Why the Animal Crackers 2017 film Almost Never Made It to Your Screen

Why the Animal Crackers 2017 film Almost Never Made It to Your Screen

Animation is a brutal business. Most people think you just draw some characters, hire a few famous voices, and boom—you’ve got a hit. It doesn't work that way. The animal crackers 2017 film is the perfect, messy example of how a great idea can get trapped in "distribution hell" for years while the creators just watch from the sidelines, hoping someone throws them a lifeline.

It's a weird story. Honestly, the movie has everything you’d want in a family flick. Magic cookies? Check. A circus setting? Check. A voice cast that includes Danny DeVito, Emily Blunt, and John Krasinski? Absolutely. Yet, if you lived in the United States, you couldn't even watch the thing until 2020. That's a three-year gap between its premiere at the Annecy International Animated Film Festival and its actual release on Netflix.

Why? Because the film industry is sometimes more about paperwork than art.

The Long, Strange Trip of the Animal Crackers 2017 Film

Scott Christian Sava, the creator, basically bet everything on this. He co-directed it with Tony Bancroft—the guy who directed Mulan, so we’re talking real pedigree here. The premise is simple but kind of genius: Owen Huntington inherits a circus and a box of magical animal crackers. If you eat a bear cracker, you turn into a bear. Eat a hamster? You're a hamster. To turn back into a human, you have to eat the little broken "human" cookie at the bottom of the box.

It's whimsical. It’s also a little dark if you think about it too hard, but that’s the charm.

The production wasn't the problem. The movie looked great. Blue Dream Studios did a solid job with the CG. The real headache started when it came time to actually put it in theaters. Relativity Media was supposed to handle it, but they went through a high-profile bankruptcy. Then other distributors like Serafini Releasing and Entertainment Studios circled it, but deals kept falling through. It was basically the "orphan" of the animation world for a minute there.

Sava was incredibly transparent about the whole ordeal. He would post updates on social media, basically telling fans, "Look, I'm trying." It wasn't some corporate PR machine; it was a guy who made a movie about his favorite childhood snack and just wanted people to see it.

🔗 Read more: A Simple Favor Blake Lively: Why Emily Nelson Is Still the Ultimate Screen Mystery

A Voice Cast That Shouldn't Have Been Possible

When you look at the credits for the animal crackers 2017 film, it feels like a fever dream of A-list talent. Usually, indie animated films struggle to get one big name. This movie got everyone.

Ian McKellen plays the villain, Horatio P. Huntington. He brings that Shakespearean gravity to a character who is, quite literally, obsessed with snacks. Then you have Sylvester Stallone as Bulletman. Yes, Rocky is a human cannonball.

  • John Krasinski and Emily Blunt: They play the leads, Owen and Zoe. This was actually before A Quiet Place, so seeing them work together here is a fun bit of trivia.
  • Danny DeVito: He plays Cheyenne, the clown. It’s classic DeVito—loud, raspy, and weirdly endearing.
  • Raven-Symoné and Gilbert Gottfried: Adding that extra layer of 90s/2000s nostalgia.

Having a cast this expensive usually means a studio is backing you with a $100 million marketing budget. But this was an independent production. The fact that these actors signed on speaks to the strength of the script and Sava’s persistence. They weren't just there for a paycheck; they liked the quirkiness of the project.

Why the Animation Matters

We live in a world where Pixar and DreamWorks set the bar. If you aren't at that level of visual fidelity, people notice. The animal crackers 2017 film manages to punch above its weight class.

The character designs are expressive. There’s a specific "squash and stretch" quality to the transformations that feels like old-school Looney Tunes. When Owen turns into a giant blue whale in the middle of a circus ring, the scale feels real. It’s not just "good for an indie movie." It’s just good.

But it’s the music that really catches you off guard. Bear McCreary did the score. If that name sounds familiar, it’s because he’s the genius behind the music in God of War and The Walking Dead. He gave this circus movie a sound that feels grand and cinematic. There's even an original song by Huey Lewis. It’s a total vibe.

💡 You might also like: The A Wrinkle in Time Cast: Why This Massive Star Power Didn't Save the Movie

The Netflix Save

By the time 2020 rolled around, most people had forgotten about the "animal cracker movie" that was teased years earlier. Then Netflix stepped in.

The streaming giant has a habit of picking up "stuck" projects and giving them a global platform. It was a win-win. Netflix needed family content during the pandemic, and Sava finally got his movie to the public. It debuted in the Top 10 in dozens of countries.

It’s kind of ironic. A movie that couldn't find a single theater to take it ended up being watched by millions of people in their living rooms. It proves that the "traditional" way of releasing films is becoming a dinosaur. If the animal crackers 2017 film had come out in theaters in 2017 as planned, it might have been buried by a Disney blockbuster. On Netflix, it found its own space.

Common Misconceptions About the Movie

People often get confused about where this movie came from. Because it’s on Netflix, a lot of users assume it’s a "Netflix Original." It isn't. Netflix just bought the distribution rights.

Another weird thing? The title. People often mix it up with other circus-themed movies like Madagascar 3 or The Greatest Showman. But this one is based specifically on a graphic novel by Scott Christian Sava. It’s a personal story. He actually came up with the idea while eating animal crackers with his kids.

There's also the "China factor." A lot of the funding came from Chinese investors (Beijing Wen Hua Dong Run Investment Co.), which is why the movie actually saw a release in China long before it hit the West. It made about $14 million there in 2018. This international co-production model is becoming the standard for big-budget indie animation, but it also makes the legal rights a nightmare to untangle. That’s a big part of why the US release was delayed.

📖 Related: Cuba Gooding Jr OJ: Why the Performance Everyone Hated Was Actually Genius

What We Can Learn From the Animal Crackers Saga

If you’re a creator, this story is both terrifying and inspiring. It’s terrifying because it shows that you can do everything right—hire great actors, make a beautiful film—and still get stuck in a legal loophole for years.

But it’s inspiring because it actually came out. It didn't end up in a vault.

The animal crackers 2017 film is a lesson in grit. Sava didn't give up. He didn't let the bankruptcy of a distributor kill his dream. He kept showing up at festivals. He kept talking to streamers.

Actionable Insights for Fans and Creators

If you haven't seen the movie yet, go into it expecting a classic Saturday morning cartoon feel but with high-end production values. It’s a great "double feature" pairing with something like The Willoughbys or Klaus.

For those interested in the "behind the scenes" struggle:

  1. Research the "Distribution Hell" phenomenon. Look at films like The Thief and the Cobbler to see how common this actually is in animation.
  2. Follow the creators. Scott Christian Sava is still very active and often shares the "real" side of the industry that most studios try to hide.
  3. Support indie animation. When you see a non-Disney/DreamWorks film on a streaming Top 10 list, watch it. High viewership numbers tell platforms that we want more than just sequels and reboots.
  4. Check out the graphic novel. If you liked the world-building, the original book by Sava offers a slightly different take on the lore of the magic cookies.

The animal crackers 2017 film isn't just a movie about magical snacks. It’s a survivor. In an industry that usually chews up and spits out independent voices, this one managed to land on its feet—even if it took three years longer than expected. It stands as a reminder that sometimes, the human "cookie" at the bottom of the box is just as important as the magic ones at the top.