True crime is everywhere. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting a podcast about a serial killer or a documentary about a heist gone wrong. But there’s a specific niche that hits different. It’s that weird, blurry line where the police report meets the campfire story. When Hulu dropped Out There: Crimes of the Paranormal, it didn't just retell old ghost stories; it dug into the actual paperwork of the impossible.
The show is wild.
Most true crime sticks to ballistics and DNA. These episodes? They stick to the stuff that makes detectives look at each other and just shrug. We’re talking about cases where the "who" might be a person, but the "how" feels like it’s bleeding over from another dimension. It’s messy, complicated, and honestly, a bit terrifying because the victims are real, even if the perpetrators aren't easily explained.
The Cases That Stick With You
Take the "Smiley Face Killers" theory or the strange disappearances in national parks. When you look at specific Out There: Crimes of the Paranormal episodes, you see a pattern. It isn't just about the supernatural. It's about how the human brain tries to make sense of a tragedy that doesn't fit into a box.
One of the most jarring segments deals with the "Long Island Serial Killer" connections or the bizarre sightings around the Pine Barrens. In the Jersey Devil episode, the show doesn't just give you a guy in a rubber suit. It looks at the historical context of the Leeds family and how a political feud in the 1700s birthed a monster that people still swear they see today. It’s about the crime of reputation as much as any physical assault.
The production value is high, but it’s the witnesses that do the heavy lifting. You see people who are clearly traumatized. They aren't looking for fame. Most of them look like they wish they’d never seen whatever it was they saw. That’s the core of the show’s appeal. It treats the paranormal not as a "spooky" gimmick, but as a genuine element of a criminal investigation that was either ignored or suppressed by local authorities.
💡 You might also like: Not the Nine O'Clock News: Why the Satirical Giant Still Matters
Why We Can't Stop Watching This Stuff
Why are we obsessed? Maybe it’s because reality feels a bit too rigid lately. Or maybe it’s because the "paranormal" offers a weird kind of comfort—if there are monsters in the woods, then maybe there’s something after this, too.
But for the people in these episodes, it isn't a hobby. It’s a haunting.
The episode covering the "UFO Cults" or the strange lights associated with missing persons cases highlights a terrifying intersection. It’s where belief becomes a weapon. When a crime happens in the shadow of a paranormal event, the justice system usually fails. Lawyers don't know how to cross-examine a poltergeist. Juries don't want to hear about portals. So, these cases stay cold. They sit in filing cabinets gathering dust until a show like this decides to shine a light on the forensic evidence that everyone else called "anomalous."
The Forensic Side of the Impossible
You've got to look at the evidence. In several Out There: Crimes of the Paranormal episodes, the show highlights physical traces. Scorch marks. Unexplained radiation levels. Medical reports of injuries that shouldn't be possible according to standard physics.
Critics often say it’s all mass hysteria. "It's just the wind," or "People see what they want to see." But when you have multiple, unrelated witnesses describing the exact same non-human entity at the scene of a hit-and-run or a disappearance, the "mass hysteria" explanation starts to feel like a lazy way out for the police. The show pushes back against that laziness. It asks: what if the witness is telling the truth, and our definition of "possible" is just too small?
📖 Related: New Movies in Theatre: What Most People Get Wrong About This Month's Picks
Breaking Down the Most Bizarre Episodes
The "Ghost of the Highway" narratives are particularly grim. These aren't just urban legends about hitchhikers disappearing. They are documented cases where drivers have called 911 reporting a collision, only for police to find no body, no blood, and yet, the car is totaled as if it hit a brick wall.
Then there’s the skinwalker lore. This is where the show gets deeply respectful and incredibly eerie. By talking to Indigenous communities, the series explores how "paranormal" is often just a Western word for things other cultures have understood for centuries. The crimes here—livestock mutilations, people vanishing from locked rooms—take on a much heavier weight when you realize the people living there are terrified of even speaking the name of the entity involved.
It’s not just "spooky." It’s a cultural trauma.
The episode on the "Men in Black" is equally unsettling because it moves the paranormal into the realm of government conspiracy. It looks at the harassment of UFO witnesses. It's a crime of intimidation. When a person is told to "forget what they saw" or face the consequences, that’s a violation of civil liberties, regardless of whether they saw a weather balloon or a craft from Zeta Reticuli.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Show
People think this is Ancient Aliens with a badge. It’s not.
👉 See also: A Simple Favor Blake Lively: Why Emily Nelson Is Still the Ultimate Screen Mystery
The biggest misconception is that the show "proves" ghosts exist. It doesn't. What it actually does is document the impact of the paranormal on the legal system. It's about the families left behind who are told their loved one "just walked away" because the alternative is too weird for the sheriff to put in a report.
Out There: Crimes of the Paranormal episodes focus on the human cost.
If you go into it expecting a jump-scare fest, you’ll be disappointed. If you go into it expecting a psychological study of how high-strangeness ruins lives, you’ll be hooked. The show sits in that uncomfortable middle ground where you start questioning the reliability of your own senses.
Actionable Steps for the Paranormal Sleuth
If these episodes have left you wanting to do your own digging, you need to be smart about it. Don't just browse Reddit threads.
- Check the FOIA Electronic Reading Room. The FBI has a "Vault" where you can look up declassified documents on everything from Cattle Mutilations to the Blue Book files. It’s dry, but it’s real.
- Look at local newspaper archives. Often, the "paranormal" stuff is stripped out of modern retellings. Looking at the original reporting from the 1970s or 80s usually reveals details that were later "cleaned up" to make the story sound more believable.
- Verify witness backgrounds. One thing the show does well is vet its sources. If you're researching a case, see if the witness had anything to gain. Usually, the most credible paranormal witnesses are the ones who lost their jobs or reputations by coming forward.
- Study the topography. Many of the cases in the series happen in specific geographical locations—limestone caves, areas with high magnetic interference, or near water. There’s a physical component to these "out there" crimes that often gets overlooked.
The truth isn't just out there; it's usually buried under a pile of paperwork and "rational" explanations that don't actually explain anything. Watching these episodes is a reminder that the world is much weirder than we like to admit, and justice is often hindered by our own refusal to see it.