Space is mostly black. If you flew out past Pluto and looked out the window, you wouldn't see those glowing neon nebulae or sparkling purple galaxies that dominate your Instagram feed. You'd see a lot of nothing. Dark, cold, infinite nothing, punctuated by tiny pinpricks of light that don't even twinkle because there's no atmosphere to distort them.
So, are photos of the cosmos fake?
Actually, no. They’re more real than what your eyes can see. Human biology is kinda limited. Our retinas evolved to track predators on the savannah and find ripe fruit, not to collect ancient photons from 13 billion light-years away. When we look at the night sky, we’re seeing a low-resolution, "live" feed. Space telescopes like the James Webb (JWST) or the Hubble are doing something else entirely: they’re long-exposure time machines.
The Big Lie About Color in Space
Let's get this out of the way: if you were standing right next to the Pillars of Creation, they wouldn't look green and red. They’d likely look like a dusty, grey fog. Most photos of the cosmos use something called "representative color" or "false color."
Don't let the word "false" trip you up. It isn't about deception.
Astronomers use filters to capture specific wavelengths of light that the human eye can't detect. The JWST, for instance, primarily looks at infrared. We can't see infrared. If NASA didn't assign colors to those data points, the images would just be invisible. Scientists map these invisible wavelengths to the visible spectrum—shifting infrared down into reds, oranges, and yellows so we can actually interpret the data.
It’s basically a translation. Like translating a German poem into English so you can understand the emotion behind it.
The "Hubble Palette" Explained
You’ve probably seen the iconic orange and blue shots of nebulae. That’s often the "Hubble Palette." In this specific setup, light emitted by sulfur atoms is assigned to red, hydrogen to green, and oxygen to blue.
Interestingly, in real life, both hydrogen and sulfur look pretty reddish to us. If NASA used "true" color, these photos would just be a messy, indistinct pink blob. By separating them into the RGB (Red, Green, Blue) channels, we can see exactly where the different gases are interacting. It turns a blurry photo into a chemical map. It's brilliant.
📖 Related: robinhood swe intern interview process: What Most People Get Wrong
Why Long Exposures Change Everything
Our eyes "refresh" their view about every fraction of a second. We don't have a "long exposure" mode in our brains. Space telescopes, however, can stare at a single patch of darkness for hundreds of hours.
Think about the Hubble Deep Field.
In 1995, Robert Williams, who was the director of the Space Telescope Science Institute, decided to point Hubble at a patch of sky that looked completely empty. It was a huge gamble. People thought it was a waste of expensive satellite time. But because the camera stayed open for 10 days straight, it collected enough faint light to reveal over 3,000 galaxies in a spot of sky no bigger than a grain of rice held at arm's length.
That is the power of photos of the cosmos. They accumulate reality over time.
The Weird Physics of Diffraction Spikes
Have you noticed those "stars" in photos that have long, pointy spikes coming off them? You might think they're just an artistic touch. They aren't. They’re actually an artifact of the telescope's physical structure.
In Hubble photos, stars usually have four spikes. In JWST photos, they have eight.
This happens because of "diffraction." When light hits the struts that hold up the telescope's secondary mirror, it bends around them. The JWST has a hexagonal mirror and a three-legged support structure, which creates that specific eight-pointed "snowflake" look on bright stars.
- Hubble stars: 4 points.
- JWST stars: 6 large points + 2 small horizontal ones.
- Your eyes: No spikes (unless you have astigmatism or are squinting through eyelashes).
It’s a fingerprint of the machine that took the picture. If you see a "space photo" with a dozen random spikes, it’s probably AI-generated or a digital painting, because physics doesn't work that way.
👉 See also: Why Everyone Is Looking for an AI Photo Editor Freedaily Download Right Now
Why We Can't Just Use "Normal" Cameras
Cameras on Earth have to deal with the atmosphere. It's like trying to take a photo from the bottom of a swimming pool. The air is turbulent, it's full of moisture, and it glows.
This is why photos of the cosmos taken from the ground, like those from the Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile, often use "Adaptive Optics." They actually fire lasers into the sky to create an "artificial star." By measuring how much that laser light twinkles, a computer can deform the telescope's mirror thousands of times per second to cancel out the atmospheric blur.
It's high-tech sorcery.
But even with that, space is the place to be. There’s no "light pollution" in orbit. On Earth, our sky is getting increasingly crowded with Starlink satellites and city glow. Astronomers are genuinely worried that ground-based photography of the deep universe might become impossible within a few decades.
The Raw Data: What a Photo Actually Looks Like First
If you saw the raw files coming off a spacecraft, you'd be disappointed. They’re black and white. They’re covered in "noise" and white specks from cosmic rays hitting the sensor.
Processing photos of the cosmos is a labor-intensive craft.
- Calibration: Scientists subtract "dark frames" to remove the digital heat noise from the sensor.
- Stacking: They take dozens of short exposures and layer them on top of each other to sharpen the image.
- Stretching: Since space is so dark, most of the data is scrunched up in the dark end of the histogram. They "stretch" the levels so the faint details become visible to the eye.
- Cleaning: They manually remove the streaks caused by satellites passing through the frame.
Joseph DePasquale and Alyssa Pagan at the Space Telescope Science Institute are two of the people who actually turn the JWST's binary code into those breathtaking masterpieces. They aren't just "photoshopping" things to look pretty; they are making editorial choices to highlight scientific features, like shockwaves in a gas cloud or the birth of a star.
Common Misconceptions About Space Images
"It's all CGI."
Nope. The shapes, the positions of the stars, and the structures of the galaxies are mathematically precise. If you pointed a powerful enough telescope at the same spot, you'd see the same structures, just fainter and less colorful.
✨ Don't miss: Premiere Pro Error Compiling Movie: Why It Happens and How to Actually Fix It
"The colors are random."
There’s a logic to it. Usually, "Chromatic Ordering" is followed. The shortest wavelengths of light (the highest energy) are assigned blue, and the longest (lowest energy) are assigned red. This keeps the physical "feel" of the light consistent with how we perceive the world.
"Space is crowded."
Photos make it look like galaxies are crashing into each other left and right. In reality, the distance between stars is so vast that when two galaxies "collide," it’s highly unlikely that any two stars will actually hit each other. It’s more like two swarms of bees passing through each other.
How You Can Take Your Own Photos of the Cosmos
You don't need a multi-billion dollar budget. Honestly, you don't even need a telescope to start.
Modern smartphones have "Night Mode" which is basically a simplified version of what Hubble does. If you put your phone on a tripod in a dark area and let it take a 30-second exposure of the Milky Way, you’ll see way more stars than your eyes can detect.
If you want to go deeper, look into "EAA" or Electronically Assisted Astronomy. It uses small CMOS sensors (like the one in your phone, but better) to live-stack images through a backyard telescope. It allows you to see colorful nebulae from a light-polluted suburban driveway.
Actionable Next Steps for Enthusiasts
If you're fascinated by these images and want to go beyond just looking at them on a screen, here is how to get involved:
- Visit the MAST Archive: The Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST) is where the raw data lives. It’s public. If you have some technical skill, you can download the actual data from the JWST and process it yourself.
- Check Light Pollution Maps: Use a tool like Blue Marble or LightPollutionMap.info to find a "Bortle 1" or "Bortle 2" location near you. Seeing the cosmos with your own eyes in a truly dark sky is a life-changing experience that no photo can fully replicate.
- Follow the "Image of the Day": NASA’s APOD (Astronomy Picture of the Day) has been running since the 90s. It’s the gold standard for curated, explained space photography.
- Download Stellarium: It’s a free, open-source planetarium software. It helps you understand where those famous nebulae are located in relation to the constellations you know.
The universe isn't just a collection of pretty wallpapers. Every one of these photos of the cosmos is a record of a massive, violent, or beautiful event that happened millions of years ago. We're just the lucky ones who finally built the eyes big enough to see it.