Honestly, music in 2013 was a total mess. But the good kind of mess. You had Robin Thicke blurring lines, Miley Cyrus swinging on construction equipment, and Daft Punk trying to get lucky with Pharrell. Then this teenager from New Zealand showed up. She had huge hair, a minimalist beat, and a voice that sounded like she’d lived a thousand lives already. When Lorde’s "Royals" eventually took home the Grammy for song of the year 2013, it wasn't just a win for a catchy tune. It was a massive "shut up" to the glitz and over-the-top spending of the late 2000s pop era.
It changed everything.
Suddenly, you didn't need a four-on-the-floor dance beat to dominate the charts. You just needed a finger snap and some brutal honesty about being broke and bored.
The Weird Logic of the Song of the Year 2013
If you look at the nominees that year, it’s a time capsule of peak millennial culture. You had Pink and Nate Ruess with "Just Give Me a Reason," Bruno Mars doing his best police-impersonation on "Locked Out of Heaven," and Katy Perry’s "Roar." Even Macklemore was in the mix with "Same Love." On paper, Lorde shouldn't have won. She was sixteen. She was an outsider.
But "Royals" was an anthem for the rest of us.
The industry usually rewards the most expensive-sounding production. "Royals" cost almost nothing to make compared to a Max Martin or Dr. Luke track. Joel Little, the producer, basically built the track around Lorde’s vocals in a small studio in Auckland. The irony? A song about not caring about diamonds and Grey Goose became the biggest commercial juggernaut of the year.
It stayed at number one on the Billboard Hot 100 for nine weeks. Nine. That’s an eternity in pop years. People were obsessed with the fact that a kid was calling out the very industry she was currently conquering. It felt meta. It felt real.
Why Macklemore and Daft Punk Mattered Too
You can't talk about the song of the year 2013 without mentioning the confusion between "Record of the Year" and "Song of the Year." Daft Punk won Record of the Year for "Get Lucky." That makes sense—it’s a masterclass in production and performance. But Song of the Year is about the songwriting itself. The lyrics. The melody. The "bones" of the track.
✨ Don't miss: Cuba Gooding Jr OJ: Why the Performance Everyone Hated Was Actually Genius
Lorde and Joel Little wrote something that resonated because it was cynical.
"We’ll never be royals."
Everyone felt that. We were still crawling out of a global recession. Seeing pop stars sing about private jets felt increasingly gross. Lorde gave everyone permission to roll their eyes at the excess while still making a song you could actually hum. It’s a weird tightrope to walk, but she did it.
The Impact Nobody Saw Coming
Before 2013, pop music was loud. It was EDM-heavy. It was "Starships" and "Party Rock Anthem." After Lorde won, the "sad girl pop" genre exploded. You can draw a direct line from the success of the song of the year 2013 to artists like Billie Eilish, Olivia Rodrigo, and even the later, more stripped-back eras of Taylor Swift.
Minimalism became the new gold standard.
Producers realized they didn't need fifty layers of synths. They needed space. They needed "air" in the track. If you listen to "Royals" today, it still sounds incredibly modern because it’s so empty. There’s nowhere for a bad melody to hide.
Breaking Down the Competition
- Roar by Katy Perry: A powerhouse pop song, but it felt like something we’d heard before. It was safe.
- Blurred Lines: Let’s be real, this song aged like milk. Even back then, the lyrics were "sketchy" at best, though the groove was undeniable.
- Same Love: It was a massive cultural moment for marriage equality, but Lorde’s songwriting had a bit more of a timeless, poetic edge that the Academy tends to go for when they want to look "smart."
Lorde’s win was a signal that the "Tumblr Era" of aesthetic, moody, and self-aware music had finally arrived at the big table. She wasn't a Disney star. She wasn't a reality show winner. She was just a girl who liked short stories and hip-hop.
🔗 Read more: Greatest Rock and Roll Singers of All Time: Why the Legends Still Own the Mic
What Most People Get Wrong About Royals
There’s this persistent myth that "Royals" was an overnight success. It wasn't. It was released as a free download on SoundCloud first. It bubbled under the surface for months in New Zealand and Australia before it ever touched a US radio station.
Another misconception? That it’s a "hater" song.
Lorde has mentioned in interviews—specifically with Rolling Stone and NME back in the day—that she actually loves hip-hop and big pop. She wasn't trying to destroy the genre; she was just observing it from a distance. She grew up in a suburb called Devonport. It’s beautiful, but it’s quiet. When you’re a teenager in a quiet town watching music videos of people throwing money in pools, it feels like science fiction. That’s what the song is: a report from a distant planet.
The Technical Brilliance of the Songwriting
The structure of "Royals" is actually quite complex for how simple it sounds. The vocal harmonies are stacked in a way that mimics a choir or a religious experience. Joel Little used a lot of "sub-bass," which is that low-end frequency you feel in your chest rather than hear with your ears.
When it won song of the year 2013, people criticized the simplicity.
"It’s just a beat and a voice!"
Exactly. That’s the hardest thing to pull off. In a world of digital noise, silence is the loudest thing you can use. The lyrics use specific imagery—Cadillacs, Maybachs, diamonds on your timepiece—to create a contrast with the "cracked pavement" reality of the listener. It’s effective because it’s specific.
💡 You might also like: Ted Nugent State of Shock: Why This 1979 Album Divides Fans Today
The Legacy of 2013
Looking back, 2013 was a pivot point. We moved away from the "neon" era of the early 2010s into something grittier and more authentic. You had Kanye West releasing Yeezus, which was a sonic assault. You had Beyoncé dropping her self-titled visual album out of nowhere.
Amidst all that chaos, Lorde stood still.
She proved that you could be a "pop star" without playing the game. She didn't do the big dance routines. She didn't wear the sparkly costumes. She just stood there, clawing at the air with her fingers, and sang about being "queen bee" in her own small way. It was a victory for the introverts.
How to Apply the 2013 Mindset Today
If you’re a creator or just someone interested in how trends work, the lessons from the song of the year 2013 are still incredibly relevant. We are currently in another cycle of "over-production" with AI-generated content and hyper-polished social media.
People are craving the "Lorde effect" again.
- Strip it back: If your project feels cluttered, take things away until only the core message remains.
- Be the outsider: Don't try to mimic the current "royals" of your industry. Talk about what it’s like to be exactly where you are.
- Specifics matter: Instead of being "relatable" in a general way, use specific details from your life. The "cracked pavement" in your story is more interesting than a generic "hard road."
The win for "Royals" wasn't a fluke. It was an early warning sign that the internet was changing how we consume art. We no longer needed the gatekeepers to tell us what was cool. We found it on SoundCloud, shared it on Tumblr, and eventually forced the Grammys to pay attention.
To really understand the music of the last decade, you have to go back to that moment. Listen to the track again, but this time, pay attention to the silence between the beats. That’s where the magic happened.
Next Steps for Music Enthusiasts:
- Listen to the 2013 Nominees: Put "Royals," "Locked Out of Heaven," and "Roar" in a playlist. Notice the "loudness" difference between them.
- Explore the "Lorde-Descendants": Check out Billie Eilish’s Ocean Eyes or Olivia Rodrigo’s Pure Heroine influences to see how the minimalist DNA evolved.
- Analyze Your Favorite Tracks: Look for songs today that use "negative space." Identify if they are trying to capture that same raw, unpolished feeling that made 2013 such a weird, wonderful year for pop.