Why the 1966 How the Grinch Stole Christmas Movie Still Beats Every Remake

Why the 1966 How the Grinch Stole Christmas Movie Still Beats Every Remake

Twenty-six minutes. That’s all it took for Chuck Jones and Theodor Geisel to change Christmas forever. It’s actually kinda wild when you think about it because most modern holiday specials feel like they’re dragging on for hours, but the 1966 How the Grinch Stole Christmas movie manages to pack more soul, better music, and more iconic animation into a half-hour than most billion-dollar franchises manage in a trilogy.

Most people don't realize how close this thing came to never happening. Dr. Seuss (Ted Geisel) was famously anti-Hollywood. He’d had a rough go with a live-action project called The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T back in the 50s and basically told Tinseltown to kick rocks. But Chuck Jones, the mastermind behind Bugs Bunny and Wile E. Coyote, was persistent. He convinced Geisel that they could capture the "pen-and-ink" feel of the book without ruining the message. They ended up creating something that didn't just adapt the book—it improved it.

The Weird Alchemy of Karloff and Jones

If you look at the original book, the Grinch is actually a bit more of a spindly, black-and-white creature. He’s mean, sure, but he lacks that specific, oily charisma we see in the 1966 How the Grinch Stole Christmas movie. Chuck Jones decided the Grinch needed to be green. Why? Because every rental car Jones drove in the mid-60s was that exact, hideous shade of "ugly green." It stuck.

Then you have Boris Karloff.

Karloff was the King of Horror, the man who played Frankenstein’s monster. Choosing him to voice a children’s holiday special was a massive gamble that paid off because of the texture of his voice. He sounds like ancient parchment and cold tea. He brings a gravitas to the narration that makes the Whos’ optimism feel earned rather than just sugary. Interestingly, Karloff didn't sing. A lot of people still think he did, but that iconic, bass-heavy "You're a Mean One, Mr. Grinch" was actually performed by Thurl Ravenscroft.

Ravenscroft was the voice of Tony the Tiger ("They're G-r-r-reat!"), but because he wasn't credited in the closing titles, Karloff gets the credit for the song to this day. It’s one of those classic Hollywood injustices. Ravenscroft’s voice is so deep it feels like it’s vibrating in your floorboards. Without that specific vocal contrast—Karloff’s raspy storytelling and Ravenscroft’s booming, insults-as-lyrics song—the special would probably just be another forgotten cartoon.

👉 See also: The Real Story Behind I Can Do Bad All by Myself: From Stage to Screen

Why the Animation Style Matters More Than CGI

We’ve seen the Jim Carrey version. We’ve seen the 2018 Illumination version with Benedict Cumberbatch. They’re fine. They’re flashy. But they lack the "smear" and the "stretch."

Chuck Jones brought his Looney Tunes sensibilities to Whoville. Look at the way the Grinch slinks around. When he steals the first tree, he doesn't just walk; he pours himself across the floor like a green liquid. That’s hand-drawn brilliance. You can see the individual line work. It feels human. In an era where everything is rendered in a computer to look "perfect," the slight imperfections of 1960s cel animation give the 1966 How the Grinch Stole Christmas movie a tactile warmth.

The Problem with Padding

One of the biggest issues with modern adaptations of Dr. Seuss is that the books are short. To make a 90-minute feature film, writers have to invent backstories. We get scenes of the Grinch being bullied in school or having a tragic childhood. Honestly? We don't need it.

The 1966 special respects the mystery. The Grinch’s heart is two sizes too small. That’s it. That’s the explanation. By keeping the runtime tight, the 1966 version maintains a frantic, joyful pace. There is no "B-plot" about a Who girl trying to find the meaning of Christmas through a subplot about her overworked mom. It’s just a heist movie where the thief realizes he’s stealing the wrong thing.

The "Mean One" Lyrics as High Art

Theodor Geisel wrote the lyrics himself, and they are genuinely some of the most creative insults ever put to paper. Calling someone a "nasty, wasty skunk" is one thing, but saying their heart is "full of unwashed socks" or that they have "garlic in their soul"? That’s poetic.

✨ Don't miss: Love Island UK Who Is Still Together: The Reality of Romance After the Villa

Albert Hague, the composer, had to figure out how to make these bizarre lyrics sound like a legitimate song. He succeeded so well that the soundtrack is a staple of Christmas radio sixty years later. Most people forget that the Whos' song, "Welcome Christmas" (the Fah who foraze one), isn't even in real language. Geisel made up "Seuss-latin" to make it sound like an ancient, traditional hymn. It gives the Whos a sense of culture and history that makes their forgiveness of the Grinch feel more profound. They aren't just mindless consumers; they’re a community with deep-rooted traditions that don't depend on stuff.

Surprising Facts You Probably Missed

Even if you’ve seen it every year since you were five, there are things you probably missed. For example:

  • The Red Suit: The Grinch’s Santa suit wasn't originally supposed to be that vibrant. The production had a relatively high budget for the time—about $315,000, which was four times the cost of an average half-hour animation—so they could afford the rich reds and deep greens that pop on screen.
  • Max the Dog: Max is the unsung hero. Chuck Jones admitted that Max represented the audience. He’s the innocent bystander who knows what’s happening is wrong but is dragged along for the ride. His facial expressions are some of the best character acting in animation history.
  • The CBS Deal: The special was originally sponsored by the Foundation for Commercial Banks. It’s a bit ironic that a story about the evils of commercialism was paid for by a banking conglomerate, but that’s the 1960s for you.

The Lasting Legacy of the 1966 How the Grinch Stole Christmas Movie

There is a reason this specific version is preserved in the National Film Registry. It captures the "spirit" of the season without being preachy. It’s weird. It’s slightly dark. The Grinch is genuinely terrifying for a second when he smiles that wide, toothy grin that curls up into his eyes.

When people search for the 1966 How the Grinch Stole Christmas movie, they aren't just looking for nostalgia. They’re looking for the definitive version of the story. It’s the one where the Grinch doesn't have a complicated psychological profile. He’s just a guy who hates noise and eventually learns that people matter more than things.

The ending doesn't feel unearned. When the Grinch brings the sleigh back down the mountain and joins the Whos for their roast beast, it’s a moment of genuine connection. No jokes, no sarcastic quips—just a community growing by one.

🔗 Read more: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch


Next Steps for the Ultimate Viewing Experience

If you're planning your annual rewatch, don't just stream a compressed version on a random site. To truly appreciate the craft, look for the 4K remastered versions or the "Ultimate Edition" Blu-ray. The restoration work done on the original cels makes the colors look exactly as Chuck Jones intended—vibrant, slightly psychedelic, and deeply atmospheric.

Also, take ten minutes to read the original 1957 book side-by-side with the special. You’ll notice exactly where the animators added "business"—the little physical gags with Max and the sleigh—and how those additions actually enhance the rhythm of the story. If you're a fan of animation history, checking out the documentary Dr. Seuss and the Grinch: From Scripture to Screen provides a great look at the storyboards that bridged the gap between Geisel's sketches and the final film.

The best way to honor the legacy of this special is to watch it as it was intended: as a short, sharp, and soulful reminder that the best things in life can't be found in a store.