Why J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Return of the King is Still the Blueprint for Every Fantasy Ending

Why J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Return of the King is Still the Blueprint for Every Fantasy Ending

It’s been decades since the third volume of the most famous trilogy in literature hit the shelves, yet we are still chasing the high of that final stand at the Black Gate. Most people think they know the story because they saw Peter Jackson’s movies. The movies were great. Honestly, they were masterpieces. But J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Return of the King is a different beast entirely when you sit down and actually inhabit the prose. It’s not just a war story. It isn't just about a guy getting a crown. It’s a dense, messy, beautiful meditation on what happens when the world breaks and you have to find a way to live in the wreckage.

Tolkien wasn’t just "writing fantasy." He was exorcising the ghosts of the Somme. He was mourning a vanishing England. When you read the final chapters, you aren’t just finishing a book; you’re witnessing the end of an Age.

The Myth of the Simple Hero in The Return of the King

Everyone remembers Aragorn. He’s the guy on the cover. He’s the "King" in the title, obviously. But if you look at the actual structure of the narrative, Aragorn is almost a background radiation of competence while the real heart of the book—the Hobbits—suffers through the actual grit.

Tolkien does something risky here. He splits the narrative. We spend half our time with the grand politics of Gondor and the other half in the literal hellscape of Mordor. People forget how bleak the Mordor chapters are. They are slow. They are agonizing. Frodo and Sam aren't "adventuring" anymore; they are dying. Tolkien describes the parched throats and the psychological weight of the Ring with a physical intensity that makes your own neck ache. It’s a study in exhaustion.

Why Frodo Failed (And Why That Matters)

Here is the thing that often gets lost in the pop-culture version of the story: Frodo Baggins failed.

He didn't throw the Ring into the fire. At the absolute climax of The Return of the King, at the Crack of Doom, he claimed it. He gave in. If it weren't for Gollum’s intervention—a "chance" occurrence that Tolkien implies was actually divine providence or the natural consequence of Gollum’s own treachery—Sauron would have won.

💡 You might also like: Why Love Island Season 7 Episode 23 Still Feels Like a Fever Dream

This is a massive point of contention for some readers. They want the hero to be heroic at the finish line. Tolkien, however, was a devout Catholic who understood that human will has its limits. He wrote in his letters (specifically Letter 246) that Frodo’s "failure" wasn't a moral one. It was simply that the power of the Ring had become physically and mentally impossible for any creature to resist at that proximity. By making Frodo fail, Tolkien makes the victory more about grace and less about muscle. It’s a profound shift from the standard "warrior saves the day" trope.

The Scouring of the Shire: The Ending You Probably Missed

If you’ve only seen the movies, you missed the most important part of the book. Period.

After the Ring is destroyed, after Aragorn is crowned, after the weddings and the songs—the Hobbits go home. And they find that the war followed them. Saruman has taken over the Shire. He’s turned it into a proto-industrial wasteland. There are guards, rules, and "Gatherers." The trees have been cut down.

Why did Tolkien include this? It feels like an anticlimax to some. But for Tolkien, this was the whole point. He wanted to show that you can’t just go back to being the person you were before the trauma. The Hobbits have to lead a revolution in their own backyard. Merry and Pippin, who started the series as comic relief, show up as battle-hardened commanders. They don't need a wizard or a king to save them anymore. They saved themselves.

This is the "Return" that actually matters. It’s the return of agency to the small people of the world.

📖 Related: When Was Kai Cenat Born? What You Didn't Know About His Early Life

The Bittersweet Reality of Grey Havens

Then there’s the departure. The "happily ever after" is a lie in Middle-earth. Frodo is wounded. Not just in his shoulder from the Morgul-blade, but in his soul. He has PTSD. He tells Sam, "It must often be so, Sam, when things are in danger: some one has to give them up, lose them, so that others may keep them."

That line hurts.

Tolkien’s The Return of the King ends with a departure because the magic is leaving the world. The Elves are gone. The Ents are fading. The Fourth Age is the Age of Men, and while that sounds triumphant, Tolkien frames it as a loss of wonder. It’s incredibly somber.

The Logistics of Gondor: What Most People Get Wrong

People treat the Siege of Gondor like a standard fantasy battle. It wasn't. Tolkien’s background in linguistics and history meant he cared deeply about the feeling of a real siege. Denethor is often portrayed as a raving lunatic (thanks, movies), but in the book, he’s a tragic figure of immense intellect who has been broken by looking into the Palantír. He saw the inevitable defeat of his people and chose despair because it was the only logical response to the data he had.

  1. The Pyre of Denethor: In the text, this isn't just a crazy man jumping off a cliff. It's a calculated, ritualistic suicide by a man who believes he is the last of a noble line.
  2. The Rohirrim: Their arrival isn't just a "cool cavalry charge." It's a moment of "eucatastrophe"—a term Tolkien coined for the sudden, joyous turn in a story that saves everyone from certain doom.
  3. The Army of the Dead: This is a big one. In the book, the dead don't actually fight at Minas Tirith. They don't show up and green-blob the orcs. They scare the pirates away from the ships, allowing Aragorn to man those ships with actual living soldiers from the southern fiefs of Gondor. It’s a much more grounded, human victory.

Why This Book Still Ranks as the Greatest

We live in an era of "grimdark" fantasy where everyone is a jerk and nothing matters. Tolkien is often accused of being too simplistic—good vs. evil. But The Return of the King is actually quite grey. It’s about the burden of duty. It’s about the fact that even if you win the war, you might not get to enjoy the peace.

👉 See also: Anjelica Huston in The Addams Family: What You Didn't Know About Morticia

Look at the character of Faramir. He’s arguably the most "civilized" person in the book. He doesn't want to use the Ring. He doesn't love the sword for its sharpness. He loves what he protects. Tolkien used Faramir as a mouthpiece for his own philosophy. In a world obsessed with power, Faramir is the man who chooses to put it down.

Real-World Impact and Legacy

The influence of this single volume is staggering. You don't get Game of Thrones without Tolkien. George R.R. Martin has famously obsessed over "Aragorn's tax policy," arguing that Tolkien didn't explain how the King actually ruled. But Tolkien wasn't writing a political treatise. He was writing a myth.

Myth doesn't care about tax policy. Myth cares about the fundamental truths of the human condition.

How to Actually Experience The Return of the King Today

If you want to truly understand this work, you have to move past the surface level. It’s easy to get bogged down in the names—there are a lot of them. But here is how you should actually approach it if you want the full experience.

Don't skip the Appendices.
Seriously. The meat of the lore is in the back. Appendix A contains "The Tale of Aragorn and Arwen," which is the actual emotional core of their relationship. Without it, their romance feels like a footnote. In the text, it’s a heartbreaking story about the choice between immortality and love.

Listen to the Phil Dragash Soundscape.
If you struggle with the density of the prose, there is an "unofficial" dramatic reading by Phil Dragash that uses the film’s score and sound effects. It’s transformative. It brings the pacing of the book into a modern context without losing a single word of Tolkien’s language.


Next Steps for the Tolkien Enthusiast

  • Read "The Tale of Aragorn and Arwen" in Appendix A before you re-watch the movies. It changes the way you view Aragorn’s reluctance to lead.
  • Compare the "Scouring of the Shire" chapter to Tolkien’s real-life letters about the industrialization of the English countryside. It adds a layer of social commentary you might have missed as a kid.
  • Track the dates in the book. Tolkien was meticulous about the lunar cycle and travel times. Notice how the events at the Black Gate and Mount Doom happen simultaneously. The tension is built into the calendar.