Why the 1 rep max conversion chart is often wrong and how to fix it

Why the 1 rep max conversion chart is often wrong and how to fix it

You're staring at the bar. It’s loaded with plates that look heavier than they did last week. Your goal is a new personal best, but your training program says you should be lifting a specific percentage of your maximum. How do you know if you can actually move it? Most people reach for a 1 rep max conversion chart and hope the math checks out.

But hope isn't a strategy.

Honestly, these charts are basically just "best guesses" dressed up in fancy math. They try to predict your absolute peak strength based on how many times you can lift a lighter weight. If you can bench 225 pounds for five reps, the chart tells you that you "should" be able to hit 260 for a single. Sometimes it works. Often, it doesn't.

The reality of strength training is much messier than a static grid of numbers on a gym wall. Your nervous system, your fiber type, and even how much sleep you got last night change the equation.

The math behind the 1 rep max conversion chart

Most of the charts you see in commercial gyms or on fitness apps are based on a few famous formulas. The big names here are Brzycki, Epley, and Lander.

Matt Brzycki developed his formula in the 1990s, and it’s arguably the most common one you’ll find. It looks like this:

$$Weight \div (1.0278 - (0.0278 \times Reps)) = 1RM$$

Then there’s the Epley formula, which is often favored by powerlifters because it tends to be a bit more aggressive. It suggests that your 1RM is $Weight \times (1 + (Reps / 30))$.

Do they work? Kind of.

If you are doing between three and eight reps, these formulas are surprisingly accurate for most people. However, once you start trying to predict a 1RM from a set of 15 reps, the math falls apart completely. At high rep ranges, you aren't testing pure strength anymore; you're testing muscular endurance and acid buffering capacity. A marathon runner might be able to do 20 reps of a weight that is 70% of their max, while an explosive sprinter might burn out at 10 reps with that same percentage.

Why your individual "engine" messes with the chart

We aren't robots. Your muscle fiber composition plays a massive role in whether a 1 rep max conversion chart actually applies to you.

Think about it this way. Some lifters are "fast-twitch dominant." They are incredibly explosive. They can move a mountain for one rep, but ask them to do five reps at 85% and they crumble. For these people, a standard conversion chart will consistently underestimate their true 1RM.

On the flip side, you have the "grinders." These are the lifters who can do 10 reps at a weight that is incredibly close to their max. Their drop-off curve is very shallow. If a grinder uses a standard Epley chart, they might find that the chart predicts a 1RM they have no prayer of actually hitting. The chart says they should be able to bench 300, but they get pinned by 285 every single time.

Then there’s the "specific lift" problem.

A conversion chart doesn't know the difference between a deadlift and an overhead press. Generally, people can perform more reps at a high percentage of their 1RM on lower-body movements than on upper-body movements. Your legs are built for volume. Your shoulders? Not so much. Using the same percentage-to-rep conversion for a squat and a side lateral raise is a recipe for a very frustrating workout.

🔗 Read more: Calories in Two Pieces of White Bread: What Most People Get Wrong

The fatigue factor

You also have to consider what experts like Dr. Mike Israetel or the coaches at Barbell Medicine call "the day-of" strength. Your theoretical 1RM might be 400 pounds, but if you stayed up late scrolling on your phone and skipped breakfast, your performance 1RM for that specific Tuesday might only be 375.

A static 1 rep max conversion chart can’t account for your life. It assumes you are a perfectly recovered specimen of human biology every time you step under the bar.

How to use these charts without getting hurt

Despite the flaws, these charts are actually useful tools if you treat them as a "rough map" rather than a GPS.

If you're starting a new program—let's say something like 5/3/1 or a Juggernaut AI block—you need a starting point. You shouldn't actually test your 1RM every month. It’s too taxing on the central nervous system. Instead, you perform a "rep max" test. You take a weight you know you can handle safely, do as many clean reps as possible (leaving maybe one in the tank), and then plug that into the 1 rep max conversion chart.

This gives you a "Training Max."

A Training Max is usually about 90% of what the chart says you can do. This creates a safety buffer. If the chart says your max is 200, you program your workouts based on a 180 max. This ensures that even on your worst days, you can still hit your required reps.

Real-world example: The 225 Bench Press

Let's look at a common milestone. You just hit 225 lbs for 6 reps on the bench press. You're feeling like a beast.

  1. Using Brzycki: $225 / (1.0278 - (0.0278 \times 6)) = 261 lbs$
  2. Using Epley: $225 \times (1 + (6 / 30)) = 270 lbs$

That is a 9-pound difference between two "proven" formulas. That might not seem like much, but in the world of 1RM attempts, 9 pounds is the difference between a clean lift and a torn pec or a crushed ego.

Better alternatives to the standard chart

If you want more accuracy, you should look into RPE (Rate of Perceived Exertion). This was popularized in the lifting world by Mike Tuchscherer of Reactive Training Systems.

Instead of just looking at a 1 rep max conversion chart, you look at how many "Reps in Reserve" (RIR) you had. If you did 5 reps but felt like you could have done 2 more, that's an RPE 8. Coaches have developed much more sophisticated charts that cross-reference reps performed with the RPE to give a "calculated 1RM" that changes every single set.

This is "Autoregulation."

It’s the evolution of the 1RM chart. It allows the numbers to breathe. If the bar is moving fast, your calculated 1RM goes up. If the bar is moving like it's stuck in molasses, the numbers scale back. This keeps you from hitting a wall.

Nuance in different populations

Age and training age matter here too.

Beginners often find that their 1 rep max conversion chart predictions are wildly inaccurate because their technique is inconsistent. A novice might be able to do 10 reps of a squat because they aren't yet skilled enough to truly push their nervous system to a maximal effort. As they get stronger and more "efficient" at lifting, their rep-to-max ratio usually tightens up.

✨ Don't miss: Calories Burned Based on Heart Rate: Why Your Apple Watch Might Be Lying to You

Older lifters (Masters athletes) often find they need more rest and can't handle the high-intensity singles that a chart might suggest. For a 50-year-old lifter, the "risk vs. reward" of actually testing a 1RM is often not worth it. They are better off staying in the 3-5 rep range and using a conservative conversion to estimate their progress.

How to calculate your own specific conversion

The most accurate 1 rep max conversion chart is the one you build for yourself over time.

Keep a training log. Every time you do a set to near-failure, write down the weight, the reps, and then—eventually—what you actually hit when you tested a heavy single. Over a year, you’ll notice a pattern. You might realize that for you, 85% always equals 4 reps, not the 5 or 6 the standard charts claim.

That is your "profile." Once you have that, you stop guessing. You start knowing.


Actionable steps for your next workout

Stop treating the 1RM chart as law. It’s a suggestion. To get the most out of it without ending up in a physical therapy office, follow these steps:

  • Pick one formula and stick to it. Don't hop between Epley and Brzycki just to find the number you like better. Consistency is more important than the specific math used.
  • Test in the "Sweet Spot." Only trust predictions made from sets of 3 to 6 reps. Anything higher is testing your lungs, not just your luck.
  • Apply a 10% "Ego Tax." Whatever the chart says your max is, subtract 10% and use that for your programming. It accounts for bad sleep, stress, and poor form.
  • Track RPE alongside reps. Note how hard the set actually felt. A "grindy" 5 reps at 200 lbs means something very different for your 1RM than a "smoke-show" 5 reps at the same weight.
  • Use lift-specific adjustments. Expect your deadlift to allow for more reps at a higher percentage than your overhead press or bench press.

Start recording your "Estimated 1RM" (e1RM) after every heavy session. Within three months, you’ll have a clearer picture of your actual strength floor and ceiling than any generic chart could ever provide.