Don't read it. Honestly, that’s the advice most people give when someone mentions Donatien Alphonse François de Sade—the Marquis de Sade. But we’re talking about Justine or the Misfortunes of Virtue, a book that basically invented a specific brand of literary misery. It’s not just a "bad book" in the sense of quality. It’s a book that sets out to prove that being a good person will get you destroyed. Most stories follow a "virtue rewarded" arc. Sade looks at that and laughs. He flips the script entirely.
Justine is the sister of Juliette. While Juliette is out there being "bad" and getting rich, Justine tries to keep her morals intact. She’s pious. She’s kind. She’s honest. And for every single one of those virtues, she gets punished. Brutally. It’s a weird, repetitive, and deeply disturbing cycle that has kept scholars and bored undergrads debating for centuries. Is it philosophy? Is it just shock value? It's probably both.
The Philosophy of Systematic Suffering
The Marquis de Sade didn't write this just to be a jerk, though he definitely was one. He wrote the first version in 1787 while he was locked up in the Bastille. Think about that environment. He's sitting in a cell, the French Revolution is brewing, and he decides to write a story about a girl who does everything right and loses everything anyway. It’s a direct attack on the Enlightenment thinkers like Rousseau.
Rousseau thought people were naturally good. Sade thought that was total nonsense. He argues through his characters—mostly the villains who spend a lot of time lecturing Justine while they torture her—that Nature is actually cruel. To Sade, following "virtue" is going against the natural order of strength and desire. He’s basically the dark, edgy mirror of the 18th century.
You’ve got to understand the structure. It’s episodic. Justine meets a monk? He hurts her. She meets a wealthy man? He hurts her. She helps someone? They hurt her. It becomes almost a parody of the picaresque novel. Usually, in those books, the hero learns a lesson and grows. Justine doesn't grow. She just suffers. It’s bleak. Really bleak.
✨ Don't miss: Am I Gay Buzzfeed Quizzes and the Quest for Identity Online
Why We Still Talk About Sade's Most Infamous Character
Most people know the word "sadism." It comes from his name. That’s a heavy legacy. But Justine or the Misfortunes of Virtue is where the rubber meets the road for that philosophy. It’s not just about the physical acts; it’s about the mental breakdown of the idea that "good wins."
The book actually exists in three different versions.
- Les Infortunes de la vertu (1787): The shorter, slightly more "reserved" version.
- Justine ou les Malheurs de la vertu (1791): This is the one most people refer to.
- La Nouvelle Justine (1797): This one is way longer, way more explicit, and way more aggressive.
Napoleon Bonaparte supposedly called it "the most abominable book ever engendered by the most depraved imagination." High praise, if you’re a provocateur. But Napoleon wasn't just being a prude. He saw the book as a threat to social order. If people actually believed that being good was a waste of time, society would crumble. That’s why Sade spent most of his life in prisons or asylums. He wasn't just a writer; he was a walking breach of the peace.
The Problem with Reading Justine Today
If you pick up a copy today, you’ll notice something pretty quickly. It’s repetitive. Sade wasn't exactly a master of "show, don't tell." His characters will stop in the middle of a scene to give a ten-page lecture on why God doesn't exist or why the strong should eat the weak. It’s dense. It’s kinda like reading a philosophy textbook written by a madman who has a very specific, very dark hobby.
🔗 Read more: Easy recipes dinner for two: Why you are probably overcomplicating date night
Actually, many modern feminists and literary critics have tried to reclaim Justine, or at least analyze her through a new lens. Some see her as a symbol of the systematic oppression of women. Others see her as a blank slate that Sade uses to vent his frustrations with the world. Angela Carter wrote an entire book about this called The Sadeian Woman. She argued that Sade was "the first writer to see women as more than just reproductive machines," even if his way of showing that was through extreme violence. It’s a complicated, messy take.
The Ending Everyone Remembers
The ending of Justine or the Misfortunes of Virtue is iconic for how mean-spirited it is. After years of suffering, Justine finally reunites with her sister, Juliette. It looks like things might finally be okay. Maybe she’ll find peace? Nope. A bolt of lightning literally strikes her. It’s like Sade couldn't let the book end without Nature itself taking a shot at her.
Juliette, on the other hand, lives a long, prosperous life because she embraced her "vices." It’s a punch in the gut to the reader. It’s meant to be. Sade wanted you to feel frustrated. He wanted to strip away the "comfort" of a happy ending. He wanted to show that the universe is indifferent to your moral choices.
How to Approach the Text If You're Curious
If you're actually going to dive into this, don't go for the 1797 version first. It’s a slog. Start with the 1791 version. It has enough of the philosophical meat without being purely a catalog of horrors.
💡 You might also like: How is gum made? The sticky truth about what you are actually chewing
Also, look for editions with good footnotes. A lot of what Sade is talking about is a direct response to 18th-century French politics and religion. Without the context, some of the rants seem random. With the context, you realize he’s basically trolling the entire Catholic Church and the French judicial system of his time.
- Check out the Oxford World's Classics edition. It has a solid introduction that explains the historical context.
- Read it alongside his sister-novel, Juliette. Seeing the contrast between the two sisters makes the philosophy clearer.
- Don't take it at face value. Sade was a master of irony. Sometimes he’s being serious, and sometimes he’s pushing an idea to its most absurd conclusion just to see what happens.
Practical Steps for Understanding Sadeian Literature
If you want to understand the impact of Justine or the Misfortunes of Virtue without losing your mind, follow this path:
- Read the "Short" Version First: Start with The Misfortunes of Virtue (the 1787 draft). It's more focused and less repetitive.
- Research the Enlightenment Context: Look up the works of Baron d'Holbach or La Mettrie. Sade took their materialist ideas and pushed them into the "dark" side.
- Watch the 1969 film (with caution): Marquis de Sade: Justine, directed by Jess Franco, is a wild, stylized take. It's not a direct translation of the book’s depth, but it shows how the imagery has permeated pop culture.
- Analyze the "Philosophy in the Bedroom": This is another Sade work that’s more dialogue-heavy and explains his "system" in a more structured (though still graphic) way.
- Reflect on the "Just World Fallacy": Use the book as a jumping-off point to think about why we feel the need for stories where the good guy wins. Why does it bother us so much when they don't?
Sade’s work remains a lightning rod because it challenges the most basic assumption of human society: that being "good" matters. Whether you find him a genius or a monster, Justine remains the ultimate testament to his refusal to play by the rules of polite storytelling. It’s a rough read, but it’s a foundational piece of transgressive literature that isn't going away anytime soon.