You’ve seen it a thousand times. A commercial flashes on the screen, a dentist in a crisp white coat looks into the camera, and the narrator tells you that 4 out of 5 dentists recommend a specific brand of sugar-free gum. It sounds authoritative. It sounds like a consensus. It sounds like science.
But honestly? It’s a masterclass in psychological framing.
When we hear 4 out of 5, our brains do something funny. We don't think about the one outlier who disagreed. We focus on the overwhelming 80%. It’s a statistic that has defined the Trident brand for decades, specifically their sugarless gum campaign that launched in the 1960s. But if you dig into how that number was actually generated, you realize it wasn't a room of five guys in lab coats arguing over peppermint vs. spearmint.
It was a survey. A very specific survey.
The survey that birthed a legend
The American Chicle Company—the original makers of Trident—didn’t just pull this number out of thin air. They actually surveyed dentists. However, the question wasn't "What is the best gum on earth?" Instead, they asked dentists a much more narrow question: If your patients already chew gum, would you recommend they chew sugared gum or sugarless gum?
Unsurprisingly, almost every dentist said sugarless.
Because sugar causes cavities. It's that simple. If a patient is determined to chew gum, a dentist is never going to suggest they go for the one loaded with sucrose. By framing the results as 4 out of 5, the brand managed to make a common-sense medical preference look like a specific endorsement of their product. It’s brilliant. It’s also kinda cheeky.
Think about the math for a second. If you have 1,000 dentists and 800 say "sugarless is better," you have your stat. But what about the other 200? Some might have said people shouldn't chew gum at all. Others might have been indifferent. By focusing on the 80%, the brand created a "social proof" loop that stuck in the public consciousness for over half a century.
✨ Don't miss: Syrian Dinar to Dollar: Why Everyone Gets the Name (and the Rate) Wrong
Why 80% feels more real than 100%
There is a specific reason why marketers love 4 out of 5 instead of saying "Everyone loves us!"
Perfection is suspicious.
If a company claims that 100% of experts agree on something, our "scam sensors" start tingling. We know the world is messy. We know people are contrarian. By leaving that 20% margin of error—that lonely fifth dentist—the claim feels grounded in reality. It suggests there was a real study with real, varying opinions.
In the world of advertising, this is known as the "blemishing effect." A small piece of negative or neutral information can actually increase the persuasiveness of a positive message. It makes the source seem more honest. When Trident used this, they weren't just selling gum; they were selling the idea of professional validation that felt "honest enough" to believe.
The legal battles over numbers
You can't just throw numbers around without consequences. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is famously prickly about "expert" endorsements. If you say 4 out of 5, you better have the paperwork to back it up.
In the 1990s and 2000s, there were several challenges to these types of claims. For instance, Sensodyne and Colagte have both faced scrutiny over how they tally their professional recommendations. Often, these companies send out surveys to thousands of dentists. The dentists might be allowed to pick multiple brands they like.
If a dentist says, "Yeah, I recommend Colgate, Crest, and Sensodyne," then all three companies can technically claim that dentist "recommends" their brand.
🔗 Read more: New Zealand currency to AUD: Why the exchange rate is shifting in 2026
This is how you get multiple competing brands all claiming to be the "#1 recommended brand." They aren't necessarily lying, but they are slicing the data in a way that favors their specific marketing narrative. It's a game of semantics. The "recommendation" isn't an exclusive marriage; it's more like a "sure, that's fine" shrug from a professional.
Why we still fall for it in 2026
We live in an era of data overload. Paradoxically, this makes us more susceptible to simple ratios like 4 out of 5. We don't have the "cognitive bandwidth" to read a 40-page white paper on the efficacy of xylitol. We want a shortcut.
Ratios provide that shortcut. They are easy to visualize. You can see five people in your head. You can see four of them nodding. That visual sticks better than "80% of 1,200 respondents."
The psychological weight of the "outgroup" (the 5th person) also creates a weird sense of curiosity. We’ve all seen the memes: What did that 5th dentist know that the others didn't? That little bit of friction makes the ad more memorable. It turns a boring stat into a tiny story.
The actual science of chewing gum
Let’s step away from the marketing and look at the actual health side. Is sugar-free gum actually good for you?
Most dentists—probably more than 4 out of 5—agree that chewing sugar-free gum increases saliva flow. This is the real benefit. Saliva neutralizes plaque acid and washes away food particles. According to the American Dental Association (ADA), chewing sugarless gum for 20 minutes after eating can help prevent tooth decay.
So the claim isn't wrong. It's just that the brand took a general medical truth and "branded" it.
💡 You might also like: How Much Do Chick fil A Operators Make: What Most People Get Wrong
It’s like a water company saying "4 out of 5 doctors recommend drinking our water instead of bleach." Technically true. Hilariously biased in its framing.
Lessons from the 80/20 rule of persuasion
If you're looking at this from a business or content perspective, the 4 out of 5 phenomenon teaches us a few things about how to communicate.
First, specificity beats generalizations. "Most dentists" is weak. "4 out of 5" is a mental image.
Second, the power of the "Expert Filter." We trust people with titles. Even if the "expert" is an anonymous group in a survey, the mere mention of a professional class (dentists, dermatologists, engineers) shifts the conversation from "we want your money" to "we have a solution."
Third, the "lonely dissenter" adds credibility. Don't be afraid to show that your product or idea isn't for everyone. It makes the people it is for trust you more.
Actionable insights for the savvy consumer
Next time you see a statistic like 4 out of 5, don't just swallow it. Here is how to actually evaluate those claims:
- Check the denominator. Was the survey conducted on five people or 5,000? A small sample size is statistically insignificant and usually a red flag.
- Look for the "Compared to what?" If the survey asks "Is this better than nothing?" or "Is this better than a bad alternative?", the result is biased from the start.
- Search for the asterisk. There is almost always a tiny font at the bottom of the screen or the back of the package. That's where the truth lives. It will tell you the sample size, the year the study was done, and who paid for it.
- Understand the "Multiple Choice" loophole. Realize that an expert "recommending" a brand often just means they listed it as one of many acceptable options, not that it is their absolute favorite.
The 4 out of 5 trope isn't going anywhere. It's too baked into our culture. But once you see the strings behind the puppet, the magic trick doesn't work quite as well. You realize that while the gum might be sugar-free, the marketing is definitely sweet.
To apply this knowledge, start by auditing the "social proof" you use in your own life—whether you're writing a resume, selling a product, or just trying to win an argument. Use specific ratios. Acknowledge the minority view. It builds a level of trust that "100% perfection" never could.
Stay skeptical of clean numbers. The world is usually more like 3.7 out of 5, but that doesn't make for a very good jingle.