You probably think you’re more "liberated" than your great-grandparents. We talk about sex constantly. It’s on every billboard, in every streaming queue, and discussed with clinical precision in therapy sessions. We assume the Victorians were prudes who locked their bedroom doors and blushed at the sight of a piano leg, while we—modern, enlightened, and free—finally spoke the truth about our desires.
Michel Foucault thought that was mostly nonsense.
In his 1976 landmark work, History of Sexuality Volume 1 (originally La Volonté de savoir), Foucault basically dropped a grenade into the middle of Western sociology. He looked at our obsession with "sexual liberation" and saw something much more sinister. Instead of a society finally breaking free from silence, he saw a society that had become obsessed with policing itself through talk. He called this the "Repressive Hypothesis," and his goal was to dismantle it entirely.
If you've ever felt like your identity is inextricably tied to who you're attracted to, or if you’ve wondered why the government seems so interested in your private life, you’re already living inside Foucault’s head.
The Myth of the Great Silence
Most of us grow up with a specific narrative about history. It goes like this: once upon a time, during the Renaissance, people were relatively open about bodies. Then came the 17th century and the rise of the bourgeoisie. Suddenly, everyone got quiet. Sex was confined to the "parental bedroom" for the sole purpose of procreation. Anything else was a sin, a crime, or a madness.
Foucault argues the exact opposite happened.
He notes that since the end of the 16th century, there has been a literal "discursive explosion" regarding sex. We didn't stop talking about it. We started categorizing it. We turned it into a science. Look at the Catholic Church and the evolution of the confession. It wasn't enough to say "I sinned." You had to describe the "how," the "when," the "thoughts" involved. You had to turn your inner desires into language.
This wasn't about being free. It was about being known.
✨ Don't miss: 100 Biggest Cities in the US: Why the Map You Know is Wrong
When you name something, you can track it. When you track it, you can control it. History of Sexuality Volume 1 argues that by creating a massive vocabulary for sex—terms like "invert," "fetishist," and "nymphomaniac"—power structures were actually tightening their grip, not loosening it.
Power Isn't Just a King Saying "No"
Usually, when we think of power, we think of a "top-down" model. A law is passed. A police officer arrests someone. A judge sends them to jail. This is what Foucault calls "juridical power." It’s negative. It says "Thou shalt not."
But in History of Sexuality Volume 1, power is portrayed as something productive. It doesn't just block things; it creates things. It creates "truths." It creates "identities."
Think about the "homosexual" as a category. Before the late 19th century, there were certainly sodomitical acts, but there wasn't really a "homosexual person" as a distinct psychological species. You did things; you weren't necessarily defined by them in a medical sense. Doctors and psychiatrists changed that. They took a behavior and turned it into a "pathology."
By defining these identities, the state and the medical establishment could now manage them. They weren't just banning an act; they were managing a population. This leads into one of Foucault’s most famous concepts: Biopower.
What the Heck is Biopower?
Historically, the sovereign (the King) had the "right to take life or let live." If you broke the law, he could kill you. Simple. Brutal.
Modern power is the inverse. It is the "power to foster life or disallow it to the point of death." Foucault explains in the final chapters of History of Sexuality Volume 1 that the state became obsessed with the body as a machine and the population as a biological entity.
🔗 Read more: Cooper City FL Zip Codes: What Moving Here Is Actually Like
How many people are being born? What is the mortality rate? How do we keep the workers healthy enough to work but docile enough to not revolt? Sex is the bridge between the individual body and the population at large. That’s why the government cares about birth control, marriage licenses, and sex ed. It’s not about morality. It’s about management.
It’s about making sure the "human stock" is efficient.
Why We Love Our Own Oppression
This is the part that usually makes people uncomfortable. Foucault suggests that our modern quest to "discover the truth" about our sexuality is actually a trap. We think that by "coming out" or being "sex-positive," we are resisting power.
Foucault disagrees.
He argues that the "obligation to confess" is so deeply ingrained in us that we feel a need to tell everyone who we are. We think we are being subversive. In reality, we are just handing the "authorities" (doctors, algorithms, therapists, the state) a more detailed map of our psyche.
The "Scientia Sexualis" (the science of sexuality) replaced the "Ars Erotica" (the art of pleasure). In the West, we don't care about pleasure as much as we care about meaning. We want to know what our sex life says about us. We want a diagnosis. We want a label.
Real-World Impact and Criticisms
Foucault wasn't writing in a vacuum. His work was a reaction to the psychoanalysis of Freud and the Marxism of the 1960s. He felt both were missing the point.
💡 You might also like: Why People That Died on Their Birthday Are More Common Than You Think
However, it’s worth noting that Foucault isn't a "fact" machine in the traditional sense. Historians like George Chauncey, author of Gay New York, have pointed out that Foucault’s timeline is a bit messy. The "medicalization" of sex didn't happen overnight, and in many places, the old "juridical" power stayed very much in play.
Also, Foucault is notoriously dense. He uses words like "episteme" and "discourse" in ways that can make your head spin. But the core insight remains: power is everywhere. It’s in the doctor’s office, the bedroom, and the classroom. It doesn't just hide sex; it forces sex into the light so it can be monitored.
Actionable Insights: How to Read the World Post-Foucault
If you want to apply the lessons of History of Sexuality Volume 1 to your own life, start looking at how you categorize yourself and others.
- Question the "Truth" of Labels. Next time you feel the need to find a hyper-specific label for your identity, ask yourself: Does this label make me more free, or does it just make me more "legible" to a system that wants to track me?
- Watch the "Experts." Notice how often "health" is used as a justification for controlling behavior. When a politician or a "wellness guru" talks about what is "natural" or "healthy" regarding sex, they are often exercising Biopower.
- Analyze the Confession. Look at social media. We are in a constant state of confession. We share our traumas, our preferences, and our private lives. Is this liberation, or are we just doing the work of the "police" for them?
- Separate Pleasure from Identity. Try to experience pleasure without needing it to "mean" something about your soul. Foucault was interested in "bodies and pleasures" rather than "sex and desire." The former is about the physical experience; the latter is a psychological construct that can be managed.
History of Sexuality Volume 1 isn't a history book in the way you’d expect. It’s a map of the invisible wires that move our arms and legs. It suggests that the "sexual revolution" wasn't a victory—it was a pivot. Power changed its tactics. It stopped using the whip and started using the checklist.
If you want to be truly radical, maybe stop trying to "find" yourself. Maybe the "self" you're looking for is just a category someone else built for you.
To dive deeper, skip the secondary summaries. Pick up the actual text and focus on the last chapter, "Right of Death and Power over Life." It's the most chilling and relevant part of the entire book for the 21st century. Observe how modern data tracking and "bio-hacking" trends mirror Foucault's warnings about the state's obsession with the biological optimization of the human race.