Twelve hours. That is how long it took for Shirley Clarke to strip away the soul of a man on camera. In 1966, inside her penthouse at the Chelsea Hotel, Clarke—a white, wealthy, avant-garde filmmaker—set her sights on Jason Holliday. He was a Black gay man, a "house boy," a hustler, and a performer who never quite got his big break. The result was Portrait of Jason, a film that feels less like a documentary and more like a high-stakes psychological autopsy.
It's raw. Honestly, it’s a hard watch.
Most people come to this movie expecting a simple piece of queer history. What they get is a blurred line between exploitation and art. You see Jason drinking Scotch. You see him smoking. He tells stories about his father, whom he calls "Brother Tough," and he laughs—that loud, theatrical, desperate laugh that starts to sound like a scream by the end of the night. By the time the sun comes up, Jason is broken. The "portrait" isn't of a man; it's of the debris left behind after a night of relentless interrogation.
The Night Everything Changed at the Chelsea Hotel
Shirley Clarke wasn't interested in a "nice" movie. She wanted the truth, or at least her version of it. On December 3, 1966, she and her crew, including Carl Lee (who was Jason’s friend and Clarke’s partner), started rolling. They didn't stop until they had used up thousands of feet of film.
Jason is "on" from the first second. He’s wearing a sharp suit. He’s got his lines ready. He wants to be a star. He thinks this is his screen test for a nightclub act. You’ve probably seen people like this—the life of the party who uses humor as a shield. But Clarke and Lee keep pushing. They stay behind the camera, their voices sometimes drifting in like ghosts, mocking him, prodding his insecurities, and demanding he "be real."
What does "real" even mean in a room where a woman is paying for your liquor just to see you cry?
The technical aspects are intentionally messy. The camera goes out of focus. The sound isn't always perfect. This was the "New American Cinema" movement in action. It rejected the polished lies of Hollywood. But in doing so, it created a new kind of lie. Because Jason is performing, he is always performing. Even when he’s sobbing about the abuse he suffered, you wonder if he’s doing it because that’s what the director wants.
Why the Portrait of Jason Movie is More Relevant Now Than Ever
We live in a world of "vulnerability porn." We scroll through TikTok and see people crying for views. We watch reality TV where producers manipulate contestants for a "breakdown" edit. Portrait of Jason was the blueprint for all of it.
When the film premiered at the New York Film Festival in 1967, it blew people's minds. Ingmar Bergman called it the most extraordinary film he had ever seen. But look closer at the power dynamic. You have a white woman behind the lens and a Black man in front of it. In 1966, that wasn't just a creative choice; it was a political minefield.
- The Power Gap: Jason was precarious. He lived on the fringes of society. Clarke had the money and the equipment.
- The Alcohol: The crew kept Jason’s glass full. As the Scotch disappears, the stories get darker.
- The Betrayal: Carl Lee, someone Jason trusted, is the one who grills him the hardest. He knows where the wounds are. He pokes them.
It's uncomfortable because we are complicit. As viewers, we are the voyeurs. We are sitting in that hotel room with them, watching a man unravel for our entertainment. If you’ve ever felt like you had to "perform" your trauma to be seen, this movie will hit you like a physical weight.
Reclaiming Jason: The 2013 Restoration
For a long time, this movie was almost lost. The original 16mm master was gone, and the prints floating around were grainy, battered versions that looked like a copy of a copy. Then, Project Shirley—a massive undertaking by Milestone Films—changed everything.
They found the original 16mm fine-grain master at the Academy Film Archive. The restoration, released in 2013, brought a startling clarity to Jason’s face. Suddenly, you could see the sweat. You could see the flicker of fear in his eyes when he realized the camera wasn't going to turn off.
This restoration didn't just fix the picture; it reignited the debate about what we owe the people we film. It led to a deeper look at Jason Holliday (born Aaron Payne). He wasn't just a character in a Shirley Clarke film. He was a person who lived a complicated, difficult life in a country that didn't want him to exist as a gay Black man.
What People Often Get Wrong
A lot of critics at the time thought Jason was just a "hustler" or a "clown." They missed the craft. Jason was a genius of self-invention. He took the name Jason Holliday because it sounded like a movie star. He created a persona because the reality of being Aaron Payne was too heavy to carry.
Some people think the film is a celebration of queer identity. Is it? Or is it a document of how society forces marginalized people to turn themselves into a spectacle just to get a seat at the table?
How to Watch and Analyze Portrait of Jason Today
If you’re going to watch the Portrait of Jason movie, don't do it as a passive observer. It’s too dangerous for that. You have to look at it through multiple lenses at once.
First, look at the Cinematography. Notice how Clarke uses the out-of-focus shots. It’s not a mistake. It’s a metaphor. The more Jason tries to present a clear image of himself, the more the camera blurs him out. It’s as if the film itself is saying, "I can't see you."
Second, listen to the Silence. The moments where Jason isn't talking are the most telling. The way he adjusts his glasses. The way he looks at the door. Those are the moments where the performance slips.
Lastly, consider the Legacy. Without this film, we don't have Paris Is Burning. We don't have the modern memoir-style documentary. Clarke broke the rules of how stories are told, even if the cost of that rule-breaking was Jason's dignity.
💡 You might also like: Bonnie Raitt Something to Talk About: What Really Happened with the 90s Biggest Blues Hit
Actionable Steps for Film Students and Enthusiasts
- Compare the Perspectives: Watch Portrait of Jason and then read about the "Direct Cinema" movement of the 60s. Contrast Clarke’s aggressive style with the "fly-on-the-wall" approach of filmmakers like Albert Maysles or D.A. Pennebaker.
- Research the Subject: Look into the life of Aaron Payne outside of the film. Understanding his history in Trenton and his aspirations in New York gives him back the humanity the film often strips away.
- Analyze the Power Dynamic: Write down every time an off-camera voice interrupts Jason. Notice who is in control of the narrative at any given moment. Is Jason ever actually in charge?
- Host a Discussion: This isn't a movie to watch alone. If you're a film programmer or just a fan, screen it with a group. The conversation afterward about ethics and exploitation is usually more intense than the movie itself.
The movie ends with Jason crying, his face filling the screen, while the crew tells him the film has run out. It's a brutal ending. There is no resolution. Jason just... stops. He goes back out into the night, and we go back to our lives. But you don't really leave Jason behind. He stays with you, a reminder that every portrait tells more about the person holding the brush than the person sitting for the painting.