John Cleese actually cried when he finished writing the script. Not because it was sad, but because he knew he’d finally nailed the mechanics of a perfect farce. If you haven’t revisited the characters in A Fish Called Wanda lately, you’re missing out on a masterclass in how to pit British repression against American narcissism. It isn't just a heist movie. It’s a collision of egos where everyone thinks they’re the smartest person in the room, and everyone is dead wrong.
Most comedies from 1988 feel dated. The jokes land like lead. But this film remains a staple because the archetypes are so sharply defined. You have the uptight barrister, the femme fatale who gets turned on by foreign languages, the hitman who loves animals more than people, and a "pseudo-intellectual" who can’t stand being called stupid.
The Brilliant Frustration of Archie Leach
John Cleese played Archie Leach, a name that was actually Cary Grant’s real birth name. That’s not a coincidence. Archie is the embodiment of the "Stiff Upper Lip" trope pushed to its breaking point. He’s a bored London barrister trapped in a lifeless marriage and a sterile social circle.
When he meets Wanda, his world doesn't just change—it implodes. Archie represents the audience's desire to break free from the mundane. His vulnerability is what makes the comedy work. Think about the scene where he’s dancing naked in a borrowed flat only to be interrupted by a family of strangers. It’s humiliating. It’s painful. It’s hilarious. Cleese understood that for a character like Archie to be funny, he had to lose every ounce of his dignity.
Archie isn't a hero. He’s a man having a mid-life crisis with a side of grand larceny. His chemistry with Jamie Lee Curtis works because they are both using each other, but Archie is the only one who actually catches feelings. It makes him the moral, albeit bumbling, center of the chaos.
Wanda Gershwitz and the Power of Manipulation
Jamie Lee Curtis was a revelation here. Before this, she was mostly the "Scream Queen" from Halloween. In this film, she’s the engine. Wanda Gershwitz is a con artist who realizes that men are essentially simple machines powered by lust and ego.
She uses her sexuality like a tool, but the genius of the character is her "intellectual" fetish. She gets physically weak in the knees when a man speaks Italian or Russian. It’s a bizarre, specific character trait that adds a layer of absurdity to her manipulations. Wanda is constantly juggling three different men—George, Ken, and Otto—while trying to secure a fortune in diamonds.
- She plays George for his leadership.
- She plays Ken for his loyalty (and the keys).
- She plays Otto for his muscle, even though he drives her crazy.
- She plays Archie for the legal inside track.
But Wanda’s arc is about finding someone who actually treats her like a person rather than a prize or a pawn. By the end, her shift toward Archie feels earned because he’s the only one who doesn't treat her like an object, even if he is incredibly awkward about it.
💡 You might also like: How to Watch The Wolf and the Lion Without Getting Lost in the Wild
Otto: The Greatest "Stupid" Person in Cinema
Kevin Kline won an Oscar for this. Let that sink in. It’s incredibly rare for a pure comedic performance to win an Academy Award, but Otto West is a force of nature. Otto is a mercenary who thinks he’s an intellectual because he reads Nietzsche, but as Wanda famously points out, he doesn't actually understand what he reads.
"The central message of Buddhism is not 'Every man for himself,' Otto!"
He is the personification of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Otto is dangerous because he is violent, but he is pathetic because he is deeply insecure about his intelligence. If you want to see Otto lose his mind, just call him "stupid." He’ll dangle you off a balcony or eat your pet fish just to prove a point.
The dynamic between Otto and the other characters in A Fish Called Wanda is where the friction lives. He hates the British. He thinks they’re "wimps" and "losers." His xenophobia is played for laughs because it’s so irrational and loud. Otto is the ultimate American stereotype through a British lens: loud, arrogant, obsessed with guns, and convinced of his own brilliance despite evidence to the contrary.
Ken Pile and the Dark Comedy of Stuttering
Michael Palin’s Ken Pile is a controversial character today, but Palin (whose own father had a severe stutter) played the role with an incredible amount of empathy. Ken is a shy, animal-loving hitman who is tasked with "eliminating" an elderly witness.
The "Old Lady" subplot is a masterclass in dark comedy. Ken keeps trying to kill Mrs. Coady, but he accidentally kills her dogs instead. One by one. The sight of Ken’s genuine grief over the death of a Yorkshire Terrier—while he’s actively trying to murder a human being—is the kind of twisted irony that Python-esque humor is built on.
Ken is the underdog. He’s bullied by Otto throughout the entire movie. When Ken finally gets his revenge by driving a steamroller over Otto (at approximately two miles per hour), it’s one of the most satisfying payoffs in film history. It’s a moment where the most "powerless" character finally takes control of the narrative.
📖 Related: Is Lincoln Lawyer Coming Back? Mickey Haller's Next Move Explained
Why the Ensemble Dynamic Works
You can't talk about these characters in isolation. They are a clockwork mechanism. If you remove the tension between Otto’s ego and Archie’s repression, the movie falls apart.
George Thomason, played by Tom Georgeson, is the "straight man" who sets the plot in motion. He’s the only one who actually knows where the diamonds are for most of the film. His arrest is the catalyst. Without George as the grounded criminal, the other characters would just be drifting in space. He provides the stakes.
Then there’s the locations. London in the 80s feels like a character itself. The grey, rainy, buttoned-up streets of the city provide the perfect backdrop for the colorful, loud, and messy heist crew. The contrast is visual and thematic.
A Masterclass in Scripting
The script took years to perfect. Cleese and director Charles Crichton spent an enormous amount of time ensuring that every character’s motivation was airtight. No one does anything "because the plot needs it." They do things because of who they are.
- Otto eats the fish because he’s a bully and wants to hurt Ken.
- Archie lies to his wife because he’s terrified of confrontation.
- Ken stutters more when he’s stressed, which leads to the crucial delay in information.
- Wanda kisses Archie because she needs the diamonds, but stays with him because he’s kind.
Real-World Impact and Legacy
When the movie came out, it was a massive hit. It proved that "British" humor could be a global powerhouse if it was paired with the right American energy. It also showed that you could have a cast of protagonists where almost none of them are "good" people, yet the audience still roots for them.
We root for Archie because we want him to be happy. We root for Wanda because she’s smarter than everyone else. We even sort of root for Ken because we want him to stand up for himself. Otto is the only one we love to hate, and even then, Kevin Kline makes him so charismatic that you can’t look away.
How to Analyze Farce Like a Pro
If you’re looking at these characters for a film study or just because you’re a fan, pay attention to the "Information Gap."
👉 See also: Tim Dillon: I'm Your Mother Explained (Simply)
In a good farce, the characters always know different things.
- Archie doesn't know Otto is Wanda's "brother."
- Otto doesn't know Wanda is planning to double-cross him.
- Ken knows where the diamonds are, but can’t get the words out.
The comedy comes from the audience being the only ones who have the full picture. It creates a sense of "dramatic irony" that keeps you on the edge of your seat. You aren't just waiting for the next joke; you’re waiting for the inevitable moment when all these lies collide.
Actionable Insights for Fans and Writers
If you want to apply the brilliance of these characters to your own understanding of storytelling or just get more out of your next rewatch, keep these points in mind:
- Conflict stems from personality, not just goals. The heist is the goal, but the conflict comes from Otto’s jealousy and Archie’s insecurity.
- Specific quirks matter. Wanda’s love for languages isn't just a gag; it’s a plot device that allows Archie to woo her.
- Humiliation is a powerful tool. The more a character tries to keep their dignity (like Archie), the funnier it is when they lose it.
- Contrast is king. Put a loud American in a quiet British courtroom and watch the sparks fly.
To truly appreciate the characters in A Fish Called Wanda, you have to watch the small physical choices. Look at the way Kevin Kline sniffs his own armpits to check his pheromones. Notice how John Cleese adjusts his tie when he’s nervous. These aren't just lines in a script; they are fully realized people who feel like they existed before the cameras started rolling and continued to exist after the credits crawled.
The film ends with a series of title cards telling us what happened to the characters. Archie and Wanda move to Rio and have a bunch of kids. Ken becomes a master of ceremonies at a zoo. Otto becomes a right-wing minister in South Africa (a joke that felt very pointed in 1988). It’s a perfect ending because it acknowledges that these people were too big for the small heist they were involved in. They were always destined for something more absurd.
Check out the original trailers or behind-the-scenes interviews with John Cleese. He often talks about the "math" of comedy. Watching this film is like watching a genius solve a complex equation where the answer is always a laugh. Whether it's the 10th time or the first time, the interplay between these four leads is as close to comedic perfection as cinema has ever stayed.