Why Power by Audre Lorde Still Hits Like a Freight Train Today

Why Power by Audre Lorde Still Hits Like a Freight Train Today

Audre Lorde didn't just write a poem. She trapped a lightning bolt of raw, unadulterated grief and political fury in a jar and called it Power by Audre Lorde. If you’ve read it, you know. It’s one of those pieces of literature that makes your skin crawl and your heart race at the same time. Writing it in the mid-1970s, Lorde was grappling with something so visceral it almost defies language, yet she found the words anyway. It’s a messy, violent, and deeply spiritual exploration of what happens when a Black woman’s voice meets the cold, hard wall of institutional white supremacy.

Most people encounter this poem in a college lit class or a social justice workshop. They talk about the metaphors. They talk about the "rhetoric." But honestly? That feels like a disservice to what Lorde was actually doing. She was screaming on the page because a ten-year-old boy named Clifford Glover had been shot in the back by a police officer in Queens, and the officer had just been acquitted. That is the heartbeat of this poem. It’s not an academic exercise. It is a survival manual for the soul in a world that feels increasingly soul-less.

The Brutal Reality Behind the Verse

You can't understand Power by Audre Lorde without knowing about Clifford Glover. It was 1973. Glover was walking with his stepfather. They were stopped by undercover officers, got scared, and ran. Officer Thomas Shea shot the boy. During the trial, the defense argued that Shea thought the ten-year-old was a "full-grown man" with a gun. He wasn't. He was a child. When the jury—eleven white men and one Black woman—acquitted Shea, Lorde was driving in her car. She was so overwhelmed by the news that she had to pull over and write.

She spoke about this moment later, describing how she felt a literal physical "power" or "energy" that could either be used for creation or destruction. That's the central tension. How do you take the "trapped" energy of rage and turn it into something that doesn't just destroy you from the inside out? Lorde writes about her mouth being "full of blood," a vivid, sickening image that suggests the difficulty of speaking when you are choking on the injustice of your own reality. It’s a poem about the limitations of poetry, which is a meta-commentary that hits hard if you've ever felt like words just aren't enough to fix a broken world.

The poem shifts between the personal and the systemic. Lorde isn't just mad at the cop. She’s looking at the jury. She’s looking at the one Black woman on that jury who, in Lorde’s eyes, was "convinced" or coerced into agreement. This isn't a poem about easy villains. It’s a poem about how power works on the psyche, how it makes us complicit in our own erasure.

Why the Imagery of Power by Audre Lorde Matters

Lorde uses imagery that feels almost elemental. She talks about the desert. She talks about thirst. There’s this recurring sense of being drained. When she mentions "the difference between poetry and rhetoric," she’s asking a question that every activist and writer has to face eventually: Are we just performing our pain, or are we actually moving the needle?

  • Rhetoric is just words.
  • Poetry, for Lorde, is a "revelatory distillation of experience."

She’s worried that if she can’t find a way to use her power correctly, she will become "a princess of the desert," reigning over nothing but dust and bones. It’s a terrifying thought. The idea that our anger, if not channeled, just turns us into caricatures of ourselves. She uses the phrase "corrupted into rhetoric" to describe the danger of losing the raw, honest edge of human feeling to the polished, empty language of politics.

The poem is also famous for that jarring image of the "whiteness" of the desert and the "blackness" of the speaker. It’s not subtle. Lorde wasn’t interested in being subtle. She was a Black, lesbian, mother, warrior, poet—those are her words—and she lived at the intersection of all those identities long before "intersectionality" became a buzzword in HR departments.

Dealing with the "Blood" in the Poem

One of the most difficult parts of Power by Audre Lorde is the ending. It’s gruesome. It’s uncomfortable. She imagines a scenario where the suppressed rage of the Black community boils over into a nihilistic violence. She talks about a teenager "clumped" in a doorway with a "pipe in his hand" and "the blood of some white woman" on his shoes.

People often want to skip over this. They want the "empowering" Audre Lorde who tells them that "your silence will not protect you." They want the poster-quote Lorde. But you can't have that Lorde without the Lorde who wrote this ending. She’s warning us. She’s saying that if a society refuses to provide justice, it shouldn't be surprised when it receives vengeance instead. It is a cautionary tale about the cost of systemic neglect. The "power" she’s talking about is the power of the explosion that happens when you keep a lid on a boiling pot for too long.

📖 Related: Turkey Thaw Time: What Most People Get Wrong Before Thanksgiving

Breaking Down the Misconceptions

People often think this poem is just about race. It’s not. It’s about the responsibility of the writer. Lorde is incredibly hard on herself in these stanzas. She questions her own role. She wonders if she is "using" the death of a child to make art, and that kind of self-scrutiny is rare.

It’s also not a "pro-violence" poem, despite how that ending reads to some. It’s a "pro-truth" poem. She is describing a psychic reality. If you live in a world where you see children who look like you being killed with impunity, your mind goes to dark places. Lorde is brave enough to map those dark places so we don't have to wander into them blindly.

Lessons We Can Actually Use

So, what do we do with this? If you’re a creative, a student, or just someone trying to navigate a politically charged world, Power by Audre Lorde offers a few specific insights that aren't just fluff.

First, acknowledge the physical sensation of your emotions. Lorde didn't start with a "thesis statement." She started with a feeling in her gut that made her pull her car over. If you're trying to create something meaningful, start with what makes your hands shake. That’s where the real "power" lives.

🔗 Read more: How to Find Smith-Corcoran Palatine Funeral Home Obituaries Without the Usual Stress

Second, understand the difference between being "heard" and being "effective." You can have the best rhetoric in the world, but if it doesn't lead to a shift in how power is distributed, it’s just noise. Lorde challenges us to move beyond the performance of activism and into the difficult work of internal transformation.

Third, look at the "jury" in your own life. Who are the people or institutions you are trying to convince? Are you compromising your truth to fit in with them? The tragedy of the Black woman on the jury in the poem is a reminder that being "in the room" isn't the same thing as having power if you've already been mentally conquered by the system.

How to Engage with Lorde’s Work Today

If this poem resonated with you, don't stop here. Lorde's essays in Sister Outsider are essential reading. Specifically, "The Uses of Anger: Women Responding to Racism" acts as a perfect companion piece to this poem. It explains the philosophy behind the poetry. It tells you that your anger is information. It’s a tool.

Don't just read it once. Read it out loud. Feel the rhythm of the words. Notice how the sentence lengths change, how the breath catches on certain phrases. Lorde was a master of prosody, and the way the poem sounds is just as important as what it says.

To truly honor the legacy of this work, look for the "Clifford Glovers" of today. Look for the stories that are being flattened into "rhetoric" and try to find the human heart underneath them. Use your own "power"—whatever that looks like—to refuse the easy silence that Lorde warned us against. Whether you're writing, voting, protesting, or just raising your kids to be more empathetic, you're participating in the struggle she documented so fiercely.

Start by journaling about a time you felt "choked" by an injustice. Don't worry about being poetic. Just get the "blood" out of your mouth and onto the paper. Once you've named it, you can start to decide what to do with the energy it creates. That is the first step toward turning raw emotion into actual, transformative power.