It is arguably the most famous image in human history. Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin standing on the lunar surface with the Stars and Stripes. But honestly, if you look closely at that first photo flag on moon shot from 1969, something feels off to the casual observer. The fabric appears to be rippling. There is a distinct "wave" in the material. Since the Moon has no atmosphere and certainly no wind, this single visual detail has fueled decades of late-night living room debates and internet rabbit holes.
The truth is actually way more interesting than the conspiracy theories. It’s a story of low-tech engineering meeting high-stakes photography.
The engineering behind the ripple
NASA knew there was no wind. Obviously. They weren't going to send a standard flagpole up there just to have the flag hang limp and invisible against the pole. That would have been a public relations disaster. To solve this, engineers at the Manned Spacecraft Center designed a specialized horizontal crossbar. This "L-shaped" bracket held the top edge of the flag out so it would remain visible to the cameras.
But things didn't go perfectly.
On the Apollo 11 mission, Armstrong and Aldrin struggled to get the horizontal telescopic arm to extend all the way. It jammed. Because they couldn't pull the fabric taut, the nylon remained bunched up. This created those permanent "waves" you see in the photo flag on moon. It wasn't wind; it was a mechanical snag. Interestingly, later astronauts liked the look so much that they intentionally left the flags a bit ruffled. They thought it looked more "majestic" than a flat, boring rectangle.
Space is harsh.
The flag itself was just a standard $5.50 nylon flag bought from a local Houston store, likely Sears or Newtex. It wasn't some high-tech space fabric. NASA didn't even want to give the manufacturer credit at the time because they didn't want to seem like they were endorsing a specific brand.
Gravity, dust, and 1-inch poles
When you see the flag "moving" in the video footage, you’re seeing inertia. When the astronauts were twisting the pole into the lunar regolith (the Moon's soil), the flag swung back and forth. In a vacuum, there’s no air resistance to slow that swinging down. It lingers. It persists.
💡 You might also like: The iPhone 5c Release Date: What Most People Get Wrong
The soil was also way tougher than they expected.
Buzz Aldrin later noted that they only managed to get the pole about six inches into the ground. He was actually worried it would tip over right in front of the television camera. During the Apollo 11 ascent, his fears sort of came true. As the Eagle's ascent engine ignited, the exhaust blast knocked the flag over. Aldrin reported seeing it lying in the dust as they lifted off.
Why the photos look different across missions
Every mission had its own vibe.
- Apollo 12: Pete Conrad and Alan Bean had a hell of a time with their flag. The latch meant to hold the crossbar at a 90-degree angle failed. Their flag ended up drooping at an awkward angle.
- Apollo 14: This one was arguably the most stable, though the "waving" effect was still present because of the telescopic arm's design.
- Apollo 15, 16, and 17: By this point, the astronauts were pros. They knew how to work the hardware, but the "crinkled" look was now a tradition.
The lighting is another factor people get hung up on. Because there is no atmosphere to scatter light, shadows on the Moon are incredibly "harsh" and black. This high contrast makes the folds in the flag look much deeper and more three-dimensional than they would on Earth. It tricks the eye into thinking there is motion where there is only static, crinkled nylon.
Is there anything left of the flags today?
This is where it gets a bit depressing. If you were to take a photo flag on moon today, you wouldn't see the Red, White, and Blue. You’d see a white sheet.
The Moon is bombarded by unfiltered ultraviolet radiation. On Earth, our atmosphere protects us and our fabrics. On the lunar surface, that $5.50 nylon has been "bleached" for over fifty years. Combined with the extreme temperature swings—ranging from 240 degrees Fahrenheit in the sun to minus 280 degrees in the dark—the fabric has almost certainly become brittle.
LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) images from 2012 actually confirmed that the flags from Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 are still standing. You can see the shadows they cast on the ground as the sun moves. The Apollo 11 flag, as Aldrin suspected, is nowhere to be seen, likely buried under lunar dust or disintegrated by the exhaust of the departing spacecraft.
📖 Related: Doom on the MacBook Touch Bar: Why We Keep Porting 90s Games to Tiny OLED Strips
What most people get wrong about the shadows
Shadows are the "smoking gun" for many skeptics, but they actually prove the authenticity of the photos. In many of the flag shots, the shadows of the astronauts and the flag don't seem parallel. People claim this proves there were multiple studio lights.
It’s actually just basic geometry on uneven terrain.
If you take a photo on a bumpy, sloped surface with a single light source (the Sun), the shadows will appear to bend and diverge based on the topography. It's the same reason a shadow looks "broken" when it hits a curb on a sidewalk. Furthermore, the lunar surface itself is highly reflective—a phenomenon called regolith "backscatter." This secondary light source fills in the shadows, making the flag visible even on its "dark" side.
Technical specs of the Lunar Flag Assembly (LFA)
The whole setup was surprisingly flimsy. The vertical pole was an inch in diameter, made of anodized aluminum. It was designed to be as light as possible because every ounce of weight cost a fortune in fuel. The horizontal bar was held in place by a simple gold-colored pull-pin. If that pin didn't release, the flag didn't fly.
It was a miracle of "just enough" engineering.
The astronauts had to practice deploying the flag while wearing their bulky pressurized suits. If you've ever tried to assemble IKEA furniture while wearing oven mitts, you have a rough idea of what Armstrong was dealing with. This physical struggle is why the pole is often tilted in the photo flag on moon—getting it perfectly vertical was the least of their worries.
How to spot a real lunar photo vs a fake
If you're looking at space photography, check the "crosshairs." These are called Réseau plate marks. They were etched into the glass of the Hasselblad cameras used by the astronauts. In a real photo, the image is captured behind these marks.
👉 See also: I Forgot My iPhone Passcode: How to Unlock iPhone Screen Lock Without Losing Your Mind
Sometimes, in poor-quality scans, the crosshairs seem to disappear behind objects, leading to "faked" claims. In reality, it’s just "bleeding" or overexposure where the bright white of an astronaut's suit or a bright flag "washes out" the thin black line of the crosshair.
Nuance matters.
The flags are a testament to human ego, sure, but also to human ingenuity. We didn't just go there; we wanted to make sure everyone knew we were there. The "waving" flag isn't a mistake—it's a frozen moment of mechanical friction and the lack of air.
Actionable insights for space history enthusiasts
If you want to see the flags for yourself, you can't do it with a backyard telescope. Not even the Hubble Space Telescope has the resolution to see a three-foot flag on the Moon's surface. It would appear as a fraction of a single pixel.
Instead, your best bet is to dive into the LROC (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera) Quickmap. This is a free, public tool provided by Arizona State University. You can zoom in on the Apollo landing sites and see the actual footprints (disturbed soil) and the shadows of the flagpoles that still remain.
- Look for the "halo": Around the descent stages of the Lunar Modules, the ground is lighter. This is where the rocket engines "scoured" the dust away.
- Track the shadows: Use the time-slider on the LROC site to see the shadows of the flags grow and shrink. It's the definitive proof that these objects are still standing vertically.
- Study the raw files: Avoid "remastered" photos on social media which often use AI to smooth out grain. Go to the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal hosted by NASA. These are the raw, high-resolution scans that show the actual texture of the nylon and the mechanical snags in the crossbars.
Understanding the "why" behind the ripple doesn't take away the magic; it actually highlights how difficult it was to take a simple photograph in an environment that wants to destroy everything we build.