It was a random Sunday in January. Most people were probably thinking about the NFL playoffs or what they had to do for work the next morning. If you were a Lakers fan in 2006, you were mostly just frustrated. The team was… okay. Not great. Just okay. They were playing the Toronto Raptors, a team that wasn’t exactly a powerhouse at the time. Honestly, the first half didn't look like history. It looked like a blowout, and not the good kind. The Lakers were down by 18 points. Then, Kobe Bryant decided that losing to the Raptors at home wasn't on his agenda for the evening.
What followed wasn't just a hot streak. It was a glitch in the simulation. By the time the final buzzer rang, Kobe had dropped 81 points.
Eighty-one.
To put that in perspective, there are entire NBA teams that sometimes struggle to hit 80 points in the modern era with all the three-point hunting and fast-pace play. Kobe did it by himself while being double and triple-teamed. People like to talk about Wilt Chamberlain’s 100-point game, and yeah, that’s the record. But Wilt was a giant playing against guys who literally couldn't reach his shoulders. Kobe was a 6'6" guard shooting over defenders who knew exactly what was coming and still couldn't do a damn thing about it.
The math behind the 81 point game that breaks your brain
Let’s look at the actual box score because the numbers are frankly stupid. Kobe played nearly 42 minutes. He took 46 shots. He made 28 of them. That’s over 60% shooting while taking some of the most difficult, contested "Kobe shots" you can imagine. He hit 7 of 13 from deep and 18 of 20 from the free-throw line.
But here is the part that actually kills me: he had 26 points at halftime.
💡 You might also like: Por qué los partidos de Primera B de Chile son más entretenidos que la división de honor
That means he scored 55 points in the second half alone. He outscored the entire Raptors team 55-41 in the final two quarters. Imagine being Sam Mitchell, the Raptors coach at the time. You’re trying everything. You’re throwing box-and-one defenses at him. You’re telling your players to foul him. It didn’t matter. Kobe was in that "white light" zone where the rim looks like the size of a hula hoop.
Phil Jackson, a man who coached Michael Jordan during the 63-point playoff game against the Celtics, sat there on the bench looking almost bored. Or maybe just stunned. Jackson later said it was "something to behold," which is high praise from a guy who usually hates individual scoring outbursts. The efficiency is what sticks out. Usually, when a guy shoots 46 times, it’s a "chuck-fest." But Kobe wasn't chucking. He was surgical.
Why nobody saw this coming (not even Kobe)
If you watch the pre-game interviews or look at the vibe in Staples Center that night, there was zero indication we were about to see the greatest individual scoring performance of the modern era. Kobe's knee was bothering him. He’d spent a good chunk of the pre-game time in the training room.
The Lakers were stagnant. Lamar Odom was struggling. Smush Parker and Chris Mihm were… well, they were Smush Parker and Chris Mihm. The burden on Kobe was immense during that 2005-2006 season. This was the peak of "Solo Kobe." Shaq was in Miami winning a title with D-Wade. Kobe was in LA trying to prove he could win as the man, but the roster around him was, frankly, a mess.
There’s a famous story about Kobe’s grandmother being at the game. It was the only NBA game she ever saw him play in person. She lived in Philadelphia and didn't like to fly, but she made the trip for his birthday (which was months prior, but she visited then). She was there to see her grandson, and he gave her the greatest show in basketball history. Kobe later mentioned that he didn't even realize how many points he had until the very end. He was just trying to win a game they were losing.
📖 Related: South Carolina women's basketball schedule: What Most People Get Wrong
The "What If" factor and the Raptors' defensive collapse
We have to talk about the defense. Or the lack thereof.
Jalen Rose has spent the last two decades being the "guy who got 81 dropped on him." He’s a good sport about it now, but at the time, it was an embarrassment. The Raptors refused to double-team Kobe early enough. They played him straight up for way too long. By the time they started trapping him, it was too late. He was already warm.
When a player like Kobe gets into a rhythm, the defense becomes irrelevant. You can have a hand in his face, you can trip him, you can pull his jersey—the ball is going in. He scored 27 points in the third quarter and 28 in the fourth. It was a rhythmic, relentless dismantling of a professional basketball team.
Some critics—mostly the ones who never liked Kobe’s style—will tell you he should have passed more. To who? Smush Parker? Kwame Brown? If Kobe passes the ball in the third quarter of that game, the Lakers lose. He had to score. It wasn't ego; it was physics. The Lakers needed points, and he was the only one capable of manufacturing them against a set defense.
The legacy of 81 in the era of high-scoring games
Recently, we’ve seen guys like Donovan Mitchell, Devin Booker, and Luka Doncic put up 70+ points. It’s becoming more common. The pace is faster. There are more threes. The "freedom of movement" rules make it way harder to guard elite scorers without picking up a foul.
👉 See also: Scores of the NBA games tonight: Why the London Game changed everything
This actually makes Kobe’s 81 point game look better over time.
In 2006, the league was slower. Defenses were allowed to be more physical. Hand-checking was technically out, but the "grit and grind" era was still very much alive. Kobe didn't have the spacing that modern players have. He didn't have four shooters standing on the perimeter to keep the lane open. He was operating in a crowded paint, mid-range heavy, and still touched the sky.
If you put 2006 Kobe in 2026's NBA environment? Honestly, he might actually hit 100.
The 81-point game essentially ended the debate about who the best scorer in the league was. T-Mac was great. Iverson was legendary. But Kobe was different. He had the footwork of a ballet dancer and the mentality of a shark. He didn't celebrate much after the game. He walked off the court, pointed a finger in the air, and that was basically it. Mission accomplished.
How to actually appreciate the 81 point game today
If you want to understand the "Mamba Mentality" without the marketing fluff, go watch the full fourth quarter of this game on YouTube. Don't just watch the highlights. Watch the way he breathes. Watch the way he ignores the fatigue. By the end, he was exhausted, but his mechanics never broke.
Most players, when they get tired, their jump shot starts to flat-line. Their legs give out. Kobe’s form at point 81 looked exactly the same as it did at point 2. That’s the result of thousands of hours of mindless, repetitive training.
Actionable steps for students of the game:
- Analyze the shot map: If you look at where Kobe scored, it wasn't just at the rim. He lived in the "dead zones" of the court—the areas modern analytics tell you to avoid. It proves that elite skill beats "efficient" math every time.
- Study the footwork: Pay attention to his triple-threat position. He didn't waste dribbles. He used his pivots to create inches of space, which was all he needed.
- Contextualize the comeback: Remember that this wasn't a "garbage time" stat-pad. The Lakers were losing. This was a high-pressure performance required to secure a win for a team fighting for a playoff spot.
- Watch the off-ball movement: Kobe scored a lot of these points by sprint-cutting to spots before the ball even reached him. He worked harder than anyone else on the floor just to get the ball.
There will never be another game quite like it. The 100-point game is a mythic relic of a different sport. The 81-point game is the gold standard for modern basketball. It’s the ceiling of what a human being can do on a basketball court when they decide they simply refuse to lose. It wasn't just about the points; it was about the absolute, terrifying will of a man who decided that for 48 minutes, the rules of reality didn't apply to him.