Let’s be real for a second. Before 2009, if you closed your eyes and thought of Sherlock Holmes, you probably saw a stiff, older British guy in a deerstalker hat smoking a pipe by a fireplace. He was intellectual. He was cold. He was, honestly, a bit of a bore for anyone under the age of fifty. Then Guy Ritchie and Robert Downey Jr. crashed the party. They didn't just adapt the character; they basically set the old version on fire and built something faster, dirtier, and way more fun from the ashes.
The Robert Downey Junior Sherlock Holmes wasn't a gentleman. He was a bare-knuckle boxer with a messy apartment and a serious hygiene problem. He was a disaster. But he was also a genius. People forget how much of a gamble this was back then. Downey was just coming off the massive success of Iron Man, and there was a real fear he’d just be "Tony Stark in Victorian London." Instead, he gave us something twitchy, vulnerable, and incredibly physical.
It worked. It worked so well that we’re still talking about a third movie nearly fifteen years after the second one dropped.
The "Bohemian" Detective vs. The Statue
Most people think Ritchie took massive liberties with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s work. The truth? He actually went back to the source material more than the "classic" movies did. In the books, Holmes is a mess. He’s a martial artist. He’s a "Bohemian" who hates polite society and keeps his tobacco in the toe of a Persian slipper.
Downey captured that manic energy perfectly. He didn't play a detective; he played an addict whose drug of choice happened to be observation. When you watch the 2009 film, you aren't just watching a mystery. You're watching a character study of a man who can't turn his brain off. That’s why the "Sherlock-vision" fight scenes—where the action slows down so we can see his mental calculations—felt so fresh. It translated internal genius into external spectacle. It showed us how he thought, not just that he thought.
The chemistry with Jude Law’s Dr. John Watson changed everything, too. Usually, Watson is a bumbling sidekick who exists just to say, "Amazing, Holmes!" But in this universe, Law is a war veteran with a gambling streak and a short fuse. They fight like an old married couple. They’re codependent. Honestly, the movies are more about their dysfunctional friendship than they are about the actual crimes. Without that specific bond, the Robert Downey Junior Sherlock Holmes films would just be loud action movies with fancy coats.
Why We Never Got Sherlock Holmes 3 (Yet)
The elephant in the room is the release schedule. Or the lack of one. A Game of Shadows came out in 2011. Since then? Radio silence, mostly.
We’ve had a decade of "it’s in development" updates. Schedules are the biggest culprit. Downey was locked into the Marvel Cinematic Universe for years, playing Iron Man in what felt like two movies every summer. Then Guy Ritchie moved on to other projects. Then there was a pandemic. Then the director changed—Dexter Fletcher was brought on to replace Ritchie.
🔗 Read more: Nikki Glaser Roasts Tom Brady: The Set That Actually Changed Her Life
Susan Downey, Robert’s wife and a powerhouse producer, has been vocal about the fact that they still want to do it. They don't want to rush a mediocre script just to cash a check. They want it to be right. In an era of endless reboots and rushed sequels, there's something kinda respectable about them waiting until the story actually matters. But let’s be honest: the clock is ticking. Downey isn't getting any younger, and the "action-hero detective" vibe requires a lot of physical stamina.
The Moriarty Problem and the Legacy of "A Game of Shadows"
The second film took a massive swing by introducing Professor James Moriarty, played by Jared Harris. Harris was brilliant because he didn't twirl a mustache. He was just as smart as Holmes but lacked the moral compass. The ending of that movie—the fall at Reichenbach Falls—left things on a cliffhanger that hasn't been resolved for over a decade.
We saw Holmes camouflaged in the chair at the end, proving he survived. We know he's out there. But the world of cinema has changed since 2011. We’ve seen Benedict Cumberbatch’s Sherlock, Jonny Lee Miller’s Elementary, and even Henry Cavill playing the character in Enola Holmes. The market is crowded.
Yet, none of them have that specific Victorian-punk aesthetic that Downey brought to the table. The Robert Downey Junior Sherlock Holmes version feels tactile. You can smell the coal smoke and the stale beer. It’s a version of London that feels lived-in and dangerous, not like a museum piece.
The Technical Brilliance of the "Downey Style"
If you go back and re-watch the first film today, pay attention to the sound design and the pacing. Hans Zimmer’s score is a masterclass in using "broken" instruments—out-of-tune banjos and clunky pianos—to reflect Holmes's fractured mind. It doesn't sound like a typical orchestral score. It sounds like a frantic heartbeat.
- The use of high-speed cameras for the "dissection" of fights.
- The heavy emphasis on "Baritsu" (the fictional martial art Doyle mentioned).
- The costume design that favored rumpled waistcoats over clean suits.
- The color palette: grays, browns, and deep greens that feel like an oil painting.
These weren't accidental choices. They were designed to make the Victorian era feel modern without using cell phones or cars. They used "Steampunk-lite" technology to show that 1890 was a time of terrifyingly fast change, much like today.
Is There Still an Audience?
A lot of critics wonder if people still care about this specific iteration. My take? Absolutely. There is a specific brand of wit in the Ritchie/Downey collaborations that hasn't been replicated. It's fast-talking, cynical, but ultimately warm.
When you look at the box office numbers, both films were monsters. They cleared $500 million each at a time when that was a much bigger deal than it is now. The "Sherlock Holmes Cinematic Universe" was actually discussed at one point, with spin-off shows for HBO Max (now Max) in the works. The appetite is there, but the execution has to be perfect because the bar was set so high by the first two entries.
How to Watch and What to Look For
If you’re diving back in or seeing them for the first time, don't treat them like a standard whodunit. Treat them like an action-adventure film where the "weapon" is the protagonist's eyes.
- Watch the background: Downey is constantly fidgeting or doing something in the background of shots that relates to his "observations." It’s a very detailed performance.
- Focus on the Watson/Mary dynamic: Kelly Reilly’s Mary Morstan is one of the few female characters in these types of movies who isn't a damsel. She sees right through Holmes's nonsense.
- Listen to the dialogue: It’s incredibly dense. You’ll catch jokes in the third viewing that you missed in the first two because the delivery is so rapid-fire.
The Robert Downey Junior Sherlock Holmes legacy isn't just about the movies themselves; it’s about how they gave a 120-year-old character a second life in the 21st century. Before this, Sherlock was a "smart guy." After this, he was a "cool guy."
Whether we ever get that third movie or not, the impact is undeniable. Downey took a character defined by his brain and gave him a soul, a punch, and a very dirty jacket.
📖 Related: Mooseblood: Why the Mosquito from Bee Movie is the Film's Most Chaotic Legend
Next Steps for Fans:
If you've already binged the films, go back and read A Study in Scarlet or The Sign of Four. You’ll be shocked at how many "modern" Downey-isms are actually pulled directly from the pages written in the 1880s. Also, keep an eye on Team Downey’s production announcements for the rumored Max series, as that seems to be where the franchise is heading next.