He wasn't a robot. He wasn't a walking suit of life-support armor with a heavy breathing habit. Kylo Ren was something much more uncomfortable for audiences to digest when The Force Awakens dropped in 2015. He was a temperamental, entitled, and deeply wounded human being. If you’ve been following the discourse around the Ren villain in the Star Wars universe NYT pieces and critical essays over the last decade, you know the conversation hasn't really slowed down.
Ben Solo represents a shift in how we view "evil" in space opera. He isn't the cold, calculating strategist like Grand Admiral Thrawn. He's a mess. Honestly, that’s exactly why he works.
The Fragmented Legacy of Ben Solo
When the New York Times first started dissecting Adam Driver’s performance, they hit on a nerve: the idea of the "school shooter" archetype in a galaxy far, far away. It’s a dark comparison. But it fits the profile of a young man who felt abandoned by legendary parents and groomed by a literal monster in the shadows.
Adam Driver didn't play him like a caricature. He played him with a vibrating, high-strung energy that made you think he might burst into tears or murder everyone in the room. Or both. At the same time. This volatility is the engine of the sequel trilogy.
Think about the mask. Darth Vader needed his mask to breathe; it was his skin. Kylo Ren wore his mask because he was cosplaying. He was a fanboy of his own grandfather’s atrocities. This meta-layer—a character trying to live up to the "villain" brand—was a stroke of genius that reflected our own obsession with legacy.
The Problem With Perfection
Most villains in the franchise are static. Palpatine is just pure, unadulterated evil from the jump. He doesn't have an arc; he has a scheme. Kylo Ren, or the Ren villain in the Star Wars universe NYT readers debated during the Last Jedi era, is a constant pendulum.
One minute he’s killing Han Solo to "kill the past," and the next he’s looking at Rey with the puppy-dog eyes of a man who just wants to be understood. It's confusing. It’s supposed to be. Real people are inconsistent. We like to think villains are these monolithic pillars of bad intentions, but Ben Solo shows us that evil is often just a series of really terrible, ego-driven choices made by a person who feels small.
✨ Don't miss: Cómo salvar a tu favorito: La verdad sobre la votación de La Casa de los Famosos Colombia
Adam Driver and the Physicality of the Dark Side
You can’t talk about this character without talking about the acting. Driver brought a physical presence that felt heavy. When he swings that crossguard lightsaber, it doesn't look like a refined martial art. It looks like a guy trying to chop wood with a chainsaw. It’s ragged. The hum of the blade itself is cracked and unstable, a perfect auditory metaphor for his psyche.
The New York Times often pointed out how Driver’s background as a Marine might have influenced that rigid yet explosive posture. There is a specific kind of trauma written into the way he stands. He’s always uncomfortable in his own frame.
Comparing the Knights of Ren
We should probably mention his backup band. The Knights of Ren were hyped up to be the next big thing. In reality? They were mostly set dressing. While they looked cool on a poster, they didn't offer much to the narrative other than proving Kylo had "followers."
- They represented the vacuum left by the Sith.
- They showed that the "Ren" title was a philosophy, not just a name.
- Their eventual demise at Ben Solo's hands in The Rise of Skywalker signaled his complete break from that false identity.
It’s a bit of a letdown, honestly. We wanted more from them. But in a way, their insignificance highlights just how much Kylo Ren towered over his peers. He was the only one with a soul worth fighting for—or mourning.
What the NYT Got Right About the Kylo/Rey Connection
The "Force Bond" wasn't just a plot device to save on travel costs between planets. It was an intimate, almost intrusive look at two lonely people on opposite sides of a war. The Ren villain in the Star Wars universe NYT coverage often touched on the "Dyad" concept as a modern retelling of classic mythological tropes.
Is it a romance? Is it a tragedy? It’s probably a bit of both.
🔗 Read more: Cliff Richard and The Young Ones: The Weirdest Bromance in TV History Explained
People get really heated about the "Reylo" phenomenon. Some see it as a toxic dynamic, while others see it as a story of radical redemption. Regardless of where you land, you can't deny the chemistry. It made the stakes personal. When they fight, it isn't just about the fate of the Republic; it's about two people who finally felt "seen" by someone else, even if that person was their sworn enemy.
The Shadow of Han and Leia
You have to feel for Han and Leia. They were war heroes who couldn't figure out how to be parents to a sensitive, Force-sensitive kid. That's a very human failure.
The scene on the bridge in The Force Awakens remains one of the most gut-wrenching moments in cinematic history. "I know what I have to do, but I don't know if I have the strength to do it." He’s asking his father to help him become a monster. And Han, being Han, tries to help his son one last time, even if it costs him his life.
The Philosophy of "Kill the Past"
"Let the past die. Kill it, if you have to. That’s the only way to become who you’re meant to be."
This line from The Last Jedi became the manifesto for a whole generation of fans. It wasn't just about Star Wars; it was about the burden of expectations. Kylo Ren wanted to burn the Jedi, the Sith, and the Skywalkers to the ground. He wanted a blank slate.
But the irony is that he was obsessed with the past. He spent his whole life trying to recreate the Empire. He was a hypocrite. Just like most of us. We rail against our upbringing while wearing the clothes our parents bought us.
💡 You might also like: Christopher McDonald in Lemonade Mouth: Why This Villain Still Works
The Evolution of the Red Lightsaber
- Vader’s Saber: A tool of precision and fear.
- Maul’s Saber: A weapon of flashy intimidation.
- Kylo’s Saber: A broken, sparking hazard that looks like it might explode in his hand.
That design choice was intentional. It tells you everything you need to know about the Ren villain in the Star Wars universe NYT critics were fascinated by. He wasn't a finished product. He was a work in progress, and the progress was going poorly.
Why the Redemption Worked (and Why It Didn't)
By the time we get to the end of the trilogy, the pivot back to "Ben" feels inevitable but rushed. The shrug he gives after pulling the saber from the Force to fight the Knights of Ren? Pure Han Solo. In that one gesture, Driver reclaimed the character's lineage.
Some people hate that he died. They feel it’s a "easy way out" for a character who committed mass murder. Others feel it’s the only way a Skywalker story could end—with a sacrifice.
The New York Times critics often debated if Star Wars is too obsessed with redemption. Can someone who helped blow up a star system really be "good" because they saved one person at the end? It’s a valid question. Star Wars doesn't deal in judicial justice; it deals in spiritual grace. Whether you buy it or not depends on your own views on forgiveness.
Moving Beyond the Sequel Trilogy
Even though the Skywalker Saga is "over," the shadow of the Ren villain remains. We see his influence in the way new villains are written. They are more complex. They have more doubt.
If you're looking to understand the character deeper, start with the comic series The Rise of Kylo Ren by Charles Soule. It fills in the gaps that the movies left wide open. It shows the actual fall of the temple and how Snoke (or Palpatine, let's be real) manipulated Ben’s feelings of isolation.
Actionable Steps for Star Wars Enthusiasts:
- Watch the "Sacrifice" Parallels: Re-watch the end of Return of the Jedi and The Rise of Skywalker back-to-back. Notice how Vader’s redemption is about a father saving a son, while Ben’s is about a man finally choosing his own path over the voices in his head.
- Read the Source Material: Pick up The Rise of Kylo Ren comics. They clarify that Ben didn't actually want to kill the other students at Luke's academy; it was a series of tragic accidents and misunderstandings fueled by the Dark Side.
- Analyze the Sound Design: Listen to Kylo Ren’s theme by John Williams. It’s a five-note motif that feels unfinished. It never quite resolves, much like the character himself.
- Explore the NYT Archives: Search for the specific 2017-2019 cultural critiques of Adam Driver's performance to see how mainstream media's perception of "fandom" shifted because of this character.
The legacy of Kylo Ren isn't about the mask or the First Order. It’s about the terrifying reality that even someone from the best family, with the most potential, can lose their way. And the equally powerful idea that it’s never quite too late to turn back, even if you’re standing in the middle of the wreckage you caused.