It’s a lithograph. It’s a trick. Honestly, it’s a headache waiting to happen if you stare at it too long. M.C. Escher finished House of Stairs in 1951, and since then, it’s basically become the gold standard for making people feel like they’ve forgotten how gravity works. You’ve probably seen it on a dorm room poster or in a math textbook. It features these weird, eyeless, armored creatures—they’re called "Wentelteefje" or "pedalternorotandomovens"—crawling up and down a series of stairs that shouldn't exist in a three-dimensional world.
The thing about House of Stairs is that it isn't just a drawing of a building. It's a mathematical manifesto. Escher wasn't a mathematician by trade, but he had this weird, intuitive grasp of geometry that left actual professors scratching their heads. He was obsessed with the idea of infinity. He wanted to capture it on a flat piece of paper. In this specific piece, he uses two vanishing points instead of the usual one or two used in traditional perspective, creating a loop that feels like it goes on forever.
💡 You might also like: How Is He Pulling That Off? The Physics and Psychology Behind Elite Performance
The Weird Geometry Inside House of Stairs
Most people look at this print and see a mess of steps. But if you really look—like, squint-your-eyes-and-trace-the-lines look—you’ll see it’s actually a cylinder. Escher took a rectangular room and wrapped it. If you were to stand inside the "real" version of this house, you’d be walking on the walls and the ceiling would be the floor. It’s a classic example of his fascination with relativity.
The stairs aren't just stairs. They are the framework for a world where "up" is a suggestion, not a law. Escher used a specific type of perspective here that forces the viewer's eye to travel in a circle. You start at the top, follow a creature down, and suddenly you're back at the top again. It’s a visual Mobius strip.
Why does this matter? Because in 1951, nobody was doing this. Art was either abstract or it was realistic. Escher carved out this strange middle ground where the drawing looks realistic—the textures of the stone, the shadows of the creatures—but the logic is pure fantasy. He was playing with the way our brains process depth. Our eyes want to find a horizon line. In House of Stairs, the horizon line is everywhere and nowhere at the same time.
Meet the Wentelteefje: Escher’s Favorite Pets
You can’t talk about this piece without talking about the "curl-ups." That’s the English translation for Wentelteefje. Escher actually invented these things. He wrote about them in detail, describing them as creatures that live in a world of steps. They have lizard-like bodies, human-ish feet, and parrot-like beaks.
They’re kind of creepy.
But they serve a purpose. In House of Stairs, these creatures demonstrate the "usability" of the impossible space. By having them crawl on every surface, Escher proves that in this world, every surface is a floor. One creature is walking "up" while another on the same set of stairs is walking "down" relative to our perspective, but for them, they’re just walking straight.
It’s worth noting that Escher was a bit of a perfectionist. He didn't just doodle these. He did dozens of anatomical sketches of the Wentelteefje to make sure their joints looked like they could actually function when they rolled into a ball. He wanted the impossible to look plausible. That’s the secret sauce of his popularity. If the creatures looked like cartoons, the illusion wouldn't work. Because they look like biological specimens, your brain tries to accept the stairs as a real place.
Why We Are Still Obsessed With This Print
Modern architecture and even filmmaking owe a huge debt to this specific lithograph. Think about the "folding Paris" scene in Inception or the shifting labyrinth in Jim Henson's Labyrinth. All of that DNA comes from Escher.
But there’s a deeper psychological layer here. House of Stairs represents the feeling of being stuck. It’s the ultimate "treadmill" image. No matter how hard these creatures climb, they never leave the room. They are trapped in a cycle of their own architecture. Some art critics argue this was Escher’s commentary on the repetitive nature of human life, though Escher himself usually claimed he was just interested in the math. He was notoriously modest. He often told people he wasn't an artist at all, but a "graphicist."
The math community, however, disagreed. Figures like Roger Penrose (who later won a Nobel Prize) and Bruno Ernst spent years analyzing how Escher manipulated Euclidean geometry. They found that Escher was essentially "breaking" 3D space by using 2D tricks that shouldn't work. He was playing with the "Penrose stairs" concept before it was even a fully formed mathematical theory.
Identifying a Real Escher Print
If you’re looking to buy a version of House of Stairs, you need to know what you’re looking at. Most what you see online are cheap offset lithos. They’re fine for decoration. But a real, original M.C. Escher print—one he actually pulled from the stone himself—is a different beast entirely.
- The Signature: Escher usually signed his original prints in pencil. If the signature is part of the ink of the drawing, it’s a reproduction.
- The Paper: He loved thin, Japanese paper (like washi). It has a specific texture that you can’t replicate with modern cardstock.
- The Edition Number: Look for markings like "M.C.E." or specific numbering. He didn't always number them in the way modern artists do, which makes authentication a nightmare for amateurs.
- The Crayon Texture: Because this is a lithograph, the original should have a slightly "grainy" or waxy look in the darker areas.
Most originals are locked away in places like the National Gallery of Art in Washington or the Escher in Het Paleis museum in The Hague. If you find one at a garage sale for $20, it’s a fake. Sorry.
The Practical Legacy of Impossible Spaces
So, how do you actually apply the logic of House of Stairs to your own life? It sounds weird, but Escher’s work is a lesson in perspective shifting.
💡 You might also like: Why Your Black Dress Needs Colored Shoes (And How To Not Mess It Up)
When you’re stuck on a problem, you’re usually looking at it from one "vanishing point." You see one floor and one ceiling. Escher suggests that if you just tilt the world 90 degrees, the wall becomes a path. It’s about lateral thinking. In design, Escher-style layouts are used to maximize small spaces or create visual interest in UI/UX design to keep users engaged.
It’s also a reminder that our perception is flawed. What we see isn't always what is actually there. We see a staircase; Escher sees a set of interlocking planes. We see a creature; Escher sees a geometric volume moving through a manifold.
Moving Beyond the Poster
If you want to dive deeper into the world of House of Stairs, don't just look at the pictures. Read Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid by Douglas Hofstadter. It’s a massive book, but it explains how Escher’s visual loops are the same thing as "strange loops" in computer programming and music (like Bach’s fugues).
It’s all connected. The stairs, the code, the music.
To truly appreciate the work, you have to stop trying to "solve" it. There is no exit to the house. There is no top floor. Once you accept that the loop is the point, the art starts to make sense. It’s not a puzzle to be solved; it’s a space to be inhabited.
Next Steps for the Escher Enthusiast:
- Visit a Permanent Collection: If you're in Europe, go to The Hague. Seeing the scale of the original stones Escher used changes how you view the "flatness" of the work.
- Analyze the Vanishing Points: Take a ruler to a high-res digital copy of the print. Try to find where the lines converge. You'll find they don't meet where they should, which is the key to the whole illusion.
- Explore Parallel Works: Look at Relativity (1953) and Convex and Concave (1955). These are the "siblings" to House of Stairs and show how Escher evolved the concept of the impossible room over a five-year period.
- Study the Lithography Process: Understanding how a stone is etched helps you appreciate the sheer labor involved. Every gray tone in those stairs was painstakingly created by hand, backwards, on a heavy slab of limestone.
Don't let the complexity intimidate you. At the end of the day, it's just a guy who liked to draw stairs. He just happened to be better at it than anyone else in history.