You've probably seen them while scrolling late at night. Maybe it was a grainy YouTube thumbnail or a "leaked" TikTok video claiming to show massive glass towers or sprawling military bases. The idea of pictures of buildings on the dark side of the moon is one of those internet rabbit holes that never truly stays buried. It’s sticky. It taps into that primal human curiosity about what’s lurking just out of sight.
But let's get one thing straight immediately: the "dark side" isn't actually dark.
It’s just the far side. Because of tidal locking, the Moon takes the same amount of time to rotate on its axis as it does to orbit Earth. This means we only ever see one face. The far side gets just as much sunlight as the side we look at every night. We just can't see it from our backyards. This physical barrier—the literal bulk of the Moon blocking our direct line of sight—is the perfect breeding ground for myths.
The "Alien Base" obsession and the pareidolia trap
Most of the "evidence" people cite when talking about lunar structures comes from Pareidolia. That's the psychological phenomenon where your brain tries to make sense of random data. It's why you see a face in a burnt piece of toast or a dragon in a cloud.
When you're looking at low-resolution orbital photography from the 1960s or 70s, a jagged crater rim can easily look like a 90-degree angle. A long shadow cast by a jagged boulder looks like a towering spire.
Take the famous "Shard" or the "Tower" spotted in Lunar Orbiter 3 images. To the untrained eye, it looks like a massive, skinny structure reaching miles into the lunar sky. Honestly, it looks creepy. But when you apply modern image processing or look at the same coordinates with higher-resolution cameras, like the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), the "building" vanishes. It turns out to be a light bleed on the film or a specific angle of the sun hitting a common geological feature.
NASA’s LRO has been orbiting the moon since 2009. It has mapped the surface in incredible detail. We’re talking about resolutions down to 50 centimeters per pixel. If there were a skyscraper or a "Moon base" there, we’d see the literal front door by now. Yet, the pictures of buildings on the dark side of the moon that circulate today are almost always blurry, fourth-generation copies of old film. Why is that? Because high definition is the enemy of the unexplained.
What China’s Yutu-2 actually found
If there was ever a time for the "secret base" theory to be proven right, it was in 2019. That’s when the Chinese Chang'e 4 mission became the first to actually land on the far side. They sent a rover called Yutu-2.
📖 Related: Why the time on Fitbit is wrong and how to actually fix it
In late 2021, the internet went into a total meltdown. The rover’s camera captured a blurry, cubic shape on the horizon. The media immediately dubbed it the "Mystery House." For a few weeks, the "pictures of buildings on the dark side of the moon" crowd felt completely vindicated. It looked geometric. It looked artificial.
Then the rover actually drove closer.
As the distance closed, the "house" lost its sharp edges. It wasn't a building. It wasn't an alien outpost. It was a rock. Specifically, it was a piece of impact ejecta—a stone kicked up by a meteorite strike—that just happened to be shaped somewhat like a rabbit. The "geometric" look was just a result of pixelation and the way the light hit its flat surfaces from a distance. It’s a bit of a letdown, isn't it? Real science often is. But the reality—that we can drive a robot on the far side of a celestial body—is actually way cooler than a fake stone hut.
Why the "Dark Side" remains a conspiracy magnet
There's a reason we don't hear as many conspiracies about the "Light Side." We can see it. You can buy a decent telescope for a few hundred bucks and look at the Sea of Tranquility yourself. You can see the Apollo landing sites if you have a powerful enough setup (though even then, they're just tiny specks).
The far side represents the unknown.
Radio silence is the big one. Because the Moon’s mass blocks radio signals from Earth, any craft on the far side is cut off from us. To talk to Yutu-2, China had to launch a special relay satellite, Queqiao, to sit in a specific orbit and bounce signals back. This "radio shadow" makes people think things are being hidden. If you wanted to hide a base, that’s where you’d put it, right?
But "could be there" isn't the same as "is there."
👉 See also: Why Backgrounds Blue and Black are Taking Over Our Digital Screens
The role of CGI and "UFOlogy" influencers
We have to talk about the modern era of misinformation. Ten years ago, faking a moon base required some decent Photoshop skills. Today? A teenager with a generative AI tool or a copy of Unreal Engine 5 can create "leaked" footage that looks terrifyingly real.
A lot of the viral pictures of buildings on the dark side of the moon are actually digital art pieces or clips from sci-fi movies like Iron Sky or Transformers. They get stripped of their context, watermarked with "Top Secret," and shared by accounts looking for engagement.
The incentive is purely financial. Views equals money. If you post a high-res photo of a gray, dusty crater, nobody clicks. If you post a grainy, flickering video of a "secret lunar hangar," you get a million shares. You’ve got to be skeptical. Ask yourself: if this was a real leak from a whistleblower, why is the resolution worse than a 2004 flip phone?
Real "buildings" are coming (but they aren't there yet)
The irony in all this is that we will eventually see pictures of buildings on the lunar surface. But they’ll be built by humans.
NASA’s Artemis program and China’s International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) are both aiming for the lunar south pole. This area is strategically vital because of "peaks of eternal light" and craters in permanent shadow that hold water ice.
- Regolith 3D Printing: We won't haul bricks to the moon. Future buildings will likely be "printed" using lunar dust (regolith) and microwave energy.
- Inflatable Habitats: Companies like Sierra Space are working on expandable modules that offer more volume and radiation protection than metal tubes.
- Subterranean Bases: The real "secret bases" will likely be inside lava tubes. These are natural underground tunnels formed by ancient volcanic activity. They provide natural shielding from cosmic radiation and micrometeorites.
So, while the grainy photos of "ancient ruins" are almost certainly geological illusions, the future of lunar architecture is very real. It just looks a lot more like a high-tech igloo than a gothic cathedral.
How to verify lunar images yourself
Next time you see a "smoking gun" photo, don't just take it at face value. Do a quick check.
✨ Don't miss: The iPhone 5c Release Date: What Most People Get Wrong
First, look for the source. If it doesn't have an ID number (like those from the LROC Image Search), it's probably fake. NASA, ESA, and JAXA all maintain public archives. You can literally go to the LROC Quickmap and zoom in on almost any coordinate on the Moon.
Second, check the sun angle. Lunar shadows are incredibly long and sharp because there’s no atmosphere to scatter the light. A small rock can cast a shadow that looks like a massive spire if the sun is low on the horizon.
Third, consider the scale. People often point to "tracks" or "roads." On the Moon, a "road" that is visible from a low-res satellite would have to be hundreds of feet wide. That's a lot of infrastructure for a "secret" base.
The Moon is a harsh, desolate, and beautiful place. It doesn't need fake buildings to be interesting. The fact that it’s a graveyard of craters telling the 4-billion-year history of our solar system is plenty.
To stay truly informed, move away from the "leak" channels. Follow the actual mission logs from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter or the recent Indian Chandrayaan-3 mission. If you want to see what's actually happening on the lunar surface, look at the raw data archives provided by the Planetary Data System (PDS). That’s where the real science—and the real images—live. The truth is usually less "Hollywood," but it’s a lot more permanent.
Next Steps for Fact-Checking Lunar Mysteries:
- Use the LROC Quickmap: Navigate to the LROC website and explore the far side yourself. You can toggle different layers, including terrain roughness and slope, to see how "buildings" are actually just craters.
- Reverse Image Search: If you see a viral "building" photo, drop it into Google Lens or TinEye. Nine times out of ten, you'll find it's a cropped version of a known geological formation or a still from a movie.
- Learn Lunar Geology: Read up on "impact melt" and "ejecta blankets." Understanding how rocks behave when a meteor hits the moon at 12 miles per second explains almost every "artificial" shape ever found.