nephew" before the Netflix reboot. There’s a high chance Gerwig might start at the beginning of the chronology rather than the beginning of the publication order. It's the origin story of the wardrobe and the White Witch, and it's arguably Lewis's best prose.
- Keep an eye on the "London" production trades. Reports suggest Netflix is looking for a very specific "classic" British feel for the cast, likely avoiding the "superhero" look of modern fantasy.
The Chronicles of Narnia films have had a rocky road, but the brand is too big to stay dead. We’re currently in that quiet moment before the door opens again. Whether it’s a snowy forest or a salty sea on the other side, the world is clearly ready to go back. Just don't expect the same Narnia you saw in 2005. It's going to be something much more modern, and hopefully, much more strange.