Why the After the Rain 1999 Movie is the Masterpiece Akira Kurosawa Never Got to Direct

Why the After the Rain 1999 Movie is the Masterpiece Akira Kurosawa Never Got to Direct

If you’ve ever sat through a modern blockbuster and felt like your brain was being slowly turned into lukewarm porridge by CGI explosions, you need to watch the After the Rain 1999 movie. It’s basically a cinematic deep breath. It’s quiet. It’s humble. And honestly, it’s one of the most heartbreakingly beautiful hand-offs in film history.

Originally titled Ame agaru, this isn't just another samurai flick where guys in topknots scream and swing katanas for two hours. It’s actually the final screenplay written by the legendary Akira Kurosawa. He died before he could film it, so his long-time assistant director and protégé, Takashi Koizumi, took the reins. You can feel Kurosawa’s ghost in every frame, but Koizumi brings a softness that’s entirely his own. It’s a movie about being a "good" person in a world that usually rewards being a "successful" one.

The Ronin Who Was Just Too Nice

The story follows Ihei Misawa, played by Akira Terao. Misawa is a master swordsman. He’s fast. He’s precise. He could probably take down an entire room of bandits without breaking a sweat. But there’s a catch: he’s a "ronin," a masterless samurai, and he’s perpetually unemployed because he’s just too kind-hearted for his own good.

He and his wife, Tayo (played by the incredible Yoshiko Miyazaki), are stuck at a small country inn. Why? Because the river has flooded. The rain won't stop. They’re basically trapped with a bunch of poor, grumpy travelers who are starting to lose their minds from boredom and hunger.

Most samurai movies would have the hero sitting in a corner looking moody and stoic. Not Misawa. He decides to cheer everyone up by organizing a feast. But he has no money. So, he does the one thing a "noble" samurai is never supposed to do: he goes to local dojos and bets on sword fights for cash.

It’s called "prize-fighting," and in the Edo period, it was considered a huge disgrace. Misawa doesn't care. He’d rather lose his dignity than see a group of strangers go hungry. That’s the core of the After the Rain 1999 movie. It asks a really uncomfortable question: Is it better to follow the rules and be a "great" man, or break them to be a "good" one?

🔗 Read more: Love Island UK Who Is Still Together: The Reality of Romance After the Villa

A Different Kind of Samurai Aesthetic

Visually, this movie is a total 180 from the high-contrast, kinetic energy of Seven Samurai or Yojimbo. It’s lush. The colors are dampened by the constant mist and drizzle. When the sun finally breaks through—which, spoiler alert, is where the title comes from—it feels like a physical relief.

Koizumi uses a lot of Kurosawa's old crew. The lighting has that classical, painterly quality where every shadow feels intentional. But the pacing is different. It’s slow. Not "boring" slow, but "sit down and have a cup of tea" slow. You’re forced to live in the damp inn with these characters. You feel the humidity. You smell the wet wood.

What People Get Wrong About Misawa

A lot of critics at the time looked at Ihei Misawa and thought he was weak. They saw his constant smiling and his apologies as a lack of "bushido" spirit. That’s missing the point entirely.

Misawa’s strength is internal. There’s a scene where he’s scouted by a local Lord, Shigeaki (played by Tatsuya Nakadai, a Kurosawa veteran). The Lord is fascinated by him. He sees Misawa’s skill and wants to make him his master of arms. But the court politics start swirling. The other high-ranking officials look down on Misawa because of his "shameful" prize-fighting.

The tragedy isn't that Misawa fails; it's that the world isn't built for men like him. He’s a victim of a rigid class system that values appearance over actual virtue. Honestly, it’s a theme that feels more relevant in 2026 than it did in 1999. We’re still obsessed with "status" over "character."

💡 You might also like: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch

The Kurosawa Connection

You can’t talk about the After the Rain 1999 movie without talking about the "Emperor" himself. Akira Kurosawa spent years meticulously planning this. He drew storyboards. He obsessed over the dialogue. He wanted this to be his "sunnier" follow-up to the dark, cynical vibes of his later career.

  • The Script: It’s based on a short story by Shugoro Yamamoto. Kurosawa loved Yamamoto (he also adapted Sanjuro and Red Beard from his work).
  • The Direction: Takashi Koizumi doesn't try to mimic Kurosawa's aggressive editing. He keeps the camera still. He lets the actors breathe.
  • The Music: The score by Masaru Sato is haunting. It’s subtle and doesn't tell you how to feel, which is a rarity these days.

There’s a specific nuance here regarding "The Way of the Sword." In most movies, the sword is a tool for killing. In After the Rain, Misawa views it as a burden. He’s so good at it that it actually hinders his ability to live a normal life. It’s a paradox. He wants to be a simple man, but he’s cursed with the talent of a god-tier warrior.

Why You Should Care Today

Usually, when we look back at late-90s Japanese cinema, we talk about Princess Mononoke or the rise of J-Horror like Ringu. The After the Rain 1999 movie often gets lost in the shuffle because it’s so quiet. It doesn't demand your attention; it earns it.

It won the Japan Academy Prize for Best Picture, and for good reason. It’s a film that doesn't have a villain. The "antagonist" is just human pride and social convention. That makes the stakes feel much more personal. When Misawa loses a job opportunity because he was "too nice" to a bunch of peasants, it hurts way more than a choreographed sword fight ever could.

The relationship between Misawa and his wife is also the secret MVP of the film. Most samurai wives in movies are just there to look worried in the background. Tayo is Ihei’s moral compass. She understands his struggle better than he does. Their bond is the emotional anchor that keeps the movie from drifting into "too-sweet" territory.

📖 Related: Why ASAP Rocky F kin Problems Still Runs the Club Over a Decade Later

How to Watch and What to Look For

If you’re going to hunt this down, look for the high-definition restorations. The texture of the rain and the grain of the wooden floors are half the experience.

When you watch, pay attention to the "empty" moments. There are long stretches where nothing "happens." Misawa might just be looking at the river. Or the travelers are joking around. In these moments, the movie is telling you that life isn't lived in the big battles; it's lived in the waiting. It’s lived in the "after the rain" moments.

Don't go in expecting John Wick with a kimono. Go in expecting a meditation on what it means to be human. It’s a film that leaves you feeling a bit better about the world, which is a pretty rare feat for a period piece about unemployed warriors.

Actionable Takeaways for Cinephiles

  • Check the Lineage: If you enjoy this, look into Takashi Koizumi’s other work like When the Last Sword is Drawn. He carries the Kurosawa torch better than anyone.
  • Context Matters: Read up on the Edo period’s "Sankin-kotai" system. It explains why all these people were traveling and stuck at inns in the first place. It adds a layer of historical weight to their desperation.
  • Compare and Contrast: Watch Yojimbo and then watch After the Rain. It’s fascinating to see how the same screenwriter (Kurosawa) viewed the concept of a "ronin" at the beginning and the end of his life. He went from seeing them as cool, cynical badasses to seeing them as vulnerable, empathetic humans.

The After the Rain 1999 movie is a gentle reminder that even when the weather is at its worst, the sun eventually has to come out. It’s not just a movie; it’s a vibe. It’s a lesson in humility that we probably all need to hear right now.

If you’re looking to round out your knowledge of Japanese cinema beyond the usual "Top 10" lists, this is your starting point. It bridges the gap between the golden age of the 1950s and the modern era perfectly. No flashy tricks, no cynical twists—just a really good story about a really good man.