It was 2017. Disney was deep in its "live-action remake" fever, and the stakes for Beauty and the Beast were arguably higher than anything they’d touched before. You can’t just mess with a Howard Ashman and Alan Menken masterpiece. When the news dropped that Ariana Grande and John Legend were taking on the title track, the internet basically went into a tailspin. People were skeptical. Celine Dion and Peabo Bryson’s 1991 original isn’t just a song; it’s a pillar of pop culture history.
Honestly, filling those shoes is a nightmare for any vocalist.
But here’s the thing about the beauty and the beast by ariana grande collaboration: it wasn’t trying to be a carbon copy. It was a strategic, polished, and very "2010s" reimagining that served a specific purpose for Disney’s brand evolution. It’s been years since the film hit theaters, yet the track still pulls millions of streams. Why? Because it represents a specific moment where theater-kid energy met peak pop stardom.
The Impossible Task of Following Celine Dion
Let’s be real for a second. Celine Dion has a voice that can cut through steel. Peabo Bryson is the king of the silky R&B ballad. Their version won an Oscar, a Golden Globe, and two Grammys. It’s untouchable. When Disney tapped Ariana Grande to lead the 2017 version, they weren't looking for a replica. They wanted someone who could bridge the gap between the Broadway-heavy roots of the story and the Spotify-driven charts of the current era.
Ariana was already a powerhouse, but this was a different beast. Pun intended.
Critics at the time were split. Some felt the production—handled by Ron Fair—was a bit too heavy on the vocal layering. Others loved the way Legend’s soulful, grounded tone acted as an anchor for Ariana’s higher-register flourishes. If you listen closely to the beauty and the beast by ariana grande arrangement, it’s actually quite different from the '91 version. The tempo feels slightly modernized, and the orchestral swells are swapped for a cleaner, more contemporary pop-ballad production. It’s shorter, punchier, and designed for radio play just as much as it was for the closing credits.
The Chemistry Factor
Did Ariana and John Legend actually have chemistry? It’s a debate fans still have on Reddit threads today. In the music video, which was directed by Dave Meyers, Ariana is draped in a massive, rose-petal-inspired red gown, surrounded by dancers who literally form a giant flower. It’s high-concept. It’s theatrical.
Legend sits at the piano, looking cool as always.
While they didn't have the "lived-in" vocal blend that Dion and Bryson shared, they offered a technical precision that was undeniable. Grande’s ability to hit those whistle notes and soft head-voice runs added a "fairytale" texture that worked. She grew up on musical theater. She knows how to tell a story with a lyric, which is why her involvement in the Wicked film years later felt like such an organic progression. This cover was a stepping stone.
👉 See also: The Entire History of You: What Most People Get Wrong About the Grain
Breaking Down the Production Choices
Ron Fair, the producer behind the track, has a history of working with massive vocalists like Christina Aguilera. He knew he couldn't play it safe. If they made it too "Broadway," the kids wouldn't stream it. If they made it too "Trap-Pop," the Disney purists would revolt with torches and pitchforks.
They landed somewhere in the middle.
The track starts with that iconic tinkling piano melody. You know the one. It’s the musical equivalent of a warm hug. But once the beat kicks in, it’s got a slight "snap" to it. It’s subtle. You might not even notice it unless you’re looking for it. This was the era of "streaming-friendly" ballads. They needed a low-end frequency that would sound good in AirPods, not just over a cinema sound system.
Grande’s performance is surprisingly restrained for the first half. She doesn't over-sing. She waits for the bridge to really let loose. That’s the mark of a pro. Legend, meanwhile, brings that "All of Me" sincerity. He doesn't try to out-sing her; he provides the floor so she can be the ceiling. It’s a classic duet dynamic that rarely happens in modern pop anymore, where everyone is fighting for the loudest line.
What Most People Get Wrong About the 2017 Version
A common complaint you’ll hear is that the beauty and the beast by ariana grande version is "too processed." People point to the Auto-Tune or the vocal stacking as a flaw. But that’s a misunderstanding of the medium. In 2017, the aesthetic of pop was hyper-clean.
- The "processed" sound was a stylistic choice to match the CGI-heavy visuals of the film.
- It wasn't about "fixing" Ariana’s voice—we know she can sing live—it was about creating a specific "gloss."
- The track was meant to introduce a new generation of toddlers to a song their parents already knew by heart.
Think about the context. Disney was trying to prove that their live-action slate wasn't just a gimmick. They needed star power. At that moment, nobody was bigger than Ariana. By putting her on the soundtrack, they guaranteed a level of social media engagement that a traditional theater singer simply couldn't provide. It was a business move as much as an artistic one. And it worked. The song went Gold in the US and Platinum in several other territories.
The Impact on Ariana’s Career
At the time, Ariana was transitioning from "Dangerous Woman" to "Sweetener." She was moving away from the pure Nickelodeon image and into something more sophisticated. Taking on a Disney classic was a "safe" way to maintain her massive young fan base while proving she had the vocal chops to handle "prestige" material.
It also solidified her relationship with the Disney machine.
✨ Don't miss: Shamea Morton and the Real Housewives of Atlanta: What Really Happened to Her Peach
She’s always been vocal about her love for the classics. She even performed "Won't Say I'm In Love" from Hercules during a Disney family singalong special during the 2020 lockdowns. You can see the DNA of the beauty and the beast by ariana grande cover in her later work—that blend of cinematic strings and modern R&B phrasing. It’s her signature.
Comparing the Live Performances
There aren't many. Unlike "7 Rings" or "Thank U, Next," Ariana didn't make this a staple of her tour setlists. It was a project "for the brand." However, the few times she and Legend did perform or promote it, the technical difficulty of the song became apparent. It’s a marathon. You’re jumping octaves. You’re sustaining long, vibrato-heavy notes while trying to look like a princess.
It’s exhausting just thinking about it.
Legend has mentioned in interviews that singing with Ariana is like trying to keep up with a Ferrari. She’s fast, she’s agile, and she’s got a range that most singers would kill for. The 2017 version of the song actually sits a bit higher in the key than the original, likely to accommodate Ariana’s "sweet spot."
Why It Still Shows Up on Playlists
If you go to any Disney-themed wedding today, you’re probably going to hear this version during the dinner service. It’s become the "modern standard." While the 1991 version is the "legendary" one, the 2017 version is the "functional" one for modern speakers and younger ears.
It’s interesting to see how the song has aged.
While some "dated" pop songs from 2017 sound thin or overly "EDM-lite," the orchestral backbone of this track keeps it feeling somewhat timeless. It’s a hybrid. It’s a bridge between the 90s and the 2020s. For a lot of Gen Z, this is the version of the song they know best. They don’t see it as a cover; they see it as the definitive version for their era.
The Music Video's Visual Legacy
We can't talk about this song without the visuals. Dave Meyers is a legend in the industry, and he turned the castle’s ballroom into a literal fever dream. The use of the dancers to create the rose was a stroke of genius. It gave the song a "moment" that helped it go viral on YouTube.
🔗 Read more: Who is Really in the Enola Holmes 2 Cast? A Look at the Faces Behind the Mystery
- The red dress: A massive fashion moment that felt like a nod to the rose under the glass.
- The choreography: Simple but effective, emphasizing the "magic" of the setting.
- The lighting: Warm, golden, and expensive-looking.
It wasn't just a music video; it was a three-minute commercial for the film’s "vibe." It sold the idea that this remake was going to be grander and more "extra" than the original.
Real-World Advice for Vocalists Covering This Track
If you’re a singer looking to tackle the beauty and the beast by ariana grande arrangement, don’t try to mimic her exactly. Her "breathiness" is a stylistic choice that requires an insane amount of air control. Most people who try to do the "Ariana voice" end up sounding like they’re whispering through a fan.
Instead, focus on the dynamics.
The 2017 version succeeds because it knows when to be quiet and when to be loud. If you start at a 10, you have nowhere to go. Start at a 3. Build to a 6 during the first chorus. Save the 10 for that final "Beauty and the Beeeeeeast" belt. And if you’re doing the duet, find a partner who doesn't mind being the "support." This song fails when both singers are trying to be the lead.
The Verdict on the 2017 Remake
Is it better than the original? No. Is it a worthy successor? Absolutely.
The beauty and the beast by ariana grande and John Legend collaboration did exactly what it needed to do. It updated a classic without breaking it. It gave Ariana a chance to flex her musical theater muscles and gave Disney a hit that helped propel the movie to over $1 billion at the global box office.
It’s a masterclass in "brand-safe" pop.
It might not have the raw, emotional soul of the Peabo Bryson version, but it has a sparkle and a technical perfection that is very much of its time. It’s a snapshot of 2017 pop culture, wrapped in a yellow dress and sprinkled with rose petals.
If you haven't listened to it in a while, go back and put on a good pair of headphones. Ignore the "it’s a remake" bias and just listen to the vocal layers in the final chorus. The way Ariana’s harmonies wrap around Legend’s lead is actually pretty stunning from a technical standpoint.
How to Enjoy the Full "Beauty and the Beast" Experience
If you want to dive deeper into the music of this era, there are a few things you should do to get the full context:
- Listen to the "Comparison Mix": Find a YouTube video that plays the 1991 and 2017 versions side-by-side. It’s the best way to hear the subtle tempo and key changes.
- Watch the "Behind the Scenes": There’s footage of Ariana and John in the studio. Seeing them work out the harmonies gives you a lot more respect for the final product.
- Check out the Emma Thompson version: Don't forget that the "in-movie" version sung by Mrs. Potts is the emotional core. The Ariana version is the "radio" version. They serve different purposes.
- Explore the "Sweetener" era: If you like Ariana's vocals here, listen to her album Sweetener, which was recorded around the same time and features similar vocal layering techniques.