Walk into the bathysphere. Pull the lever. As the capsule descends into the crushing dark of the Atlantic, a projector flickers to life. You see a man with a sharp jawline and a sharper ego, Andrew Ryan, asking a question that basically defines the internal conflict of the 21st century. He rejects the government. He rejects religion. He wants a world where the "great" aren't held back by the "small." This is the introduction to Rapture, and the banner hanging over the gate says it all: No gods and kings only man.
It’s a line that launched a thousand philosophy papers and probably a few hundred questionable tattoos. But honestly, most people miss the point. They think it’s just about being an atheist or hating monarchy. It’s way messier than that.
The Objectivist Nightmare Under the Sea
Ken Levine and the team at Irrational Games didn't just pull this phrase out of thin air when they developed BioShock in 2007. They were dismantling the ideas of Ayn Rand. Specifically, her philosophy of Objectivism. If you’ve ever slogged through Atlas Shrugged, you know the vibe. It’s the belief that radical self-interest is the only moral way to live.
In Rapture, no gods and kings only man meant a total divorce from traditional authority. No God to tell you what's sinful. No King to tax your paycheck to feed the poor. Sounds like a libertarian paradise, right? Well, until the literal and metaphorical pipes start leaking.
The problem is that when you remove "Gods" and "Kings," you don't actually get rid of the power structures. You just hand the keys to the guy with the most money. Andrew Ryan claimed to hate kings, but he ruled Rapture with an iron fist. He became the very thing he protested. He was a king in a suit, enforcing his "no kings" rule with lethal security bots. That’s the irony that makes the game a masterpiece.
Why the phrase still haunts us
We’re living in an era where tech billionaires are basically trying to build their own Raptures. Look at the talk about Mars colonies or seasteading. The rhetoric is eerily similar. They want to escape the "parasites"—Ryan’s word for anyone who uses collective resources—and build something pure.
But Rapture proved that "only man" is the scariest part of the equation.
Man is flawed. Man is greedy. Without some kind of moral or social guardrail, the "Great Chain" Ryan talked about doesn't pull everyone up. It chokes them.
The Narrative Architecture of a Collapse
Let’s get into the nitty-gritty of the game’s design. The phrase no gods and kings only man isn't just a decoration; it’s a warning. When you find the first audio diary from Bill McDonagh, you realize the city didn't fail because of some outside invasion. It failed because of the philosophy itself.
💡 You might also like: Why the GTA San Andreas Motorcycle is Still the Best Way to Get Around Los Santos
McDonagh was a plumber. A regular guy. He watched as Ryan, the man who preached freedom, started seizing private property and banning trade with the surface because he was paranoid.
It’s wild.
Ryan was so obsessed with his vision of a world without "Kings" that he became a tyrant to protect it. He couldn't handle the fact that in a truly free market, someone like Frank Fontaine could come along and outmaneuver him.
BioShock shows us that "No Kings" usually just means "No Kings but me."
The ADAM Factor: Science Without Borders
The secondary layer of this philosophy is the "No Gods" part. In Rapture, science wasn't restricted by ethics or "petty" morality. Bridgette Tenenbaum discovered ADAM, and because there was no oversight—no "God" or government to say "hey, maybe don't use little girls as slugs"—the city turned into a freak show.
Splicing became a requirement. If you weren't faster, smarter, or able to shoot bees out of your hands, you were obsolete. This is what happens when you take no gods and kings only man to its logical extreme. You end up with a society that views the human body as just another piece of hardware to be overclocked until it breaks.
Misinterpretations and Modern Politics
You’ll often see this quote used by people who think it’s a pro-libertarian anthem. They see the banner and think, "Yeah! I'm the master of my own fate!"
They're missing the ending of the story.
📖 Related: Dandys World Ship Chart: What Most People Get Wrong
The game is a tragedy. It’s a critique of the idea that humans can exist entirely outside of social responsibility. When Frank Fontaine (under the guise of Atlas) started his revolution, he used the language of the "people" to overthrow the "king," but he was just another power-hungry man.
The cycle is vicious.
- Reject the old masters.
- Proclaim a world of total individual freedom.
- Realize that power vacuums always get filled.
- Watch as the new master is worse than the old one.
It’s a pattern we see in history constantly, from the French Revolution to the digital gold rushes of today.
The Role of the Player
As Jack, you are the ultimate "man" in this scenario. But even you aren't free. The "Would you kindly" reveal is the ultimate middle finger to the idea of no gods and kings only man. You think you're making choices. You think you're the hero of your own story. In reality, you're a programmed tool.
You aren't a god. You aren't a king. You're barely even a man; you're a weapon.
This realization shatters the player's agency. It makes us realize that even in a world that claims to be about individual power, we are often just pawns in someone else's ego trip.
Applying the Lesson to the Real World
So, what do we actually do with this? Is the lesson just that everything sucks and we're all doomed? Not necessarily.
The real insight is that "Only Man" requires more responsibility, not less. If we don't have "Gods" or "Kings" to blame, then the weight of every ethical decision sits squarely on our shoulders. We can't point to a divine script or a royal decree.
👉 See also: Amy Rose Sex Doll: What Most People Get Wrong
If we choose to build a world based on no gods and kings only man, we have to be better than Andrew Ryan was. We have to realize that "The Great Chain" is only as strong as its weakest link. If we ignore the "small" people, the whole thing eventually snaps and sinks to the bottom of the ocean.
Moving Beyond the Banner
To really understand the weight of this philosophy, you should look at how it's portrayed in the sequels, particularly BioShock Infinite. While Rapture was about the failure of the individual, Columbia was about the failure of the collective (religious nationalism).
They are two sides of the same coin.
One side says "Only Man," and the other says "Only God (as interpreted by a King)." Both end in fire.
The middle ground—which is much harder to write a catchy banner for—is a world where we acknowledge our human limitations while still trying to build something that protects the vulnerable.
Actionable Insights for the Modern Human
If you're inspired (or terrified) by the concept of no gods and kings only man, here is how to apply the cautionary tale of Rapture to your own life and perspective:
- Question Radical Autonomy: Whenever someone tells you they "built it all themselves" without help from society, remember Andrew Ryan. No one exists in a vacuum. Acknowledging your support systems doesn't make you weak; it makes you realistic.
- Audit Your Own "Kings": We might not have monarchs, but we have influencers, CEOs, and political figures who we follow blindly. Don't trade one king for a guy with a blue checkmark or a massive stock portfolio.
- Ethics Over Efficiency: Rapture fell because it prioritized "can we" over "should we." In your career or personal projects, keep a moral compass that isn't tied to profit or raw output.
- Support Regulation with Purpose: The collapse of Rapture was accelerated by a lack of basic safety nets and oversight. In the real world, "rules" are often the only thing keeping the oxygen flowing for everyone, not just the elites.
- Read the Source Material: If you want to understand the "Man" part of the equation better, read The Sea-Wolf by Jack London or The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand. Don't just take the game's word for it. See the arguments that inspired the critique.
Rapture was a beautiful dream that turned into a nightmare because it forgot that "Man" is social. We aren't meant to live as isolated islands, even if those islands are under the sea. The banner was wrong. We need each other. And maybe, just maybe, we need a few rules to keep us from tearing each other apart for a bottle of ADAM.