It happened at 1:23:45 AM. April 26, 1986. Most of the world was asleep, and honestly, even the people working at the Vladimir Ilyich Lenin Nuclear Power Plant didn't realize the world had just changed forever. You’ve probably gone down a YouTube rabbit hole looking for a real video of chernobyl explosion capturing the exact moment Reactor 4 blew its lid. We’re used to modern life where every car crash or lightning strike is caught on a Ring camera or a smartphone. But 1986 was different.
The truth? There is no footage of the blast. Not a single frame.
If you see a video online claiming to be the live recording of the explosion, it’s fake. Or, more accurately, it’s a recreation. It might be a clip from the 2019 HBO miniseries, which was so well-done it fooled half the internet. It might be a grainy shot from a documentary made years later using CGI. But at the moment of the disaster, no one was standing around with a shoulder-mounted Betacam pointed at the ventilation stack. It was the middle of the night in a restricted Soviet industrial zone.
The first real footage wasn't filmed until hours later
The earliest visual record we actually have of the disaster didn't come until the sun came up. Even then, it wasn't a news crew. It was Igor Kostin. He was a photographer for Novosti Press Agency. He flew over the site in a helicopter a few hours after the explosion. His camera actually started failing because the radiation levels were so high. The film came out grainy, degraded, and filled with "sparkles" that weren't a glitch—they were literally the result of radioactive particles hitting the film stock.
Think about that. The radiation was so intense it was "photographing" itself onto the film.
Most people searching for a video of chernobyl explosion are actually looking for the "Elephant's Foot" footage or the clips of "liquidators" shoveling graphite off the roof. Those videos exist. They are terrifying. They show men in lead aprons running out into a high-rad zone for 90 seconds at a time because that’s all their bodies could handle before the dose became lethal. But the explosion itself? That remains a dark gap in the visual record of the 20th century.
What actually happened inside Reactor 4?
To understand why there’s no video, you have to understand the sheer speed of the event. This wasn't a slow burn. It was a steam explosion followed by a second, more powerful explosion—likely hydrogen or a nuclear excursion, though physicists still debate the exact nature of the second "thump."
💡 You might also like: Brian Walshe Trial Date: What Really Happened with the Verdict
The 1,000-ton upper biological shield, nicknamed "Elena," was tossed into the air like a coin. It landed sideways, opening the core to the atmosphere.
The guys in Control Room 4, like Akimov and Toptunov, didn't even see it. They felt the shockwaves. They heard the thud. They saw the control rods get stuck. But there were no windows. The first person to really "see" the damage from the outside was a night shift worker named Palamarchuk, who stepped outside and saw the sky glowing. He described it as a shimmering blue light—Cherenkov radiation—caused by the ionization of the air. It’s a beautiful, haunting image that no camera caught.
Why the HBO footage gets confused for reality
The 2019 Chernobyl series did such a terrifyingly good job of recreating the "look" of the 80s that clips of the explosion from the show are constantly uploaded to TikTok and YouTube as "rare archival footage."
If you see a video of chernobyl explosion where the camera is perfectly steady, the colors are cinematic, and the sound is a crisp, cinematic boom, it’s fiction.
Real Soviet film from 1986 was grainy. It was shot on 16mm or 35mm. It had a specific "jitter." More importantly, the sound wouldn't have been captured clearly from a distance. The real archival videos we do have—the ones showing the Mi-8 helicopters dropping sand and boron into the fire—are silent or have a muffled, low-quality hum of the engine.
The footage that does exist is arguably scarier
While we lack the "money shot" of the building blowing up, the archival tapes that surfaced after the fall of the Soviet Union are haunting. There is a specific video shot from a helicopter where you can see the red glow of the exposed core. The camera shakes. The pilot is breathing heavily. You can hear the clicking of Geiger counters in the background of some recordings.
📖 Related: How Old is CHRR? What People Get Wrong About the Ohio State Research Giant
Vladimir Shevchenko was a filmmaker who captured some of the most famous footage of the cleanup. He died shortly after from radiation sickness. His camera was so radioactive that it had to be buried in a lead-lined casket.
This is the reality of the video of chernobyl explosion search: the closer you got to the truth with a camera, the more the camera (and the person holding it) was destroyed.
Key differences between fake and real archival clips
If you’re trying to verify a clip, look for these markers.
Real footage:
- Vertical white streaks or "noise" that looks like static (this is often radiation damage to the film).
- Muted, washed-out colors—mostly grays, browns, and dull greens.
- A lack of dramatic music. Real Soviet archival footage is usually raw or has a very dry Russian narration added later.
- Extreme graininess.
Fake/Recreation footage:
- High-definition 16:9 aspect ratio.
- Perfectly timed "jumpscares" or dramatic camera shakes that feel choreographed.
- Sound effects that mimic a modern action movie.
The science of why the film looks "weird"
Basically, when gamma rays hit photographic film, they behave a lot like light. They "expose" the silver halide crystals in the film emulsion. This creates those tiny white dots or fogging. In the famous footage of the liquidators on the roof (the Masha zone), you can see the bottom of the frame is often fogged out. That’s because the radiation was coming from the roof itself, through the bottom of the camera.
👉 See also: The Yogurt Shop Murders Location: What Actually Stands There Today
It’s a literal thumbprint of the disaster.
We often want to see the explosion because we want to witness the moment of "the mistake." We want to see the exact second Dyatlov’s experiment went wrong. But the real horror isn't in the blast. The real horror is in the footage of the Pripyat children playing in the "snow" (which was actually radioactive ash) the next morning, or the footage of the empty ferris wheel that never carried a single passenger.
Where to find the most authentic footage
If you want the real deal, skip the "scary mystery" channels. Look for documentaries like The Battle of Chernobyl (2006). It uses the actual Igor Kostin photos and the Shevchenko film. It doesn't rely on CGI to tell the story. You see the faces of the soldiers who were sent in with nothing but handmade lead suits. You see the dogs being culled in the streets of Pripyat. You see the sarcophagus being built.
That footage is plenty. You don't need a video of chernobyl explosion to feel the weight of what happened there. The aftermath is recorded in agonizing detail.
Actionable steps for history buffs and researchers
If you are researching this, don't just trust a video title.
- Check the source: Look for the "State Archive of the Russian Federation" or "Ukrainian National Chernobyl Museum" watermarks.
- Verify the date: The explosion was April 26. Any footage showing the fire from the ground was likely taken by the internal fire brigade (the Kibenok and Pravik teams) or the plant’s own photographers in the days following, not the night of.
- Cross-reference with the Legasov Tapes: Listen to the audio recordings left behind by Valery Legasov. While they aren't video, they provide the "script" for what you are seeing in the archival clips.
- Study the physics: Understanding the RBMK reactor design helps you realize that the explosion was largely internal before it breached the roof, meaning even if a camera had been there, it might have just looked like a building suddenly expanding and venting steam.
The search for the "lost" video of the explosion is a bit of a ghost hunt. We want to see the "why" in 4K, but history isn't always that convenient. Sometimes the most important moments happen in the dark, and all we're left with are the grainy, radioactive shadows of the day after.