You probably grew up seeing them. Maybe they were in a primary classroom or taped inside a heavy blue paperback. Those muscular, larger-than-life figures with square jaws and gleaming armor. Honestly, for a lot of people, the pictures in the Book of Mormon are more vivid than the actual text. It’s funny how a single painting can override five hundred pages of scripture in your brain.
But here’s the thing. Those images aren't just decorations. They're interpretations.
When you look at a painting of Nephi building a ship or Captain Moroni raising the Title of Liberty, you aren't looking at a photograph. You're looking at the artistic choices of people like Arnold Friberg, Minerva Teichert, or Tom Lovell. These artists basically built the visual DNA of a global religion. They decided what "ancient America" looked like, even when the text itself was pretty vague about the specifics.
The Friberg Effect and Muscle-Bound Heroes
Let’s talk about Arnold Friberg. You know the name. Even if you don't, you know the style. In the 1950s, Adele Cannon Howells, the Primary General President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, wanted to give kids something visual. She actually used her own money to commission Friberg to do a series of paintings.
Friberg was a powerhouse. He’d worked on The Ten Commandments with Cecil B. DeMille. He brought that Hollywood scale to his pictures in the Book of Mormon. His characters have biceps that look like they belong in a bodybuilding competition. His Brother of Jared is a mountain of a man.
Some people find this a bit much. Critics say it makes the prophets look like superheroes rather than real, struggling humans. But you can't deny the impact. For decades, these twelve paintings were the only window many people had into the narrative. They defined the "look" of the Nephites. Red capes, Roman-influenced armor, and huge, sweeping vistas.
It’s actually kinda fascinating. If you look closely at Friberg’s work, you’ll see he was obsessed with detail. The textures of the fur, the shine of the metal, the grit in the dirt. He wasn't just painting a scene; he was building a world. But he was also a product of his time. Those mid-century illustrations reflect a very specific, masculine American aesthetic.
✨ Don't miss: Why T. Pepin’s Hospitality Centre Still Dominates the Tampa Event Scene
Minerva Teichert: A Different Kind of Brushstroke
Then there’s Minerva Teichert. She’s the antidote to Friberg’s hyper-masculinity.
Teichert was a rancher’s wife from Wyoming who studied under Robert Henri in New York. Her style is theatrical, loose, and incredibly vibrant. While Friberg was focused on individual heroics, Teichert was focused on the pageantry. She painted crowds. She painted women. She painted the Savior in a way that felt approachable and ethereal at the same time.
If you look at her pictures in the Book of Mormon, you’ll notice they feel like murals. There’s a flow to them. In her "Christ in America," the figures aren't just standing there; they’re leaning in, desperate to touch the hem of his robe. Her work often feels more "Western" than "Middle Eastern" or "Mesoamerican." You can see the influence of the Great Plains and the open sky in her brushwork.
Actually, for a long time, her work was tucked away. It wasn't as "official" as Friberg’s. But in recent years, there’s been a massive resurgence in appreciation for her art. People crave that softer, more communal perspective. It feels more human. Less like a comic book and more like a dream.
The Problem with Accuracy
Here is where it gets tricky. Where did these events actually happen?
The Church doesn't have an official position on the geography of the Book of Mormon. Some scholars think it was in Mesoamerica (Southern Mexico and Guatemala). Others point to the "Heartland" model in the United States. Artists have to pick a side, whether they mean to or not.
🔗 Read more: Human DNA Found in Hot Dogs: What Really Happened and Why You Shouldn’t Panic
When an artist paints a Mayan-style temple in the background, they are making a theological statement. When they paint a Nephite wearing a breastplate that looks like it came from the Ohio River valley, they’re doing the same.
- Mesoamerican Influence: Think of artists like Jorge Cocco Santángelo. His "sacrocubism" style doesn't worry about being a photograph. It uses shapes and colors to evoke a feeling. But many of his backgrounds lean into the architecture of the Yucatan.
- The "Everyman" Approach: More modern illustrators try to keep things generic. They use earth tones, simple linen tunics, and nondescript landscapes. The goal is to let the reader project their own understanding onto the page.
It’s sort of a losing game, honestly. You can't please everyone. If you make the people look too much like one specific ethnic group, you alienate another. If you make them too generic, the art feels bland.
The Power of the Image in the Digital Age
Nowadays, we’re flooded with pictures in the Book of Mormon. It’s not just the twelve Friberg paintings anymore. We have the "Book of Mormon Videos" produced by the Church, which basically act as moving paintings. These videos have their own aesthetic—very gritty, very "real." They use actors with diverse backgrounds to reflect the complex ancestry described in the record.
This shifts the mental "defaults" for the next generation. A kid today might not think of Nephi as a bodybuilder. They might think of him as a teenager who looks like he actually spent time in the Arabian desert.
There's also the rise of "Interiority" in art. Contemporary artists like Annie Henrie Nader or J. Kirk Richards focus on the emotional state of the characters. It’s less about the "big battle" and more about the quiet prayer. Richards, for instance, uses a very textured, almost weathered style. His paintings look like they were pulled out of the earth. They don't look "new." They look ancient.
What Most People Miss
People often overlook the "incidental" art. The maps. The diagrams of the plates. The small pen-and-ink sketches in the margins of study guides.
💡 You might also like: The Gospel of Matthew: What Most People Get Wrong About the First Book of the New Testament
These things do a lot of heavy lifting. They help us visualize the complex "Who’s Who" of the text. Because, let’s be real, the Book of Mormon has a lot of people with names that start with "M." The pictures help us keep them straight.
But there's a danger in relying too much on the visual. An image can lock your imagination. If you always see Abinadi as an old man with white hair standing before King Noah, you might miss the possibility that he was younger, or that the "fire" was more metaphorical than literal. The text says he was "in disguise" when he came back to the city. Friberg’s Abinadi is... not exactly inconspicuous. He's a glowing giant.
Actionable Insights for Using Visuals in Study
If you’re looking to deepen your understanding of the text through art, don't just stick to the classics.
First, compare and contrast. Take a single scene—say, Lehi’s Dream—and look at how five different artists handled it. Teichert focuses on the path and the light. Friberg focuses on the grit of the people at the tree. Cocco focuses on the geometric shapes. Seeing the different interpretations forces your brain to go back to the text to see what’s actually there and what the artist added.
Second, look for the women. The Book of Mormon text doesn't name many women, but the artists have started to fill in those gaps. Look at art that highlights the mothers of the stripling warriors or the wife of King Lamoni. It changes the "vibe" of the story from a military history to a family history.
Third, embrace the abstract. Sometimes a realistic painting is too distracting. Abstract art allows you to focus on the symbolism. If you’re struggling with a specific passage, try looking for non-representational art that deals with the same themes—light, darkness, pruning, or growth.
The pictures in the Book of Mormon are tools, not transcripts. They are beautiful, flawed, inspiring, and sometimes totally weird. Use them to spark a question, but always let the text have the final word.
To expand your visual library, start by browsing the Gospel Art Gallery on the official Church website, but then branch out to independent creators on platforms like Instagram or at the BYU Museum of Art. You'll find that the "look" of the Book of Mormon is a lot broader and more diverse than that one blue book led you to believe.