You walk into the State Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg, and it’s massive. Gold everywhere. Huge, echoing halls. But then you find yourself in front of it: Rembrandt’s The Return of the Prodigal Son painting. It’s not just big—it’s heavy. Not heavy in weight, though it’s a massive canvas, but heavy in the way it makes your chest feel. It’s arguably the most famous depiction of the biblical parable, yet it feels less like a Sunday school lesson and more like a messy, visceral family reunion that happened five minutes ago.
Rembrandt van Rijn was at the end of his rope when he painted this. Honestly, he was broke, he’d buried his wife and nearly all his children, and his reputation was basically in the toilet. He wasn't the flashy young star of Amsterdam anymore. He was an old man who knew a lot about losing things. That’s why this version of the return of the prodigal son painting feels so different from the stuff Rubens or Murillo were doing. There’s no party in the background. No fat calf being slaughtered yet. It’s just the quiet, devastating moment of contact.
The Hands That Don't Match
If you look closely at the father’s hands—and I mean really look—you’ll notice something weird. They aren't the same. The left hand is larger, more masculine, and looks like it’s gripping the son’s shoulder with some strength. The right hand? It’s elegant. Slender. It’s almost feminine in the way it rests flat against the boy’s back.
Art historians like Henri Nouwen, who literally wrote an entire book based on sitting in front of this painting for hours, argue that this was intentional. Rembrandt was showing a God (or a father) who possesses both masculine strength and feminine tenderness. It’s a radical idea for the 1660s. One hand holds, the other caresses. It’s a mother and a father in one body, welcoming back a kid who smells like pigs and failure.
The Son is a Total Mess
The son is barely recognizable as a human being. He’s got a shaved head, which back then was a sign of a prisoner or a slave—basically someone who had lost their identity. His shoes are falling apart. One is off his foot, revealing a heel that looks like it’s been walking on rocks for months.
It’s gross, really.
But that’s the point. Rembrandt doesn't give us a "pretty" repentance. He gives us the reality of hitting rock bottom. The son’s face is buried in the father’s chest, invisible to us. He doesn't have words anymore. He just has exhaustion.
💡 You might also like: Human DNA Found in Hot Dogs: What Really Happened and Why You Shouldn’t Panic
Why the Elder Brother is Creeping in the Corner
To the right, standing tall and wrapped in a red cloak that matches the father’s, is the elder brother. He’s judgmental. You can see it in his face—that pinched, "I followed all the rules and got nothing" look. He’s standing in the shadows, literally and figuratively.
He’s the observer.
Interestingly, many people think the father is the main character of the return of the prodigal son painting, but Rembrandt places the elder brother on the same visual plane as the father. They are the two "pillars" of the painting. The elder brother represents all of us when we feel like life isn't fair. He’s the person who can’t understand why the "bad" person gets the warm welcome. He’s wealthy, he’s clean, and he’s completely miserable.
Light and Shadow as a Weapon
Rembrandt was the king of chiaroscuro, but here he uses it to isolate the emotion. The light isn't coming from a window or a candle. It seems to be coming from the father himself. The background is a murky, dark abyss that swallows up the other three figures in the room. Who are they? Some say they’re servants, others say they’re just there to provide a "chorus" of witnesses.
The darkness matters because it represents the world the son just came out of. He’s stepping out of the blackness into the light of his father’s embrace. It’s high-stakes lighting. Without that darkness, the gold and red of the father’s robes wouldn't feel so much like a sanctuary.
The Mystery of the Commission
We actually don’t know who Rembrandt painted this for. Usually, a painting this big (eight feet tall!) would be a commission for a church or a wealthy patron. But there are no records.
📖 Related: The Gospel of Matthew: What Most People Get Wrong About the First Book of the New Testament
Some experts believe he painted it for himself.
Think about that. A dying, bankrupt artist painting a story about forgiveness and coming home. He wasn't trying to impress the art critics of Amsterdam anymore. He was trying to figure out his own soul. This is probably why the painting feels so private. You feel like you're intruding on a moment you weren't supposed to see.
What People Get Wrong About the Colors
If you see a print of this online, it often looks very yellow or orange. That’s partly because of the old varnish that’s sat on the canvas for centuries. When you see it in person, or look at high-res scans from the Hermitage, the reds are deep, blood-like. The "gold" is actually a lot of ochre and thick impasto paint.
Rembrandt didn't just brush the paint on; he globbed it. He used palette knives. He used his fingers. If you ran your hand over the father’s sleeve (please don't, you'll be arrested), it would feel like a topographical map. This texture adds a layer of "realness" that a smooth painting just can't match.
The Political Journey to Russia
How did a Dutch masterpiece end up in Russia? Catherine the Great. She was an art-buying machine. In 1766, she bought the painting from the collection of an elector in Saxony. Since then, it’s survived the Russian Revolution, the Siege of Leningrad (where it was hidden in a basement to protect it from Nazi bombs), and the fall of the Soviet Union.
It’s a survivor. Just like the son in the story.
👉 See also: God Willing and the Creek Don't Rise: The True Story Behind the Phrase Most People Get Wrong
How to Actually "See" the Painting
Most people spend thirty seconds looking at a masterpiece before moving on to the next one to get their "money's worth" at the museum. You can't do that with the return of the prodigal son painting. It’s too dense.
If you want to understand why people cry in front of this thing, you have to look at the feet. Specifically the son's left foot. The way the shoe has slipped off, showing the dirt and the vulnerability of the bare skin—that’s where the humanity is.
It reminds you that this isn't a story about "sin" in some abstract way. It’s a story about being tired. It’s about the relief of finally being able to stop running.
Common Misconceptions
- Myth: The father is blind.
- Reality: Rembrandt often painted elderly eyes as cloudy or recessed. While the father might be visually impaired (his eyes don't seem to focus on the son), his "sight" is through his hands.
- Myth: It was Rembrandt’s final painting.
- Reality: It was one of his last, but he was likely working on Simeon’s Song of Praise when he actually died in 1669.
Why it Still Matters in 2026
We live in a "cancel culture" world where if you mess up, you're usually out. The the return of the prodigal son painting offers the opposite narrative. It’s about the possibility of a total reset.
Whether you’re religious or not doesn't really matter when you're looking at it. You’re looking at a painting about the human need for belonging. We’ve all been the son (screwing up), we’ve all been the brother (being a judgmental jerk), and we all hope to eventually be the father (learning how to forgive).
Practical Steps for Art Lovers
If you’re interested in exploring this work deeper, don't just look at it on a phone screen. The scale is everything.
- Get a full-scale art book. The "Taschen" monographs on Rembrandt have incredible fold-out details of the brushwork. You need to see the "crust" of the paint.
- Compare it to his early work. Look at Rembrandt’s Prodigal Son in the Brothel (where he painted himself as the son, partying). The difference between his young ego and his old-age wisdom is staggering.
- Visit the Hermitage virtually. They offer high-resolution 360-degree tours. It’s not the same as being there, but you can zoom in further than the museum guards would ever let you in person.
- Read Henri Nouwen. Even if you aren't religious, his psychological breakdown of each character in the painting is the gold standard for understanding the emotional layers Rembrandt tucked into the corners of the frame.
The painting isn't just a relic. It’s a mirror. When you look at it, you aren't just seeing 17th-century oil on canvas; you're seeing your own baggage and your own hope for a second chance.