It is a massive, uncomfortable paradox. You can’t talk about the history of movies without talking about D.W. Griffith’s The Birth of a Nation 1915, but you also can’t talk about it without acknowledging it as one of the most destructive pieces of propaganda ever filmed. It’s the "big bang" of Hollywood. Almost every trick you see in a modern blockbuster—close-ups, cross-cutting, massive battle sequences—basically started here. Yet, it also single-handedly revived the Ku Klux Klan.
Honestly, it’s a mess.
If you’ve never sat through all three hours of it, you’re missing the blueprint for how cinema was invented and how it was weaponized. It was the first film ever screened at the White House. Woodrow Wilson supposedly said it was like "writing history with lightning," though historians still debate if he actually uttered those exact words or if the film's publicist just made them up to sell more tickets. Regardless, the impact was real. People didn’t just watch this movie; they reacted to it with a fervor that led to actual violence and a decades-long shift in American race relations.
The Technical Genius That Changed Everything
Griffith was obsessed. Before The Birth of a Nation 1915, movies were mostly short, static clips of people walking or trains moving. They were "flickers" shown in nickelodeons. Griffith wanted something grand. He used a massive budget of $110,000—unheard of at the time—to create an epic spanning the Civil War and Reconstruction.
He pioneered the "iris shot," where the frame closes in a circle to highlight a specific detail. He used "cross-cutting" to build tension, jumping between two different scenes happening at once to make your heart race. You see this today in every action movie climax. Without Griffith’s experimentation, we might still be watching movies that look like filmed stage plays. He understood that the camera could be a storyteller, not just a witness. He moved it. He panned it. He made the audience feel like they were in the middle of the Petersburg trenches.
📖 Related: Wrong Address: Why This Nigerian Drama Is Still Sparking Conversations
The scale was terrifyingly impressive. Thousands of extras. Real horses. Pyrotechnics. It was the first "blockbuster" in every sense of the word. People paid two dollars a ticket when the average movie cost five cents. It was an event. It stayed in theaters for years.
The Poison in the Well
Here is where it gets dark. The movie is based on Thomas Dixon Jr.’s novel The Clansman. Dixon was a staunch white supremacist, and the film reflects that perfectly. It portrays the post-war South as a victimized land where the KKK are the "knights" saving civilization. It’s hard to watch today—not just because of the blackface, which is everywhere, but because of the underlying message that democracy fails when certain people are allowed to participate in it.
The NAACP tried to ban it. They protested in cities like Boston and New York, correctly arguing that the film would incite racial hatred. They were right. Following the film’s release, the KKK, which had basically been dead since the late 1800s, saw a massive resurgence. William Joseph Simmons famously burned a cross on Stone Mountain just months after the movie premiered, specifically citing the film as his inspiration.
It wasn't just a movie. It was a recruitment tool.
👉 See also: Who was the voice of Yoda? The real story behind the Jedi Master
The film’s portrayal of Black men—mostly white actors in burnt cork—as predatory and incompetent was a deliberate attempt to justify Jim Crow laws. It’s a textbook example of how "high art" can be used to sell low-level hate. Even the most stunning cinematography in the world can’t mask the fact that the movie celebrates a domestic terrorist organization as a heroic force.
Why We Still Can’t Ignore It
Some people say we should just bury it. Delete it from the archives. But that’s dangerous because The Birth of a Nation 1915 explains so much about how media influence works. If you understand how Griffith manipulated his audience in 1915, you start to see how modern political ads or social media algorithms do the same thing today.
Film historians like Donald Bogle have spent years breaking down the tropes Griffith established. The "Tom," the "Coon," the "Tragic Mulatto"—these weren't just random choices. They were archetypes designed to reinforce a specific social hierarchy. Every time you see a movie that relies on lazy stereotypes, you’re seeing the ghost of D.W. Griffith.
Interestingly, the backlash to the film actually helped kickstart the "Race Film" industry. Black filmmakers like Oscar Micheaux began making their own movies specifically to counter the narrative Griffith put forward. Micheaux’s Within Our Gates (1920) is often seen as a direct response, showing the reality of lynching and white supremacy from a Black perspective.
✨ Don't miss: Not the Nine O'Clock News: Why the Satirical Giant Still Matters
So, in a weird, twisted way, the hatred in Griffith's film forced the birth of independent Black cinema.
A Legacy of Conflict
The movie is currently in the public domain. You can watch it on YouTube or Internet Archive. It’s a slog. It’s slow by modern standards, and the blatant racism is exhausting. But if you look at the way the camera moves, you see the birth of the language we use to tell stories today.
We are stuck with it. We have to acknowledge its technical brilliance while simultaneously condemning its soul. It's the ultimate "separate the art from the artist" test, and honestly, most people fail it because the two are so deeply intertwined here. You can't have the innovations without the ideology they were built to serve.
How to Approach This History Today
If you're looking to actually understand the impact of this film beyond a Wikipedia summary, there are a few things you should do. Don't just watch the movie in a vacuum.
- Watch '13th' on Netflix. Ava DuVernay’s documentary does an incredible job of tracing the line from The Birth of a Nation 1915 to the modern prison-industrial complex.
- Read 'Bright Boulevards, Bold Dreams' by Donald Bogle. It gives you the context of what Black Hollywood was actually like during the era of Griffith and how they fought back.
- Compare the editing. Watch the "Ride of the Klansmen" scene alongside the helicopter attack in Apocalypse Now. The rhythmic editing is almost identical. It’s a chilling reminder of how techniques of "excitement" are neutral, but the context is everything.
- Check out the Library of Congress notes. They keep the film in the National Film Registry not because it's "good," but because it's "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant." Understanding that distinction is key to media literacy.
The best way to "handle" this movie is to treat it like a specimen. Study it. See how it works. Recognize the techniques of manipulation so you can spot them when they show up in your feed today. The 1915 premiere was over a century ago, but the way it taught us to see—and hate—still hasn't fully faded from the screen.