Why Life in Hell Comics Still Feel So Relatable (and Bleak) Today

Why Life in Hell Comics Still Feel So Relatable (and Bleak) Today

Matt Groening wasn't always the guy behind a billion-dollar yellow empire. Before Homer Simpson ever uttered a "D'oh," there was a floppy-eared, buck-toothed rabbit named Binky who was just trying to survive the crushing weight of existence. If you look at life in hell comics today, they don't feel like a relic of the late 70s or 80s. They feel like a mirror. A jagged, slightly uncomfortable mirror held up to the face of anyone who has ever hated their boss, feared their parents, or felt like a total failure in the dating world.

It started in 1977. Groening was basically a struggling transplant in Los Angeles, working crappy jobs—including a stint at the Los Angeles Reader—and venting his frustrations through a self-published zine. He’d photocopy the strips and sell them in the corner of a record store. It was raw. It was ugly. It was perfect.

Most people forget that the Simpsons wouldn't exist without Binky. When James L. Brooks approached Groening to create animated shorts for The Tracey Ullman Show, he originally wanted to adapt the life in hell comics. Groening, fearing he’d lose the rights to his characters or that the strip’s cynical edge would be blunted by TV executives, pivoted. He sketched out a dysfunctional family on the spot. He saved his rabbits by creating the Simpsons.

💡 You might also like: Glenn Close and The Wife 2017: Why This Performance Still Stings

The Uncomfortable Truths of Binky and Sheba

The strip wasn't about "jokes" in the traditional sense. Not always. It was more about the persistent, low-grade dread of being alive. You have Binky, the protagonist, who is essentially a stand-in for every anxious person ever. Then there’s Sheba, his estranged girlfriend, and Bongo, Binky’s illegitimate one-eared son. And let's not forget Akbar and Jeff.

Are Akbar and Jeff brothers? Lovers? Both? Groening famously kept that vague, once describing them as "whatever is most inappropriate for the situation." They wore fezzes and T-shirts and looked identical. They embodied the weird, codependent, and often toxic cycles people get into. Their "Love is Hell" chapters are arguably the most famous part of the series. They broke down the stages of a relationship with a brutal, clinical honesty that you just didn't see in the funny pages of a 1980s newspaper.

One strip might just be a list of "The 9 Types of Relationships," ranging from "The Total Disaster" to "The Mutual Boredom Society." It wasn't cynical just to be edgy. It was cynical because it was observant. Groening was looking at the world around him and seeing people who were trapped. Trapped by work. Trapped by school. Trapped by the weird social scripts we all follow without knowing why.

📖 Related: The Pariah Anthony Ryan Explained: Why This Gritty Epic Is Still A Must-Read

Why the Art Style Actually Matters

The drawing style in life in hell comics is deceptively simple. It’s scratchy. The lines are thick and sometimes a bit shaky. This wasn't because Groening couldn't draw; it was a choice that prioritized the rhythm of the dialogue and the timing of the misery. The characters rarely change expression. Binky’s wide, staring eyes convey a permanent state of "fight or flight" that resonates with anyone dealing with burnout.

There’s a specific kind of pacing in these strips. Groening would often use a "grid" of identical panels where the characters barely moved. The only thing that changed was the dialogue. This created a sense of claustrophobia. It made the reader feel the stagnation of the characters' lives. If you’ve ever sat in a cubicle for eight hours watching the clock not move, you understand the visual language of these comics.

The "Hell" Series: Work, School, and Childhood

Groening eventually branched out into themed collections. Work is Hell. School is Hell. Childhood is Hell. Each one tackled a different pillar of societal suffering.

In Work is Hell, he didn't just mock the boss. He mocked the entire concept of the 40-hour work week. He captured that specific 3:00 PM slump where your brain turns to mush. He wrote about "The 81 Types of Employees," identifying the "Quiet Overachiever Who Will Eventually Snap" and the "Incompetent Relative of the Owner." It’s funny because it’s a documentary.

Childhood is Hell was perhaps the darkest. Groening didn't go for the "nostalgic, golden-hued" look at youth. He remembered childhood as a time of being small, powerless, and constantly lied to by adults. He listed the "Lessons We Learned Too Late," like the fact that your parents aren't actually experts on anything.

The strip ran for over 30 years, finally ending in 2012. Think about that longevity. It survived the rise and fall of the underground press, the birth of the internet, and the total domination of its "younger sibling," The Simpsons. It stayed relevant because the core themes—alienation and the search for meaning in a beige world—don't have an expiration date.

The Legacy Beyond the Fez

It is almost impossible to overstate how much life in hell comics influenced the "alternative" comic scene. Without Groening’s success, would we have Dilbert? Maybe, but it would have been a lot softer. Would we have the nihilistic humor of modern webcomics? Probably not in the same way.

Groening proved that you could be successful by being "unpleasant." He showed that there was a massive audience of people who didn't want to be told that everything was going to be okay. They wanted someone to admit that, yeah, things are kind of a mess.

Even today, fans track down the original collections like The Big Book of Hell. They look for the old calendars and posters. There’s a cult-like devotion to Akbar and Jeff because they represent a specific kind of "urban survivalist" mindset. They are the weirdos who make it through the day by leaning into the absurdity of it all.

📖 Related: Wentworth Miller Law and Order SVU: The Role Everyone Forgets But Can't Stop Rewatching

How to Revisit the Series Today

If you're looking to dive back into this world, don't just look at the memes. You have to read them in sequence to get the "vibe."

  • Start with "Love is Hell." It’s the most accessible entry point and contains the most iconic observations about human connection (or the lack thereof).
  • Look for the "16-panel" strips. These are the ones where Groening really lets his observations breathe. They aren't quick gags; they are essays disguised as cartoons.
  • Compare it to early Simpsons. If you watch the first season of The Simpsons, you can see the DNA of life in hell comics everywhere. The cynicism is much higher, and the world feels a bit more dangerous and grimy.

There's something oddly comforting about Binky’s constant failure. In a world of curated Instagram lives and "hustle culture," reading about a rabbit who can't catch a break is a relief. It’s a reminder that it’s okay to struggle. It’s okay to be frustrated. And it’s definitely okay to wear a fez and complain about your relationship once in a while.

The comic didn't end because it became irrelevant. It ended because Groening had said everything that needed to be said about the particular "hell" of modern life. But as long as there are bosses to loathe and awkward first dates to endure, people will keep coming back to these scratchy, cynical, wonderful drawings.

To truly appreciate the evolution of modern satire, you should track down a physical copy of The Huge Book of Hell. Digital scans often miss the grit of the original newsprint texture, which was part of the experience. Once you’ve read through the "Work" and "School" sections, pay attention to the way Groening uses silence in his panels. It’s a masterclass in comic timing that most modern creators still haven't quite mastered. For a final step, compare the early 1980s strips to the final ones in 2012; you'll notice that while the world changed, Binky’s existential dread remained perfectly, hauntingly consistent.