The sneaker world changed forever in 2017. Before that year, "collaboration" usually just meant a new colorway or a different material on a tongue. Then Virgil Abloh happened. When the "The Ten" collection dropped, the Jordan Off White shoes—specifically the Chicago 1s—didn't just sell out; they shattered the logic of how we design footwear. You’ve probably seen the red zip ties hanging off people's ankles in airports or on Instagram. It looks unfinished. It looks like a prototype. And that is exactly why people are still willing to drop five figures on a pair today.
Honestly, it’s about the "ghosting." Virgil’s whole philosophy was based on the idea of the "3 percent rule"—the belief that you only need to change a classic design by 3 percent to make it something entirely new. He took the Air Jordan 1, a shoe everyone already loved, and literally cut it open. He moved the Swoosh. He added text in Helvetica that told you exactly what you were looking at: "AIR," "SHOELACES," "85." It was meta. It was self-aware. It was genius.
The Architecture of the Jordan Off White Shoes
Most people think these sneakers are just about the hype. They aren't. If you actually hold a pair of the Off-White x Air Jordan 1 "Chicago" in your hands, the first thing you notice is how flimsy they feel compared to a standard retro. That’s intentional. Virgil used exposed foam, mesh, and clear plastics. He wanted you to see how the shoe was built. He called it "revealing the inner workings."
The design is inherently fragile. The foam yellows over time. The mesh frays. The "AIR" branding on the midsole can peel if you scuff it too hard. In a weird way, that fragility makes them more valuable. It’s a ticking clock. A "deadstock" (unworn) pair from 2017 is becoming a rare artifact because the materials are literally oxidizing while sitting in the box.
Why the Jordan 4 "Sail" Hit Differently
While the 1s get all the glory, the Off-White x Air Jordan 4 "Sail" might be the most wearable masterpiece in the lineup. Released in 2020 as a women’s exclusive (though men fought tooth and nail to find their size equivalents), it ditched the heavy deconstruction for a monochromatic, creamy aesthetic.
It feels more sophisticated.
✨ Don't miss: Why T. Pepin’s Hospitality Centre Still Dominates the Tampa Event Scene
The translucent wings and the "AIR" text on the heel aren't screaming for attention like the red and white contrast of the Chicago 1. It’s a subtle flex. It proved that the collaboration wasn't just a one-hit-wonder based on shock value. It showed that Virgil could do "luxury" just as well as he could do "industrial."
What Most People Get Wrong About the Zip Tie
Here is the thing: you aren't actually "supposed" to leave the zip tie on. Or maybe you are. Virgil himself once posted a video showing people how to cut it off, but then he also said the whole point was to challenge the "newness" of a product.
Leaving the plastic tag on is a polarizing move. In the sneaker community, it’s often a litmus test. Some see it as the ultimate sign of "I just bought this and it’s expensive," while others see it as an essential part of the silhouette’s geometry. If you take it off, the balance of the shoe changes. It becomes just another Jordan. With the tag, it’s a piece of contemporary art.
The Reality of the Resale Market in 2026
If you’re looking to buy Jordan Off White shoes right now, you need to be careful. The market is a minefield. Because these shoes are so "deconstructed," they are actually some of the easiest shoes for counterfeiters to mimic. High-tier "reps" have become so sophisticated that even some seasoned "legit checkers" struggle to spot the difference without a UV light or a microscopic look at the stitching on the Swoosh.
- The "Chicago" 1s: Expect to pay anywhere from $5,000 to $10,000 depending on the size and condition.
- The "UNC" 1s: A bit more "affordable" but still hovering in the $2,000+ range.
- The "Euro" White 1s: These were a regional exclusive and are incredibly hard to find in pristine condition.
The price isn't just about rarity. It's about legacy. Since Virgil Abloh’s passing in late 2021, these shoes have transitioned from "cool footwear" to "historical monuments." They represent a specific era of fashion where streetwear officially ate high fashion. When Louis Vuitton appointed Virgil as their Artistic Director, it validated every kid who was standing in line for these Jordans.
🔗 Read more: Human DNA Found in Hot Dogs: What Really Happened and Why You Shouldn’t Panic
How to Tell if They Are Real (The Nuances)
Don't rely on the box. Rely on the "ghost stitching." On the leather panels of the Jordan 1, there are tiny perforations where the stitching would normally be. On authentic pairs, these holes are crisp, deep, and evenly spaced. Most fakes have "lazy" ghost stitching that looks like it was poked with a dull needle.
Also, look at the font. The quotation marks on the midsole should be sharp. The "85" on the inside flap of the ankle should be slightly embossed, not just printed flat. If the text looks too bold or too blurry, walk away.
The Durability Problem
Let's be real: these are not everyday shoes. If you wear your Off-White 5s or 2s in the rain, you're going to regret it. The materials are porous. The yellowing is inevitable. Even if you keep them in a climate-controlled plastic box, the "Sail" colors will eventually darken. Some collectors actually prefer this. They call it "character." They think the shoe looks better when it looks like it’s been through something. I sort of agree, but it's a painful "look" to achieve when you've spent three months' rent on them.
The Cultural Weight of the Collaboration
Why does this matter more than a Travis Scott or a Dior Jordan?
Because Virgil was an architect by trade. He didn't just change the colors; he changed the language of the shoe. He was obsessed with the idea of "Work in Progress." By putting the words "SHOELACES" on the laces, he was mocking the very idea of branding while simultaneously creating the most recognizable branding of the decade. It was ironic. It was "Duchampian" for the Hypebeast generation.
💡 You might also like: The Gospel of Matthew: What Most People Get Wrong About the First Book of the New Testament
The Jordan 5 "Muslin" is a great example of this. He literally cut holes in the shoe. You can see your socks through the circular windows on the side panels. It’s weird. It’s impractical. And it’s exactly why it works. It forces you to interact with the object in a way you never would with a standard pair of sneakers.
Moving Forward With Your Collection
Buying Jordan Off White shoes isn't like buying a pair of Yeezys or standard Dunks. It’s an investment in a specific moment in design history. If you're going to jump in, you have to decide if you're a "rocker" or a "stocker."
If you're going to wear them, accept the yellowing. Accept that the foam will eventually crumble. That’s the "life" of the shoe Virgil designed. He wanted them to be used. He wanted them to be seen.
If you’re looking to pick up your first pair, skip the Chicago 1s unless you have a massive budget. Look at the Jordan 5 "Black" or the Jordan 4 "Sail." They offer the best balance of that iconic Off-White aesthetic without the astronomical "Grail" pricing of the original 2017 drop. Always use a reputable middleman service like GOAT or StockX that offers physical authentication, or better yet, find a local reputable consignment shop where you can see the ghost stitching and the foam density with your own eyes before the money leaves your account.
Verify the "Zip Tie" color for the specific model year, as they changed from red to light blue to orange depending on the release. Check the "Made in China" tag location and the font weight on the medial side text—these are the small details that distinguish a museum piece from a piece of junk.